I don’t understand why others investigating vaccine injury would discount this theory. It actually works hand-in-hand with their work. If a vaccine is believed by one to be toxic, wouldn’t injecting the toxin intravenously be a researchable aspect of their own work? Wouldn’t their own work benefit from investigating “The Bolus Theory” as a tangential avenue of research to explain the profound injuries, cancers, and neuro disorders they claim are the result of the toxins they espouse? It seems like this theory would actually compliment and support their own research. I’m confused about the dismissal of the theory by those claiming to desire the truth behind vaccine injury.
Thank you for your work, Mr. Girardot. Those of us profoundly affected by vaccine injury are grateful for anyone willing to dedicate time and energy to the cause. I am sharing your research and work with other moms of Autism, as well as any other people willing to listen. You have a sound and reasonable explanation, impressive and inarguable data, and the theory should be respected and discussed in research circles.
On a different note:- The other massive danger from the mass vaccination program. This is independent of the damage caused by the Bolus - and the flow on effects of that. This is the actual evolutionary pressures placed on the virus by the mass vaccination program, and the direction this is taking.
We have survived all the worst evolutionary pressures.
If people live like we've evolved from in the wild, ie with abundant food, and in a sane environment (ie nor living int he filth of contained animals)...we will be fine. nature threw all the curve balls at our immune system. The rest is BS.
Men think they are too important. Our bodies can withstand most BS...but up to a certain limit..
You could be right, but it is still a definite risk that under the evolutionary pressures exerted by the mass vaccination program the Virus will become much more dangerous to those who have been multi-vaccinated - who number in the billions.
The real risk is harming the body by bypassing its defenses (notably toxic vasculature dissemination and filtration) and harming the immune system ror other organs in the process.
I agree with you that that is a very real risk, but on this particular issue (the risk of a very dangerous version of the virus evolving) I will go with Geert Vanden Bossche for now
Ok, which of his prediction haven't come true? The virus became more transmissable - Tick. The virus is evolving with a high likelihood of it becoming almost invisible to the highly vaccinated - Tick.
Im with you on the egregious lack of aspiration harms. Respectfully, I believe there definitely ARE other concomitant harms. Just as coincidentally two separate health issues can display symptoms in the same time frame or two appliances in your house can die in the same month, 2+ harmful effects from these jabs are likely occurring in many. I see more than 1 in 20. Some have immune changes with zero external symptoms. Some an inflammatory-itis, then a few months later a neuro issue, few months later a return of a very remote pain, and then a few months later a cancer. Myriad more examples too long to list. This thing definitely knocks down many ppls immune systems. Just because all in the lot did not demise together dismisses, erroneously, their prior health, inflammatory status, and aging trajectory. Not saying I believe the batch story, just saying that argument is off. Regardless, these jabs are horrid, deadly, and a waste, just worse of course, if put IV. I agree very very low death rate, so why is anyone in team reality even trying to correct technique of an unnecessary technical, risk laden ‘therapy’? If it lowers harm, ok. But what if it just makes for a slower decline to demise? We don’t yet know this either, do we?
Agree they are a waste, could nevr work and were futile in the first place.
You need to read more about the Bolus Theory. Bc one of the Hallmarks of Bolus Theory is Collateral Damage, meaning that by nature, the Bolus will almost inevitably hit several places , and people will be suffering from a wide variety of symptoms (ASD patients are the best example). So on the contrary multiple symptoms is a sign of the bolus. Like an avalanche it'll destroy trees here, telephone poles there, a chalet...the path and the activation of the LNPs dictates the harm.
The batch story is unscientific and a fantasy to the extreme, it's falsifiable in too many ways. The most notable one: Why does everyone have tons of antibodies if they took a placebo?
It's not 1 in 20 persons, it's 1 in 20 shots. With 2.5 shots per person, it's 1 in 8 people harmed.
The Bolus Theory highlights a lot of things to help with your last point:
- not all are harmed, at least severely enough for the body to not be able to repair.
- harm is essentially on the endothelium, notably to blood-tissue barrier:
so risks are organ failure with clotting and necrosis, partial or total (that's visible immediately), aneurysm and dissection (4-6 months or immediately after a booster that finishes the work); arteriosclerosis, that's visible also fast enough (a few months,), micro-perforation (depends: myocarditis can be a few days to 2-3 weeks, Alzheimer's can take decades, endocrine disorders are complex to deal with). The past 4 decades show the way. People can live long lives with many illnesses...We might be triggering the collapse of society, by maiming an enormous amount of people,
I'd rather have some fit toddlers than fully vaxxed adult pilots! The FAA has noticed and changed the limits for cardiac diagnostic values for pilots already..
Many of us who have worked with vaccine-injured patients suspect that the COVID-19 vaccine can persist for an extremely long time in their bodies (which makes it quite challenging to treat them). One of the best points of evidence for this theory is autopsy studies of suspected vaccine-related deaths where spike proteins were found throughout the tissues months after their vaccination.
Thanks for your comment. always enjoyable forcing me to think through.
I would have disagree with you :-) , always respectfully and with a spirit of getting to the truth.
1) I don't do science on "I suspect". I do science on facts, on validated Laws of science, else we get lost very very quickly in conjectures that are more signs of imagination than any thing else.
2) The autopsies he is referring to are those of Pr. Burkhardt, I presume, and these didn't find systemic LNPs at all, ie there are no circulating in the tissue or in the blood. Check at the pictures. You will agree. What you have trapped spike proteins in the wounds. The wounds are T-cells inflicted...which circulating spike would not do. Other autopsies have shown actually there's relatively limited B-cells there...which means they are not driving the immune attacks that would go with circulating spike.
3) Some institutions in Germany are indeed supposedly finding spike Protein persistence in the blood. Pascal Najadi and a few others have shown that to me. The first point I would like to make is that if that is true, the amount is very small typical 50-150 picogram per ml, whic correspond to 4-12 spike protein facings any endothelial cell at any moment. Given each cell is defended by 13,000+ antibodies . I don't understand how that would cause harm. Only people with B-cell illnesses could suffer from that, but they'd have plenty of other problems beyond COVID vaccine spike.
