Would you accept 5% of vaccine injections off-protocol?
The answer is evidently "No!". So why is everyone apparently okay and not doing anything about accidental IV injection. That's off protocol!
This article is a big “coup-de-gueule” as we say in France (read “Rant”) against the majority of my fellow Team Reality scientists - not all, but too many. I apologise to you all. Will most likely take a ton a flack for this, but sometimes one needs to shake the tree.
The evidence that adverse events are caused by accidental intravascular injections is overwhelming, and I don’t understand why so many are insisting on theories that have no clinical reality, nor scientific consistency. This is not a research exercise. Lives are at stake.
“ So, it’s probably not a good idea to get another shot?…”
Last week, I met a good friend, a very hard working man, I hadn’t met in some time. As I was asking about his health, he told me he was slowly recovering from a lung surgery. I was half surprised when he told me surgeons had recently cut a dead lobe off his lungs…His doctors supposedly were clueless as to the cause. Evidently, it was likely the consequence of vaccination. Sadly, after my own big sister whom I love dearly, I had to add Laurent to the long list of friends and loved ones who have been harmed by this collective lunacy...Before, we parted, he briefly looked up to me, and said:
“ So, it’s probably not a good idea to get another shot?…”.
“Probably best not to…indeed” I replied fatalistically.
And we parted with a warm hug.
You are probably wondering what is this picture of two toddlers flying a commercial jet about? Cute, but “Is there a pilot to save the plane?” kind of nuts!
Do I have your attention?
Toddlers flying a 747 isn’t any crazier than accepting that 1 in 20 vaccine shots go IV and doing nothing about it for 2+ Years. To the exception of Professor Hoïby, who - early on - was able to convince Danish authorities to re-establish the aspiration technique1 to try to mitigate accidental, Team Reality has generally ignored the Bolus Theory and focused on a series of rabbit holes theories that have been falsified multiple times, but have now become religion: circulating spike and lots being two of the most prominent ones. Time for a change else the same disaster will continue to occur in the years to come, and discredit will fall on Team Reality… I need your help to get an effort off the ground to stop this lunacy.
Contact me if you want to help. In any case, please share widely my Substack.
Imagine if you started seeing planes falling out of the sky every day, crashing in mountains, skidding on the tarmac, hitting jetways, having near misses every hour or so… And I would come to you and say:
“Look they’ve gone cuckoo at the FAA: For whatever reason, only 95% of the pilots are truly certified, and the remaining 5% taking off aren’t actually certified pilots, and some are even joyful toddlers!”
However it may be, imagine I could prove it’s actually true.
(read: accidental IV is proven: it’s real and material!).
First evidently, it would be all over the news.
Second, evidently, no one would actually want to take a plane until that lunacy were resolved!
Third, all airlines would immediately change their recruitment process or risk going bankrupt, and - more importantly their leadership ending in prison. Specially, when people would learn that Scandinavian Airlines, Cathay Pacific and Lufthansa all banned toddler recruitment (Read: Denmark, Hong Kong and Germany all reinstated the “aspiration technique”), they’d all wonder why the airline they fly didn’t also switch back to a more professional recruitment process (read: a safer injection protocol).
As is the case with healthcare, commercial aviation is a very serious business. Trust is key. Therefore compliance to safety rules and protocols is paramount. Anybody who has flown commercial knows about check-lists, boarding protocols, etc…
So, imagine after the first crash, listening to the first blackbox voice recording, they’d know something wrong happened when they hear toddlers giggling instead of a professional pilot voice running through options to save the passengers.
However out-of-this-world my analogy, you would never have people telling me:
“Marc, these toddlers in the cockpit can’t be the only reason why planes are crashing ! May be certification is part of the problem, but I am sure there are other problems! I think fuel quality is an issue. ” 🙈
…and then go on with their lives for months onwards, talking about fuel quality being the cause of all these accidents when there’s absolutely no evidence supporting such an hypothesis.
(Read: the circulating spike theory)
Even in the dystopian world of my analogy, the “plane-skeptics” would unify around this evidence, convince the “pro-plane” camp that airlines (read: public Health authorities) should abide by agreed upon rules and protocols and only hire certified pilots.
