Such a conundrum with some truly beneficial medications developed in the pharmaceutical industry, while the majority of the major pharmaceutical companies are repeat convicted felons. The industry complexity is beyond layperson understanding, so most of us are left with medical professional recommendations. Pharma clearly is not trust worthy. The "system" of medical education is rife with pharma brainwashing and propagandizing curriculum, rendering many M.D.s unwitting drug selling tools. Worse is the medical cabal, partnering with medical insurance providers, so the unwitting M.D. is rewarded for prescribing patented medications and penalized for not prescribing. Unless one deep dives into a considered medication, it is a crap shoot. I trust my mechanic to fix my vehicle. I no longer rely exclusively on medical professional advice for my health.
The Inst. of Medicine said we had a "hidden and multiple" STD epidemic when we had 12 million new cases back in 1997. We now have over 20 million new STD diagnoses per year (at least b4 covid). Women disproportionately bear the long-term consequences of STDs. For example, each year untreated STDs cause infertility in at least 24,000 women as of a 2011 CDC stat. CDC said that 1 in 4 teenage girls has an STD.
STD is caused by morally shameful behavior: Outside-of-marriage sex.
If our reproductive system were so fragile, we would have been extinct long ago.
There are 77 million women in America in age of procreating (15-50).
10% infertility rate means 7.7 million infertile women, that would require 385 years at the rate suggested by the CDC. Obviously, something else is causing infertility.
Another fantastic piece! I think this article is a very good application of the Bolus Theory (I still think you might want to change it to "All shots can go IV Theory" LOL). I've always wondered about people who conceive a child and then are unable to conceive again when they want to( I think it's called secondary infertility). It always struck me as slightly strange that people who had no difficulty conceiving and had no obvious change in health status would suddenly not be able to conceive.
I think you're dismissing nutrition too easily. Between glyphosate, GMOs, antibiotics and other drugs given to our farm animals, soil depletion, and hideous nutrition given to those farm animals causing the Ω6:Ω3 ratio to go completely out of whack. Excess sugar and linoleic acid in our diets are the root cause of heart disease, cancer, dementia, AMD, and a host of others. And let's not forget fluoride
Respectfully, there's zero proof of your statement. Arteriosclerosis is entirely caused by endothelial damage, not cholesterol. Food can't kill your endothelium or poke holes into your blood tissue barrier.. I am sorry. The idea that our bodies can't cope with tiny doses of poison, or decompose processed foods into usable peptides or proteins is pure fiction in my view. How can we understand anything if we don't even understand, we damage our prople with these vaccines. People ate junk food in the 70s, and pesticides were bigger in the 60-70s, and their health were much better. QED.
Doctors have been pointibg fingers at every profession and sin (food, alcohol, cigarette, car makers...) and blaming everybody but them.
Not for a moment disagreeing with your principle points about the harms from vaccines and especially the vaccines that weren't. I'm saying that many of the health issues we have today, we didn't have 200 years ago. While it should be obvious that treating a newborn like a pincushion is deranged, we (the avg American) don't eat actual food anymore. And pesticides were not bigger in the '70s and Glyphosate wasn't even in use until '73, and its usage has just exploded.
As to endothelial damage, we had that before the mRNA jabs. Not nearly to the same extent, but it didn't begin in 2021. Health was much better in the 60s, when McDs was using tallow for their fries. I find it fascinating that the obesity epidemic can virtually be traced to the changeover to PUFAs. In 1960, Curly and Jackie Gleason were fat. Next to today's fat people, they look nearly emaciated.
Didn't know the name of the Three Stooges :-). Back memory lane.
I agree the US doesn't eat well. But normally the body should be able to crack this.
Being fat is one thing, being obese is another.
The idea that our bodies can't select what's needed is a fallacy, I believe.
I also agree that other vaccines harm just the same. They were just delivered more progressively to the population, and accidents were camouflaged or confused as natural occurrences.
Read my article on obesity. I believe obesity to be the combination of gut-blood barrier micro perforation (the gut can't pick and choose anymore, it takes everything in) and poor eating habits.
Pretty sure plenty of kids in Silicon Valley fed on kale have leaky guts because of vaccines, and if you change their diet to that of under-privileged kids, they'd go obese just the same.
I also think doctors have been great at deflecting to other industries their malpractices. Obesity is one of the bad outcomes of the Armageddon they are creating.
Thank you, Marc, for another insightful article. Once one understands that endothelial cells in humans have not evolved to correct/defend against largescale damage plus the realization that some degree of IV injection of vaccines is inevitable during a muscle injection, the rest is a foregone conclusion in the context of a Russian roulette!
I think your proposed mechanism is plausible and may well be a strong contributor to current rates of infertility. The data from the last few years would seem to support that. Now to think of more ways to test your hypothesis! Is there a way to compare infertility in countries that heavily vaccinate versus countries that don't? Also you could look at infertility as a function of time since the US started adding large numbers of vaccines for children after 1986 - you could maybe see if there is a correlation in the US in communities that heavily vaccinate compared to those that don't (like the Amish) if the numbers are large enough for statistical analysis. One thing to note is that adult immigrants to the US are forced to take vaccinations before they get green cards even if they have had the diseases they are supposed to be for so may have previously only had a few.
Also, have you also considered how our light environment may have affected our health as living inside under an unnatural spectrum of fake light may also have a strong effect that we don't always realize. Our bodies use light and dark as a signal for the release of hormones and other bodily functions - we have opsins in our skin and eyes to detect light of various frequencies that vary throughout the day and year with the sun's angle of incidence at our specific geographic location. Also non-native emfs do affect us (see the ntp study) and have been gradually increasing in our environment over the past 100+ years.