4) the amounts they are supposedly proposing are similar to the amounts found post vaccination after 5 days. That means when T-cell have off-loaded all the spike produced by the injection. I don't know how that can happen mathematically. Say 1% of LNPs transfect, that 100 million cells producing spike...to get 50 picograms/ml. Normal cells have limited capacity to replicate and don't replicate. That would mean that high replication cells have been transfected, but have avoided T-cell attacks, have integrated the mRNA into the DNA, are not damaged in the process and that the spike production is being expressed...Hematopoietic Stem cells fit the bill, but that's a lot of ifs...None of this is proven at all, yet. It's conjectural. This don't think this can happen at the rate we are seeing adverse events. But even if it did, so what? You have more chlorine in the blood than spike after a glass of tap water in the US. Does that kill you?
I have alternative hypotheses that have better probability to explain this phenomenon :
a) bad testing techniques, cross reacting with other elements in the blood. False positives.
b) or to natural spike...
c) the test are seeing remnants of the attacks in the form of exosomes,
d) or somehow stored mRNA like sleeping viruses is being expressed but I don't seen how those quantities could get produced.
Given the power of T-cell and antibodies, the only possible option this is real is for blood stem cells to have integrated the mRNA into their DNA, and express spike...A very low probability scenario orthogonal to the vast number of AEs we have seen.
In all cases, I don't understand how doctors don't understand that antibodies are a reality, and they cannot be explained away. They are present and they do the job...like gravity. Chemistry is not redefined by this spike. So even if spike is present, it's not doing the harm these people say it is doing. it simply cannot immunologically, it cannot physically, and it certainly cannot do it in the concentrated way we are seeing harm...
@covidmythbuster I find your articles very interesting. However I don't understand why are you so certain that circulating spike is not possible, or a problem in vaccine injured?
It was found in patients with myocarditis 4 weeks following vaccination and there was no follow up to assert it went down.
Additionally there are now 2 German labs that are detecting free spike protein in vaccine injured years following vaccination (I have chronic health issues following vaccination and my personal Covid spike results were positive over a year post vaccine, both free and bound by PBMCs).
If LINE1 retrotransposition of vaccine mRNA occurred, I'm guessing the affected cells would continue to create their own spike mRNA resulting in spike expression indefinitely. I assume this would result in persistent free spike protein detectable in the blood years later.
You quote Yonker et al, their study is very strange bordering on fraud, bc Ogata had showed that pple beyond D9 of the first shot had very low to no circulating spike (see the median of health which is D24 vs D4 for myocarditis patients, evidnetly they still have circulating spike, but similar to what ogata found with healthy vaccinated) , including after shot 2.
Why am I confident?
Bc that's what antibodies and Tcells do. Once they exist, quickly (1) Abs neutralise the circulating spikes, (2) Ts destroy the spike factories (transfected cells) so production is interrupted early....
All the adverse effects are done by the Tcell concentrated attacks on the endothelium. The bolus theory explains all this, not circulating spike. I have written several papers explaining why.
The only way for spike to keep being produced would be via stem cells, and the danger there would be cancer, not circulating spike which is neutralised effectively (see my article on cancer). One has to do the math to see that Abs overwhelm the circulating spikevs ace2 receptors, and the probabilities of spike harming cells are tinier than tiny. I think I wrote that in one of my papers, I will need to write a new one.
Thanks for the reply Marc. Can you comment on the test results from the IMD Berlin and MMD German diagnostic labs which are now performing circulating free spike protein tests for the general public? I've linked them in my original comment including a vaccine injured German forum, where a number of users are discussing their positive results.
I personally have ~50pg/ml of Covid free spike protein in the blood, (also a higher concentration bound by PBMCs indicating my immune system is attempting to clear the spike, but potentially unable to keep up with production). I have a number of debilitating symptoms following the vaccine which I assume are associated with this. A professor I had correspondence with at the lab hinted it may be related to reverse transcription of mRNA.
I am truly sorry for your injuries. Happy to try to look into it, and see how Bolus theory applies, may be it can be helpful to your doctors.
I can quite confidently tell you it's not the circulating spike that's causing what ever you have, except if you are immuno deficient or have some serious B-cell pathology.
I looked at the translated IMD results, and they don't seem to talk about perseverance of spike (they also quote Yonker), but I could be wrong.
I know Pascal Najadi has been stating the same thing as you...I don't know if that's a misreading of the analysis or reality. Both are possible, but the quantities seem very high versus the peak injection...so something is off in my view. One needs to realise that normal cells producing spike are destroyed quite quickly once T-cells are primed.
50 pg/ml equates to 4 spike proteins in front of each endothelial cell, if you have antibodies, you probably have several thousands facing each cells, and playing goalkeeper. The probabilities state that circulating spike cannot be harmful if you have antibodies...do you have antibodies? What quantity? Do the math, it's quite simple. How many spike face a cell, how many antibodies defend that cell?...
You get more chlorine in your blood than your content of spike with a glass of tap water in the US! And the idea that these spike are actually penetrating without an envelop remains to be proven in my view. Remains to be proven that a cell could not manage it with these quantities. So this is a house of cards on a house of cards...respectfully.
They inject you with tens of billions of particles, say in IV 1 % transfect that's 400 million cells producing with a peak at D5 with Moderna (Ogata). The vast majority of these cells are destroyed by T-cells. For cells to continue requires them to be immune privileged stem cells, and for them to produce as much as after the vaccine isn't reasonable. Why because after the vax many cells were apoptosised and so greater quantities of spike were released.
There's a tiny possibility that stem cell DNA integrate spike...
(1) it would remain to be seen that the gene is actually expressed...
(2) How many stem cell would need to have been transfected, a reversed transcribed to produce as much as D5 post-injection? thousands? millions? That simply not reasonable imho. May be I am missing something, but the odds are off here. I would bet they are either measuring trapped spike in exosomes, that continue to circulate,
The risk of DNA integration is imo for reproduction, bc there you have the possibility to change the entire body of a human being, and mess up hir/her genetics.