(Read: fix the injection protocol).
Of course, we would have all flights off-protocol grounded , and naturally accidents would stop immediately.
(Read: stop all vaccine injections until further notice)
We could have done this two years ago: fixed the injection protocol so that it is safe! For the past two years now, myself and many other people from Pr. Hoïby in Norway to Dr Campbell in the UK, from recently departed Pr. Burkhardt in Germany (may he rest in peace 🙏🏼) to Dr. Henrion-Caude in France, and many others, all have highlighted that reality. There was never a reason to wait…
When lives are threatened, anything that needs fixing needs to be fixed immediately.
Some recognised public health authorities - Denmark, Hong Kong and Germany2 - have even acknowledged that reality and have re-established the aspiration technique. Even it’s only a partial fix3, it’s better than nothing.
Most of Team Reality has completely dismissed the topic, relishing in numerous falsifiable rabbit-hole theories.
Beyond the discredit of obvious attention-seekers or of YouTube opportunists pushing bad Hollywood movie scenarios to credulous innocents, Team Reality’s most seasoned scientists and representatives have unfortunately systematically discounted the most obvious theory on vaccine harm root-cause: the Bolus Theory or inadvertent intravascular injections being the prime cause of adverse effects.
A flawed protocol is driving accidental IV injections that is causing disastrous effects throughout the planet, and has been for decades.
Discounting the Bolus Theory seems trivial and inconsequential to most, but it isn’t.
This is pure dementia. This would be similar to planes crashing and doing nothing.
“Who gives a damn about the darn fuel quality !
(Read: circulating spike, poisonous lots)
Apply the freakin’ protocol now.
I get it.
Talking about Quality Assurance is boring. Protocol compliance is even worse.
I get it.
It’s disappointing: it’s not microbiology, it’s not genetics. And you’ve all worked tens of thousands of hours…
I get it.
The story sucks. We destroyed the health of humanity because we injected like a bunch of fools. How pathetic! Trust me, I know I have been telling it for two years now. Taking flack from everybody. “Come on Marc! There’s got to be more to it…Give me a break!”.
I get it.
The real story is not Hollywood-grade. It won’t work to get traction, to get invited to speak to events, it’s more effective to talk about poisoned lots, about snake venom, about conspiracies to end the world, about placebo shots and elite-led conspiracies, about arcane and mysterious conjectures no one has ever witnessed…
even if these these theories are already largely falsified.
Trust me. I know…I never get invited .
I thought our camp wasn’t about instilling fear?!
I thought we were the camp of science, the camp of truth.
Telling everyone is going to die, instilling fear, is wrong. We have zero data showing everyone is going to die because of the vaccine. Zero. This is a scientific heresy committed by Team Reality.
We actually have data that suggests that many should be OK. And we should rejoice, even if it’s not the best scenario. I am the happiest man on Earth knowing my son is unharmed, and so many with him. I’d rather be called wrong and all be fine than the contrary.
Collectively, Team Reality have fallen into the same trap as Covidians. Instilling fear to get mindshare or embracing catastrophism. But at what cost?
At the cost of not taking action on the most urgent matter i.e. hundreds of millions of people unduly harmed for life. And at the cost of our scientific credibility.
What I don’t get is why most scientists aren’t acknowledging verified and verifiable scientific facts and realities. I really respect their deep knowledge and extensive experience. And the vast majority of them are respectable, intellectually impressive with an amazing experience. Good people trapped into cognitive dissonance, I presume. We all can fall into that trap. Why can’t they simply revisit their thinking? This was never a classroom exercise as many seem to believe. Real people’s lives are at stake every day. And if COVID vaccines are mostly a story of the past, other vaccines are hurting our children in just the same way.
I shouldn’t have to demonstrate that most of these theories are wrong.
The simple fact that vaccine delivery protocols are not complied with should have us all up in arms.
Pro and anti-vaxxers should all agree, THIS IS WRONG no matter what we believe in.
May be most don’t feel the moral weight of the future injuries as much as I do...