As I told Pascal, I believe as the test are cross-reacting with something else, or not calibrated properly. In any case, if you look at Yonkers, people with myocarditis had diminishing circulating spike.
There's 4 meta-pathologies:
- aneurysm & rupture,
- endothelial damage leading to arteriosclerosis or abnormal angiogenesis (fistula)
- thrombosis leading to partial or full organ necrosis: hypo-production of hormones, to gangrene, to destroyed gall bladders, renal failures, necrosed pulmonary nodes, Type 1 diabetes, ulcers, perorations, patent foramen ovales, etc.... not to forget strokes,
- microperforation of the blood-tissue barriers and the endothelium in general leading to : vasculitis, myocarditis, neuropathies, alzheimers, parkinson's, pancreatitis, sterility, crohn's disease...and to endocrine disorders (hyper production type as hormones are released without control)....
I had immuno-therapy in 2020 as a result of a diagnosis for cancer. I stopped in September that year when I worked out (no thanks to NHS) what was really going on, poisoning via sodium nitrite (E250) in bacon I ate. The harms of E250 and the products nitrosamines have been known about for decades yet the ignorant doctors never asked me about my diet.
The therapy was injected over 1.5 hrs so effects of what are in essence toxins/toxic substances would have been diluted. I also drank water before and after. I also cycled to and from the hospital (2.0 miles) which would have helped push through any poisons on my return journey (uphill!).
So like the knowledge known about for nearly 90 years you mention. History repeating itself because people have not listened.
Thanks Matt. Pleas eshare my work widely. Working on my book right now, but without support the theory will be killed and collect ively we will continue to harm our loved oned...
Monsieur Girardot, je vous ai découvert grâce à la chaîne du Dr John Campbell. Puisque vous êtes en contact avec lui, avez-vous de ses nouvelles récentes? Cela fait plus d'une semaine que John ne poste plus rien nulle part, ce qui ne lui ressemble pas du tout, et nous sommes un certain nombre d'abonnés à sa chaîne à nous inquiéter pour lui, car il a totalement disparu du web après sa vidéo sur les dernières révélations concernant le partygate. Savez-vous s'il va bien? Merci d'avance.
Mille mercis, Monsieur Girardot! Je vais en informer les personnes qui s'inquiètent à son sujet. J'en profite pour vous remercier pour l'extraordinaire travail que vous faites. L'histoire finira par vous donner raison.
Years ago my M.D. proposed another DTaP shot. The assistent gave it - incorrect as I discovered later - and I ended up with an inflamed rotator-cuff. Very painful and the shoulder never got back to 'normal". Because of this vaccine-related injury I read up on how shots should be given: either the person giving and the person receiving are both standing, or both should be seated.
To my surprise and annoyance I saw the first Covid shot given on TV - incorrectly ! with the person receiving sitting and the person dispensing the shot standing ! I emailed the CDC that I worried how this method would cause injuries like the one that happened to me. No real answer of course and the incorrect way of vaccinating continued as I show from tv, photos in newspapers, etc.
To me it is inconceivable that the CDC did not issue more warning about how shots should be given. Also, why were pregnant women, small children, and later young males - when problems became clear - not excluded until more research was done ?
I was also surprised when a pharmacy told me I could not get a Covid-shot as they needed their limited supply for 2nd shots to people who had gotten their first vaccination 14 days before. I had read that in England it was discovered that a longe period in-between worked better. How come pharmacies were not told to change their protocols based on important findings like that ?
Also, some nurses remarked early on that the vaccin had probably gotten in a vein when they read/heard that the young men who had serious negative effects, remarked that they "got a weird taste in the mouth" immediate after getting the shot. Again, why was there no follow-up ? This could be a reason for the cardiovascular events seen by young males immediately after a covid-jab.
Oops, these were basically rhetorical questions, but your answer is of course much appreciated. ! To me it sounds more like unwillingness to contemplate different/new ideas, combined with some outright stupidity. Sadly, I saw a lot of that during the pandemic.
Antoinette, you really got a very Dutch surname and it stands out. I was born in Rotterdam. As for what you stated I really value your set out as I do with others also. In my view many lives could have been saved and many other victims prevented to be harmed was it not for the Big Tech and Media to conspire with politicians and other collaborators to prevent public debate about the dangers of the jabs. The escalation in excess deaths appears to be mainly in those countries where there was a high rate of people having the jabs. That should underline it. Also, claiming that those who had adverse reaction (even death) within 14 days of the jabs were "unvaccinated" was a major problem/fraud that served to keep citizens unaware of the real dangers. As a great-grandfather many times over I at least had a considerable gull live to enjoy and I view it horrible that little kids died after the jabs and robbed of having a full life and experiences. This is why I view we need to work together, each to their own capacity, to seek to hold all the evil doers legally accountable.
Covid vaccine deaths have happened, as was to be expected as no medical action is without risk. The number of children that died is very small - but I agree even one would have been to many, as there was probably little/no reason to vaccinate children at this time.
Re. the excess deaths after vaccinations happened, this could be the result of people leaving their house again and commuting to their job, people who could not go to a doctor because of the pandemic and were diagnosed too late & treated too late, with death as a result.
I will write a piece soon on Aluminium and Mercury.
When you do the calculation, with a true IM injection Aluminium and Mercury can be neutralised albumin and other proteins. They are overwhelmed by those proteins that circulate inside the blood. However, with an IV they temporarily overwhelm those proteins and can cause damage to the cells.
This is what I found. Aluminum is an adjuvant (strengthener) and therefore not used in Covid vaccines. Mercury (as thimerosal) was removed from vaccines between 2003-2005 in the US/the UK/Europe, as a precaution. (Not completely true, multi-dose vials flue vaccin apparently still contain some. Apparently you can request a thimerosal-free shot.)
The CDC gives a listing of which adjuvant is used in which vaccine. The CDC website also gives for each vaccine on the US market an excipient (ingredient) summary. Of course unknown if these listings arre correct/complete. But an independent laboratory should be able to check for this in at-random samples ?
I found scientific sites where they list all the ingredients for the vaccines. There are no "poisons" in the vaccines.
Of course a number of people would have adverse reactions, some even leading to death, because of taking the vaccines. This effect is true for all Rxmeds, OTC-meds, medical procedures. Nothing new there.
Thanks for your reply. I have my information from gov.uk no less as to what is in the vaccines given in the UK for COVID 19/a.ka. the 'flu. This is my analysis. Scroll down for tables of comparison on Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and AstraZeneca. I do use some humour to lighten the mood and help make the points.
Vaccines contain toxic substances, poisons, and, if they are mRNA, foreign bodies. They must be this to cause an immune response and that's it, that's all they do if the body is not harmed which happens frequently.
Until the next time people are foolish enough to repeat the process.They do not and cannot train the immune system, vaccines are the biggest medical deceit of our time.
All neuro-toxic (most are) big pharma drugs cause side effects, varying according to toxicity. All vaccines are harmful if they contain anything other than saline. We cannot tell what is in each vial as they are not tested immediately before hand, unlike a soup or stew for example.
Much of our health problem stems from ignorance of how the body is made up, we are after all 75-80% water, yet people try to heal things with a pill. Many issues would go away if we drank sufficient clean water.
Clean water in developing countries has always been an obvious issue, but the same applies to us in the west to maintain our health.
I was infected with Covid early on (March 2020) so I can tell you it is NOT "just a flue". (For me it became long-Covid with all the misery that entails.) So when someone writes something like that, I am gone. Wishing you the best. P.S. Have your house checked for Radon-gas if you take your health seriously (unless already done).
If lack of aspiration is the reason for covid vaccine injury and death, one would have surely seen a decline in death rates (I would love another metric, but not sure how reliable AE data would be). This should be the case esp in a country like Denmark where aspiration was re-introduced in March 2021. Their death rate is still climbing: Pre 2020 it was averaging between 9.4 and 9.5 deaths per 1000 people, and has risen in particular over the last two years, and in 2022 it was 10 deaths per 1000 people.
That is not a small increase for a relatively stable statistic.
Yes, there could be other drivers for deaths, but I cannot help but see vaccine injury as one of them (that is the one big thing that changed) and this country should see relatively little of it since they had a really short window of not aspirating.
The Bolus Theory" isn't only about "Lack of aspiration", Hannah.
Aspiration doesn't guarantee you are not in IV anyhow: at least 2% go in IV even with aspiration, probably more.
It's also about speed of push, concentration of vaccine, dose of vaccine, type of vaccine (transfects or nor), timing of activation of product (immediate for steroids, delayed with PEG...).
What about Dr. Ana Milhacea's work showing that we are all full of nanotechnology from the jabs as well as shedding, spraying, food supply confirmation etc?
You mean dr Ana who also channels a 30,000 yr old being and says we are gods, yeah no thanks don't care what Covid truth she possibly have if she's out to lunch on more important eternal issues🚩🚨🆘🤌
I have been very drawn to Dr. Ana and only recently learned about some weird stuff with her beliefs. I enjoy her substack, interviews, and personality and appreciate all of the research she has done. I am a Christian and she references God a lot so I assumed she is also a Christian. Now I am wondering about that though.
I had a hard time being drawn to her just by how oddly and quickly she spoke.. as a Christian when I first her say in first minutes we are light beings 🚩I knew she was a new ager masquerading as angel of light.. enough truth and christianise talk to draw in folk then lure them into her books etc as many are doing
Look her book reviews and see for yrself.
When I did wow
She is nuts.. if I find again I will post .. so be careful with her
I’m sure you’re right on the bolus theory - but maybe sloppy technique has been a blessing in disguise in that it has drawn attention to all the other issues, inherent in mass vaccination, programs such as poor quality, control, compromised regulatory bodies, greed and data fraud in the trials, long term health side effects etc. Not to mention supranational power grabs. People are on it like a rash.
I don’t understand why others investigating vaccine injury would discount this theory. It actually works hand-in-hand with their work. If a vaccine is believed by one to be toxic, wouldn’t injecting the toxin intravenously be a researchable aspect of their own work? Wouldn’t their own work benefit from investigating “The Bolus Theory” as a tangential avenue of research to explain the profound injuries, cancers, and neuro disorders they claim are the result of the toxins they espouse? It seems like this theory would actually compliment and support their own research. I’m confused about the dismissal of the theory by those claiming to desire the truth behind vaccine injury.
Thank you for your work, Mr. Girardot. Those of us profoundly affected by vaccine injury are grateful for anyone willing to dedicate time and energy to the cause. I am sharing your research and work with other moms of Autism, as well as any other people willing to listen. You have a sound and reasonable explanation, impressive and inarguable data, and the theory should be respected and discussed in research circles.
On a different note:- The other massive danger from the mass vaccination program. This is independent of the damage caused by the Bolus - and the flow on effects of that. This is the actual evolutionary pressures placed on the virus by the mass vaccination program, and the direction this is taking.
https://voiceforscienceandsolidarity.substack.com/p/in-anticipation-of-a-highly-virulent
https://voiceforscienceandsolidarity.substack.com/p/how-many-more-times-will-i-have-to
Adrian, mon ami,
We have survived all the worst evolutionary pressures.
If people live like we've evolved from in the wild, ie with abundant food, and in a sane environment (ie nor living int he filth of contained animals)...we will be fine. nature threw all the curve balls at our immune system. The rest is BS.
Men think they are too important. Our bodies can withstand most BS...but up to a certain limit..
You could be right, but it is still a definite risk that under the evolutionary pressures exerted by the mass vaccination program the Virus will become much more dangerous to those who have been multi-vaccinated - who number in the billions.
No that's a fallacy.
Cross-immunity protects against that.
The real risk is harming the body by bypassing its defenses (notably toxic vasculature dissemination and filtration) and harming the immune system ror other organs in the process.
I agree with you that that is a very real risk, but on this particular issue (the risk of a very dangerous version of the virus evolving) I will go with Geert Vanden Bossche for now
Not a big fan of Geert. He's been scaring people, and his model comes from poultry which have no built-up shared immunity and live in cages.
None of his predictions happened.