Here is a summary table with a few quick comments as to why all the theories out there are either utterly false, or essentially irrelevant to the AE discussion.
To make it simple, none of the theories competing with the Bolus theory fit with the concentrated delivery of vaccine particles and subsequent immune attack. None.
There’s many other inconsistencies, but the most fundamental is that single one.
Other theories haven’t been validated on animals, unlike the Bolus Theory.
None of the proposed theories supposedly explaining adverse reactions can explain how the vascular system’s disseminating qualities are bypassed to harm in one or several concentrated hits that will create: aneurysms, arterial ruptures, thromboses, capillary clotting, organ cell necrosis and endothelial permeability.
The evidence is very clear that:
the amyloidosis theory is nothing less than scaremongering, and - even if done unconsciously - it upsets me. Amyloids aren’t rare. What is rare is that an immune system is not capable of neutralising them. The immune system addresses amyloids or prions with antibodies. Hence, the reason behind Creutzfeld-Jacob disease is more likely immune deficiency than amyloid generation. In other words, the reappearance of prion disease has very likely the same cause as turbo cancers and shingles reappearance: a temporary immune deficiency. Similar to AD and PD where the appearance of symptoms happens with age (the immune system becoming less effective)…
In any case, amyloidogenesis theory does not fit with most clinical signs of adverse reactions, most noteworthy the aggregation in the arterial system, and not in the tissue as is the case in Alzheimer’s disease, for example.the circulating spike theory is a dead horse: for 18 months, I have been explaining that. I found as many as twelve falsifiable hypotheses4! One single falsified hypothesis is enough for any serious scientist to falsify a theory, even if it’s always hard to be proven wrong5. Science can indeed be painful.
If the expressed spike “as an antigen” is indeed at the centre of the immune mediated mechanism of harm (the laser beam on the target, if you will), circulating spikes cannot cause harm simply because they are not present (in sufficient quantity) to start with.
I fight daily people telling me “Marc, it’s more complicated…”, and they find all sorts of arcane tricks as if the immune system were absent or unsophisticated, often breaking Scientific Laws. The reality is once primed the immune system will attack transfected cell possibly even before it can produce spike in serious amounts as they should. We’ve known spikes are neutralised and hardly present post-jab2 for two full years now6. Another recent study7 confirmed exactly the same thing.
Whatever amount of spike protein is produced, it is captured by the obscene amount of antibodies circulating and actually present in the blood. The pictures from Pr. Burkhardt show clearly focal points on the endothelium in the arteries. The spike is absolutely not everywhere as it would if it were the circulating spike the problem. It is not systemic (though it can be in any organ). The adverse events are all immune mediated891011121314 with CD4+ and CD8+, not B cells and antibodies.the lots theory was never the problem: too many confounders notably reporting compliance issues… My favourite confounder is elderly lot prioritisation as the elderly at first are the ones that resist the least to the blunt force of these accidental direct injection into the bloodstream… Anything poisonous concentration would be evenly distributed in a vial, and therefore all people injected with this vial would have severe adverse effects. I am unaware of this happening ever: 10 people in a row falling to the ground. Even, if the lot theory would be right, you’d first need to verify if the saline wasn’t the cause, or the injectors, or the inject. And even more importantly, demonstrate they actually harm on animals. Contrary to the Bolus Theory for which all the dominos are proven, the lot theory is a huge conjectural leap.
the endotoxin theory is also a dead-horse in my honest opinion (I apologise to Geof, because I like him a lot). However microbiologically bright the theory is, it does not fit the dose toxicity levels nor any of the adverse effects’ clinical signs. If the endotoxins were in sufficient quantity, I would be very concerned. but one has to look at the clinical signs first. I am not aware of wide numbers of necrosed deltoids like you would have a snake bite for example. And the quantities I have told about are millions of time smaller than a black mamba for example…
the Plasmid theory is a very relevant theory discovered by my friend Kevin McKernan. However, as he himself noted recently: “I spent the time talking about @GirardotMarc work. Why? Because dsDNA contamination isn’t checkmate.”15
What Kevin means is that it doesn’t fit most of the evidence we have witnessed. And the very mechanism of action of the vaccine will inevitably destroy the transfected cells, the cytotoxic side of the adverse effects doesn’t need the DNA to happen. And so at best, it could make the immune reaction more rapid, but it doesn’t explain for any of the concentrated cytotoxic dynamics that we have witnessed.