Ok, which of his prediction haven't come true? The virus became more transmissable - Tick. The virus is evolving with a high likelihood of it becoming almost invisible to the highly vaccinated - Tick.
Hi Marc, Your going to love this (not) - https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Dr-Kory-Shedding-lecture.pdf?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=e213f679-8207-437a-a943-6e88460d8d6c Just so you know I am not agreeing with Dr Kory regarding the actual risk from this.
Im with you on the egregious lack of aspiration harms. Respectfully, I believe there definitely ARE other concomitant harms. Just as coincidentally two separate health issues can display symptoms in the same time frame or two appliances in your house can die in the same month, 2+ harmful effects from these jabs are likely occurring in many. I see more than 1 in 20. Some have immune changes with zero external symptoms. Some an inflammatory-itis, then a few months later a neuro issue, few months later a return of a very remote pain, and then a few months later a cancer. Myriad more examples too long to list. This thing definitely knocks down many ppls immune systems. Just because all in the lot did not demise together dismisses, erroneously, their prior health, inflammatory status, and aging trajectory. Not saying I believe the batch story, just saying that argument is off. Regardless, these jabs are horrid, deadly, and a waste, just worse of course, if put IV. I agree very very low death rate, so why is anyone in team reality even trying to correct technique of an unnecessary technical, risk laden ‘therapy’? If it lowers harm, ok. But what if it just makes for a slower decline to demise? We don’t yet know this either, do we?
Agree they are a waste, could nevr work and were futile in the first place.
You need to read more about the Bolus Theory. Bc one of the Hallmarks of Bolus Theory is Collateral Damage, meaning that by nature, the Bolus will almost inevitably hit several places , and people will be suffering from a wide variety of symptoms (ASD patients are the best example). So on the contrary multiple symptoms is a sign of the bolus. Like an avalanche it'll destroy trees here, telephone poles there, a chalet...the path and the activation of the LNPs dictates the harm.
The batch story is unscientific and a fantasy to the extreme, it's falsifiable in too many ways. The most notable one: Why does everyone have tons of antibodies if they took a placebo?
It's not 1 in 20 persons, it's 1 in 20 shots. With 2.5 shots per person, it's 1 in 8 people harmed.
The Bolus Theory highlights a lot of things to help with your last point:
- not all are harmed, at least severely enough for the body to not be able to repair.
- harm is essentially on the endothelium, notably to blood-tissue barrier:
so risks are organ failure with clotting and necrosis, partial or total (that's visible immediately), aneurysm and dissection (4-6 months or immediately after a booster that finishes the work); arteriosclerosis, that's visible also fast enough (a few months,), micro-perforation (depends: myocarditis can be a few days to 2-3 weeks, Alzheimer's can take decades, endocrine disorders are complex to deal with). The past 4 decades show the way. People can live long lives with many illnesses...We might be triggering the collapse of society, by maiming an enormous amount of people,
Interesting article re aluminium adjuvants - https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/undeniable-toxic-ingredients-hpv-vaccines - Undeniable Toxic Ingredients In HPV Vaccines
Hi Marc, Maybe you should get an interview with Dr Mercola, and set him straight, or try to.
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/09/12/covid-jab-spike-protein.aspx?ui=5bd3f6df0bbd934bafee614339a6d685842a5e2b9e89c97f54f1cf355a057120&sd=20130116&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20230912_HL2&foDate=false&mid=DM1462815&rid=1909462754
Can't access the article. Dr Mercola has been using my material for the padt year. But I have never interacted with him.
I'd rather have some fit toddlers than fully vaxxed adult pilots! The FAA has noticed and changed the limits for cardiac diagnostic values for pilots already..
:-)
Persistent Spike Theory lives on:
From: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/an-important-citizens-investigation?s=03
Spike Protein Persistence
Many of us who have worked with vaccine-injured patients suspect that the COVID-19 vaccine can persist for an extremely long time in their bodies (which makes it quite challenging to treat them). One of the best points of evidence for this theory is autopsy studies of suspected vaccine-related deaths where spike proteins were found throughout the tissues months after their vaccination.
Dear Adrian,
Good to hear from you.
Thanks for your comment. always enjoyable forcing me to think through.
I would have disagree with you :-) , always respectfully and with a spirit of getting to the truth.
1) I don't do science on "I suspect". I do science on facts, on validated Laws of science, else we get lost very very quickly in conjectures that are more signs of imagination than any thing else.
2) The autopsies he is referring to are those of Pr. Burkhardt, I presume, and these didn't find systemic LNPs at all, ie there are no circulating in the tissue or in the blood. Check at the pictures. You will agree. What you have trapped spike proteins in the wounds. The wounds are T-cells inflicted...which circulating spike would not do. Other autopsies have shown actually there's relatively limited B-cells there...which means they are not driving the immune attacks that would go with circulating spike.
3) Some institutions in Germany are indeed supposedly finding spike Protein persistence in the blood. Pascal Najadi and a few others have shown that to me. The first point I would like to make is that if that is true, the amount is very small typical 50-150 picogram per ml, whic correspond to 4-12 spike protein facings any endothelial cell at any moment. Given each cell is defended by 13,000+ antibodies . I don't understand how that would cause harm. Only people with B-cell illnesses could suffer from that, but they'd have plenty of other problems beyond COVID vaccine spike.
4) the amounts they are supposedly proposing are similar to the amounts found post vaccination after 5 days. That means when T-cell have off-loaded all the spike produced by the injection. I don't know how that can happen mathematically. Say 1% of LNPs transfect, that 100 million cells producing spike...to get 50 picograms/ml. Normal cells have limited capacity to replicate and don't replicate. That would mean that high replication cells have been transfected, but have avoided T-cell attacks, have integrated the mRNA into the DNA, are not damaged in the process and that the spike production is being expressed...Hematopoietic Stem cells fit the bill, but that's a lot of ifs...None of this is proven at all, yet. It's conjectural. This don't think this can happen at the rate we are seeing adverse events. But even if it did, so what? You have more chlorine in the blood than spike after a glass of tap water in the US. Does that kill you?
I have alternative hypotheses that have better probability to explain this phenomenon :
a) bad testing techniques, cross reacting with other elements in the blood. False positives.
b) or to natural spike...
c) the test are seeing remnants of the attacks in the form of exosomes,
d) or somehow stored mRNA like sleeping viruses is being expressed but I don't seen how those quantities could get produced.
Given the power of T-cell and antibodies, the only possible option this is real is for blood stem cells to have integrated the mRNA into their DNA, and express spike...A very low probability scenario orthogonal to the vast number of AEs we have seen.
In all cases, I don't understand how doctors don't understand that antibodies are a reality, and they cannot be explained away. They are present and they do the job...like gravity. Chemistry is not redefined by this spike. So even if spike is present, it's not doing the harm these people say it is doing. it simply cannot immunologically, it cannot physically, and it certainly cannot do it in the concentrated way we are seeing harm...
I rest my case. :-)
@covidmythbuster I find your articles very interesting. However I don't understand why are you so certain that circulating spike is not possible, or a problem in vaccine injured?
It was found in patients with myocarditis 4 weeks following vaccination and there was no follow up to assert it went down.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010667/
Additionally there are now 2 German labs that are detecting free spike protein in vaccine injured years following vaccination (I have chronic health issues following vaccination and my personal Covid spike results were positive over a year post vaccine, both free and bound by PBMCs).
https://www.imd-berlin.de/spezielle-kompetenzen/covid-19/post-covid-/post-vac-syndrom
and
https://www.mmd-web.de/mediapool/69/693400/data/Auftragsformular_X_-_SARS-CoV2_Direktnachweise_23032023.pdf
There are multiple vaccine injured Germans discussing their positive results here:
https://postvac.org/community/plauderecke/spike-proteine-testen/
If LINE1 retrotransposition of vaccine mRNA occurred, I'm guessing the affected cells would continue to create their own spike mRNA resulting in spike expression indefinitely. I assume this would result in persistent free spike protein detectable in the blood years later.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141755/
Do you have any thoughts on this, and why free spike is being detected by these German labs in vaccine injured?
Tha k you for your comment and your cordial tone.
You quote Yonker et al, their study is very strange bordering on fraud, bc Ogata had showed that pple beyond D9 of the first shot had very low to no circulating spike (see the median of health which is D24 vs D4 for myocarditis patients, evidnetly they still have circulating spike, but similar to what ogata found with healthy vaccinated) , including after shot 2.
Why am I confident?
Bc that's what antibodies and Tcells do. Once they exist, quickly (1) Abs neutralise the circulating spikes, (2) Ts destroy the spike factories (transfected cells) so production is interrupted early....
All the adverse effects are done by the Tcell concentrated attacks on the endothelium. The bolus theory explains all this, not circulating spike. I have written several papers explaining why.
The only way for spike to keep being produced would be via stem cells, and the danger there would be cancer, not circulating spike which is neutralised effectively (see my article on cancer). One has to do the math to see that Abs overwhelm the circulating spikevs ace2 receptors, and the probabilities of spike harming cells are tinier than tiny. I think I wrote that in one of my papers, I will need to write a new one.
Thanks for the reply Marc. Can you comment on the test results from the IMD Berlin and MMD German diagnostic labs which are now performing circulating free spike protein tests for the general public? I've linked them in my original comment including a vaccine injured German forum, where a number of users are discussing their positive results.
I personally have ~50pg/ml of Covid free spike protein in the blood, (also a higher concentration bound by PBMCs indicating my immune system is attempting to clear the spike, but potentially unable to keep up with production). I have a number of debilitating symptoms following the vaccine which I assume are associated with this. A professor I had correspondence with at the lab hinted it may be related to reverse transcription of mRNA.
Hi Anonymous :-),
I am truly sorry for your injuries. Happy to try to look into it, and see how Bolus theory applies, may be it can be helpful to your doctors.
I can quite confidently tell you it's not the circulating spike that's causing what ever you have, except if you are immuno deficient or have some serious B-cell pathology.
I looked at the translated IMD results, and they don't seem to talk about perseverance of spike (they also quote Yonker), but I could be wrong.
I know Pascal Najadi has been stating the same thing as you...I don't know if that's a misreading of the analysis or reality. Both are possible, but the quantities seem very high versus the peak injection...so something is off in my view. One needs to realise that normal cells producing spike are destroyed quite quickly once T-cells are primed.
50 pg/ml equates to 4 spike proteins in front of each endothelial cell, if you have antibodies, you probably have several thousands facing each cells, and playing goalkeeper. The probabilities state that circulating spike cannot be harmful if you have antibodies...do you have antibodies? What quantity? Do the math, it's quite simple. How many spike face a cell, how many antibodies defend that cell?...
You get more chlorine in your blood than your content of spike with a glass of tap water in the US! And the idea that these spike are actually penetrating without an envelop remains to be proven in my view. Remains to be proven that a cell could not manage it with these quantities. So this is a house of cards on a house of cards...respectfully.
They inject you with tens of billions of particles, say in IV 1 % transfect that's 400 million cells producing with a peak at D5 with Moderna (Ogata). The vast majority of these cells are destroyed by T-cells. For cells to continue requires them to be immune privileged stem cells, and for them to produce as much as after the vaccine isn't reasonable. Why because after the vax many cells were apoptosised and so greater quantities of spike were released.
There's a tiny possibility that stem cell DNA integrate spike...
(1) it would remain to be seen that the gene is actually expressed...
(2) How many stem cell would need to have been transfected, a reversed transcribed to produce as much as D5 post-injection? thousands? millions? That simply not reasonable imho. May be I am missing something, but the odds are off here. I would bet they are either measuring trapped spike in exosomes, that continue to circulate,
The risk of DNA integration is imo for reproduction, bc there you have the possibility to change the entire body of a human being, and mess up hir/her genetics.
As I told Pascal, I believe as the test are cross-reacting with something else, or not calibrated properly. In any case, if you look at Yonkers, people with myocarditis had diminishing circulating spike.