However I believe Kevin’s finding is very much relevant in potential cancer and mutation side effects, as inserting DNA into immune privileged stem cells makes the gene modification a real possibility.
Fear Is Not The Way To Lead Us Out
Three years ago, I announced I had found a 0.01% fatality rate to COVID. I thought people would be glad and relieved. Turns out I was attacked with so much hatred, I couldn’t believe my eyes. People should have rejoiced and partied. Instead most continued into this morbid - somewhat sadistic state - that has animated so many in our society acutely since this all started…Strangely, the same unconscious morbid spirit seems to also permeate Team Reality today.
I will leave you with this table I have adapted from a research paper from 193616 on accidental intravascular injections of pollen during desensitisation .
In 1934, at least 1 in every 144 shots could go IV without using the aspiration technique according to this research. But imagine this is pollen. Danger aware doctors were injecting. And pollen particles aren’t cytotoxic per se (just like flu vaccine particles) and don’t transfect endothelial cells like COVID vaccine nanoparticles do. So it’s very reasonable to consider that many partial IV injections weren’t even detected as they didn’t trigger adverse reactions. I am pretty confident that they missed 80-90% of the IV, which would equate to 1 in 14 to 1 in 29 shots going IV. Very close to our estimate so far…
In other words, we’ve known all along, nearly 90 years!
Time to revisit vaccine injection protocols…bring back certified adult pilots like Sully!
Don’t hesitate to publicise the Bolus Theory, reach out to me and help us together change a mistake that has been causing too many dramas for too long.
The aspiration technique is a mitigation technique to avoid accidental intravascular injections. It was invented in the early 20th century. Unfortunately, it isn’t 100% effective. So more needs to be done, notably very slow injection to mitigate harm.
Germany waited until February 2022, when Denmark switched back to aspiration in March 2021
The “Aspiration Technique” is not 100% effective, and so other measures need to be taken to mitigate adverse effects, notably very very slow injection.
“Lifting the Fog over Decades of Injuries” by Marc Girardot -
Mistakenly scapegoating the “circulating spike protein” would be like sweeping all the harm and pain from prior vaccine accidents under the carpet.
for the record I had to back away from that rabbit-hole in September of 2021
“Circulating Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients” by Ogata et al - Reference
“Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis” by Yonker et al - Reference
“Biopsy-Proven Fulminant Myocarditis Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination”by Kazama et al - Reference
“A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against COVID-19” by Michael Mörz - Reference
“An autopsy case report of aortic dissection complicated with histiolymphocytic pericarditis and aortic inflammation after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination” by Takahashi et al - Reference
“Multidisciplinary diagnostic approach for fulminant myocarditis related to coronavirus disease 2019 messenger RNA vaccines: a case report” by Fujii et al - Reference
“Immune-mediated liver injury following COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review” by Roy et al - Reference
“Global reports of takotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy following COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis” by Ahmed et al - Reference
“Immune-mediated adverse events post-COVID vaccination and types of vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis” by ElSawi et al - Reference
“The role of accidental puncture of veins in the production of allergic shock” by G. L. Waldbott
Fwiw I was reading a Reddit nursing sub last year and the topic of aspiration was discussed on it numerous times and most of the people were laughing at the concept of aspiration and said that they are taught not to do. It seemed that they didn’t think injecting into the bloodstream was causing any problems. I commented a few times on why it should be done and I was ejected from the sub. I give my dog a monthly shot and I always check to make sure I’m not injecting into her bloodstream. At least vets are still teaching that.
Do not get any kind a vaccine at CVS in America.
The have no idea what the aspiration protocol is.They are not trained on it.
When I asked, for the aid to perform aspiration, she literally sneered at me.
I walked out, leaving her standing with a spoiled vax.