There's 4 meta-pathologies:
- aneurysm & rupture,
- endothelial damage leading to arteriosclerosis or abnormal angiogenesis (fistula)
- thrombosis leading to partial or full organ necrosis: hypo-production of hormones, to gangrene, to destroyed gall bladders, renal failures, necrosed pulmonary nodes, Type 1 diabetes, ulcers, perorations, patent foramen ovales, etc.... not to forget strokes,
- microperforation of the blood-tissue barriers and the endothelium in general leading to : vasculitis, myocarditis, neuropathies, alzheimers, parkinson's, pancreatitis, sterility, crohn's disease...and to endocrine disorders (hyper production type as hormones are released without control)....
Many thanks indeed for that. So as I understand it to sum up, sometimes a vaccine will go into a vein in error and cause much more damage.
As opposed into tissue where damage is localised.
Makes good sense. I still would avoid being poisoned by vaccines though. Poisons have never been good for one's health.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/what-is-the-flu-aka-covid-19-and
I had immuno-therapy in 2020 as a result of a diagnosis for cancer. I stopped in September that year when I worked out (no thanks to NHS) what was really going on, poisoning via sodium nitrite (E250) in bacon I ate. The harms of E250 and the products nitrosamines have been known about for decades yet the ignorant doctors never asked me about my diet.
The therapy was injected over 1.5 hrs so effects of what are in essence toxins/toxic substances would have been diluted. I also drank water before and after. I also cycled to and from the hospital (2.0 miles) which would have helped push through any poisons on my return journey (uphill!).
So like the knowledge known about for nearly 90 years you mention. History repeating itself because people have not listened.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/sodium-nitrite-e250-the-poison-in
Extremely well written and your graph has me sold. Great work, Thank you.
Thanks Matt. Pleas eshare my work widely. Working on my book right now, but without support the theory will be killed and collect ively we will continue to harm our loved oned...
Monsieur Girardot, je vous ai découvert grâce à la chaîne du Dr John Campbell. Puisque vous êtes en contact avec lui, avez-vous de ses nouvelles récentes? Cela fait plus d'une semaine que John ne poste plus rien nulle part, ce qui ne lui ressemble pas du tout, et nous sommes un certain nombre d'abonnés à sa chaîne à nous inquiéter pour lui, car il a totalement disparu du web après sa vidéo sur les dernières révélations concernant le partygate. Savez-vous s'il va bien? Merci d'avance.
Il a dit qu'il etait ds une zone avec ozu de bande passante. Tout va bien
Mille mercis, Monsieur Girardot! Je vais en informer les personnes qui s'inquiètent à son sujet. J'en profite pour vous remercier pour l'extraordinaire travail que vous faites. L'histoire finira par vous donner raison.
Years ago my M.D. proposed another DTaP shot. The assistent gave it - incorrect as I discovered later - and I ended up with an inflamed rotator-cuff. Very painful and the shoulder never got back to 'normal". Because of this vaccine-related injury I read up on how shots should be given: either the person giving and the person receiving are both standing, or both should be seated.
To my surprise and annoyance I saw the first Covid shot given on TV - incorrectly ! with the person receiving sitting and the person dispensing the shot standing ! I emailed the CDC that I worried how this method would cause injuries like the one that happened to me. No real answer of course and the incorrect way of vaccinating continued as I show from tv, photos in newspapers, etc.
To me it is inconceivable that the CDC did not issue more warning about how shots should be given. Also, why were pregnant women, small children, and later young males - when problems became clear - not excluded until more research was done ?
I was also surprised when a pharmacy told me I could not get a Covid-shot as they needed their limited supply for 2nd shots to people who had gotten their first vaccination 14 days before. I had read that in England it was discovered that a longe period in-between worked better. How come pharmacies were not told to change their protocols based on important findings like that ?
Also, some nurses remarked early on that the vaccin had probably gotten in a vein when they read/heard that the young men who had serious negative effects, remarked that they "got a weird taste in the mouth" immediate after getting the shot. Again, why was there no follow-up ? This could be a reason for the cardiovascular events seen by young males immediately after a covid-jab.
Hard to say.
I think it's a mix of religiousness on vx, of absolutely avoiding vaccine hesitancy, of corruption an dof political intervention.
Oops, these were basically rhetorical questions, but your answer is of course much appreciated. ! To me it sounds more like unwillingness to contemplate different/new ideas, combined with some outright stupidity. Sadly, I saw a lot of that during the pandemic.
I am with you, not a lot of intelligence is going on.
Antoinette, you really got a very Dutch surname and it stands out. I was born in Rotterdam. As for what you stated I really value your set out as I do with others also. In my view many lives could have been saved and many other victims prevented to be harmed was it not for the Big Tech and Media to conspire with politicians and other collaborators to prevent public debate about the dangers of the jabs. The escalation in excess deaths appears to be mainly in those countries where there was a high rate of people having the jabs. That should underline it. Also, claiming that those who had adverse reaction (even death) within 14 days of the jabs were "unvaccinated" was a major problem/fraud that served to keep citizens unaware of the real dangers. As a great-grandfather many times over I at least had a considerable gull live to enjoy and I view it horrible that little kids died after the jabs and robbed of having a full life and experiences. This is why I view we need to work together, each to their own capacity, to seek to hold all the evil doers legally accountable.
Covid vaccine deaths have happened, as was to be expected as no medical action is without risk. The number of children that died is very small - but I agree even one would have been to many, as there was probably little/no reason to vaccinate children at this time.
Re. the excess deaths after vaccinations happened, this could be the result of people leaving their house again and commuting to their job, people who could not go to a doctor because of the pandemic and were diagnosed too late & treated too late, with death as a result.
Yes I am Dutch, and you too ?
Covid vaccine deaths were to be expected because the vaccines contain poisons according to ingredients lists.
Poisons have never been good for people's health. But do boost big pharma wealth.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/vaccination-industry-in-a-nutshell/
Michael,
I will write a piece soon on Aluminium and Mercury.
When you do the calculation, with a true IM injection Aluminium and Mercury can be neutralised albumin and other proteins. They are overwhelmed by those proteins that circulate inside the blood. However, with an IV they temporarily overwhelm those proteins and can cause damage to the cells.
my two cents.
This is what I found. Aluminum is an adjuvant (strengthener) and therefore not used in Covid vaccines. Mercury (as thimerosal) was removed from vaccines between 2003-2005 in the US/the UK/Europe, as a precaution. (Not completely true, multi-dose vials flue vaccin apparently still contain some. Apparently you can request a thimerosal-free shot.)
The CDC gives a listing of which adjuvant is used in which vaccine. The CDC website also gives for each vaccine on the US market an excipient (ingredient) summary. Of course unknown if these listings arre correct/complete. But an independent laboratory should be able to check for this in at-random samples ?
I found scientific sites where they list all the ingredients for the vaccines. There are no "poisons" in the vaccines.
Of course a number of people would have adverse reactions, some even leading to death, because of taking the vaccines. This effect is true for all Rxmeds, OTC-meds, medical procedures. Nothing new there.
Thanks for your reply. I have my information from gov.uk no less as to what is in the vaccines given in the UK for COVID 19/a.ka. the 'flu. This is my analysis. Scroll down for tables of comparison on Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and AstraZeneca. I do use some humour to lighten the mood and help make the points.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/03/11/whats-in-the-vaccines-seen/
Vaccines contain toxic substances, poisons, and, if they are mRNA, foreign bodies. They must be this to cause an immune response and that's it, that's all they do if the body is not harmed which happens frequently.
Until the next time people are foolish enough to repeat the process.They do not and cannot train the immune system, vaccines are the biggest medical deceit of our time.
All neuro-toxic (most are) big pharma drugs cause side effects, varying according to toxicity. All vaccines are harmful if they contain anything other than saline. We cannot tell what is in each vial as they are not tested immediately before hand, unlike a soup or stew for example.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2023/03/04/pharmaceuticals-whats-in-them/
Much of our health problem stems from ignorance of how the body is made up, we are after all 75-80% water, yet people try to heal things with a pill. Many issues would go away if we drank sufficient clean water.
Clean water in developing countries has always been an obvious issue, but the same applies to us in the west to maintain our health.
I was infected with Covid early on (March 2020) so I can tell you it is NOT "just a flue". (For me it became long-Covid with all the misery that entails.) So when someone writes something like that, I am gone. Wishing you the best. P.S. Have your house checked for Radon-gas if you take your health seriously (unless already done).
If lack of aspiration is the reason for covid vaccine injury and death, one would have surely seen a decline in death rates (I would love another metric, but not sure how reliable AE data would be). This should be the case esp in a country like Denmark where aspiration was re-introduced in March 2021. Their death rate is still climbing: Pre 2020 it was averaging between 9.4 and 9.5 deaths per 1000 people, and has risen in particular over the last two years, and in 2022 it was 10 deaths per 1000 people.
That is not a small increase for a relatively stable statistic.
Yes, there could be other drivers for deaths, but I cannot help but see vaccine injury as one of them (that is the one big thing that changed) and this country should see relatively little of it since they had a really short window of not aspirating.
The Bolus Theory" isn't only about "Lack of aspiration", Hannah.
Aspiration doesn't guarantee you are not in IV anyhow: at least 2% go in IV even with aspiration, probably more.
It's also about speed of push, concentration of vaccine, dose of vaccine, type of vaccine (transfects or nor), timing of activation of product (immediate for steroids, delayed with PEG...).
There's more here :https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/when-and-how-can-vaccine-particles
you will find all the illnesses corresponding
Not all AEs are short-term, far from it:
Lung damage can be immediate, but then fibrosis can happen over years.
Aneurysms and arterial rupture takes 4-6 months
Damage to the heart can cause an immediate heart attack, or the attack can occur within 5 years.
Thrombosis can be short-term and medium term, and therefore strokes also
Myocarditis is typically 2 weeks.
Organ failure is typically rapid.
Alzheimer's/Parkinson's can take decades depending on age (immune senescence)
Sterility can be detected years later, because people don't check
VAIDS seems transient a few weeks
Endocrine disorders is rapid, and can be transient and for life.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F95c767eb-c3a2-4124-bbc0-2c0470e56fce_2540x2270.png
Thank you for taking the time to explain!
What about Dr. Ana Milhacea's work showing that we are all full of nanotechnology from the jabs as well as shedding, spraying, food supply confirmation etc?
You mean dr Ana who also channels a 30,000 yr old being and says we are gods, yeah no thanks don't care what Covid truth she possibly have if she's out to lunch on more important eternal issues🚩🚨🆘🤌
I have been very drawn to Dr. Ana and only recently learned about some weird stuff with her beliefs. I enjoy her substack, interviews, and personality and appreciate all of the research she has done. I am a Christian and she references God a lot so I assumed she is also a Christian. Now I am wondering about that though.
I had a hard time being drawn to her just by how oddly and quickly she spoke.. as a Christian when I first her say in first minutes we are light beings 🚩I knew she was a new ager masquerading as angel of light.. enough truth and christianise talk to draw in folk then lure them into her books etc as many are doing
Look her book reviews and see for yrself.
When I did wow
She is nuts.. if I find again I will post .. so be careful with her
Thanks! I am getting pretty discouraged with some of the medical freedom fighters and don't know who to trust any more.
You can trust me.
I have stuck ro fact and data, trhing to find a solution to help and mitigate harm, but more importantly to stop this 100 yr old madness.
I need your help to get the message out.
This is the purpose of this article, we need to get results fast.
Not sure how they relate to vaccine injury at least my investigation didn't bring me to those direction.
Shedding of hyper-production of hormones can be a probl for non vaccinated.
I’m sure you’re right on the bolus theory - but maybe sloppy technique has been a blessing in disguise in that it has drawn attention to all the other issues, inherent in mass vaccination, programs such as poor quality, control, compromised regulatory bodies, greed and data fraud in the trials, long term health side effects etc. Not to mention supranational power grabs. People are on it like a rash.
Yes, may be some dilution will help.
but even if you dilute the 2D concentration by 2. That's a 1.56 dilution in 2D.
So the surface concentration is still 2,660 higher than it should (4,150/1.56).
That will help, but it doesn't solve the problem.