Such a conundrum with some truly beneficial medications developed in the pharmaceutical industry, while the majority of the major pharmaceutical companies are repeat convicted felons. The industry complexity is beyond layperson understanding, so most of us are left with medical professional recommendations. Pharma clearly is not trust worthy. The "system" of medical education is rife with pharma brainwashing and propagandizing curriculum, rendering many M.D.s unwitting drug selling tools. Worse is the medical cabal, partnering with medical insurance providers, so the unwitting M.D. is rewarded for prescribing patented medications and penalized for not prescribing. Unless one deep dives into a considered medication, it is a crap shoot. I trust my mechanic to fix my vehicle. I no longer rely exclusively on medical professional advice for my health.
The Inst. of Medicine said we had a "hidden and multiple" STD epidemic when we had 12 million new cases back in 1997. We now have over 20 million new STD diagnoses per year (at least b4 covid). Women disproportionately bear the long-term consequences of STDs. For example, each year untreated STDs cause infertility in at least 24,000 women as of a 2011 CDC stat. CDC said that 1 in 4 teenage girls has an STD.
Shaming people is their way of shifting the blame.
I was responding to your statement, "Sexually transmitted diseases have always existed and aren’t more prevalent today than they were before."
Thanks so much for the data.
This is so typical of the CDC!
STD is caused by morally shameful behavior: Outside-of-marriage sex.
If our reproductive system were so fragile, we would have been extinct long ago.
There are 77 million women in America in age of procreating (15-50).
10% infertility rate means 7.7 million infertile women, that would require 385 years at the rate suggested by the CDC. Obviously, something else is causing infertility.
Young women are at an increased risk of STDs due to immature cervical cells. Another thing they don't tell women in so-called "comprehensive" sex ed.
Another fantastic piece! I think this article is a very good application of the Bolus Theory (I still think you might want to change it to "All shots can go IV Theory" LOL). I've always wondered about people who conceive a child and then are unable to conceive again when they want to( I think it's called secondary infertility). It always struck me as slightly strange that people who had no difficulty conceiving and had no obvious change in health status would suddenly not be able to conceive.
I think you're dismissing nutrition too easily. Between glyphosate, GMOs, antibiotics and other drugs given to our farm animals, soil depletion, and hideous nutrition given to those farm animals causing the Ω6:Ω3 ratio to go completely out of whack. Excess sugar and linoleic acid in our diets are the root cause of heart disease, cancer, dementia, AMD, and a host of others. And let's not forget fluoride
Respectfully, there's zero proof of your statement. Arteriosclerosis is entirely caused by endothelial damage, not cholesterol. Food can't kill your endothelium or poke holes into your blood tissue barrier.. I am sorry. The idea that our bodies can't cope with tiny doses of poison, or decompose processed foods into usable peptides or proteins is pure fiction in my view. How can we understand anything if we don't even understand, we damage our prople with these vaccines. People ate junk food in the 70s, and pesticides were bigger in the 60-70s, and their health were much better. QED.
Doctors have been pointibg fingers at every profession and sin (food, alcohol, cigarette, car makers...) and blaming everybody but them.
We evolved for low dose poisons.
Not for a moment disagreeing with your principle points about the harms from vaccines and especially the vaccines that weren't. I'm saying that many of the health issues we have today, we didn't have 200 years ago. While it should be obvious that treating a newborn like a pincushion is deranged, we (the avg American) don't eat actual food anymore. And pesticides were not bigger in the '70s and Glyphosate wasn't even in use until '73, and its usage has just exploded.
As to endothelial damage, we had that before the mRNA jabs. Not nearly to the same extent, but it didn't begin in 2021. Health was much better in the 60s, when McDs was using tallow for their fries. I find it fascinating that the obesity epidemic can virtually be traced to the changeover to PUFAs. In 1960, Curly and Jackie Gleason were fat. Next to today's fat people, they look nearly emaciated.
Didn't know the name of the Three Stooges :-). Back memory lane.
I agree the US doesn't eat well. But normally the body should be able to crack this.
Being fat is one thing, being obese is another.
The idea that our bodies can't select what's needed is a fallacy, I believe.
I also agree that other vaccines harm just the same. They were just delivered more progressively to the population, and accidents were camouflaged or confused as natural occurrences.
Read my article on obesity. I believe obesity to be the combination of gut-blood barrier micro perforation (the gut can't pick and choose anymore, it takes everything in) and poor eating habits.
Pretty sure plenty of kids in Silicon Valley fed on kale have leaky guts because of vaccines, and if you change their diet to that of under-privileged kids, they'd go obese just the same.
I also think doctors have been great at deflecting to other industries their malpractices. Obesity is one of the bad outcomes of the Armageddon they are creating.
Thank you, Marc, for another insightful article. Once one understands that endothelial cells in humans have not evolved to correct/defend against largescale damage plus the realization that some degree of IV injection of vaccines is inevitable during a muscle injection, the rest is a foregone conclusion in the context of a Russian roulette!
I know. And the evidence is there, everywhere for everyone to see.
But I am getting so much pushback.
I think your proposed mechanism is plausible and may well be a strong contributor to current rates of infertility. The data from the last few years would seem to support that. Now to think of more ways to test your hypothesis! Is there a way to compare infertility in countries that heavily vaccinate versus countries that don't? Also you could look at infertility as a function of time since the US started adding large numbers of vaccines for children after 1986 - you could maybe see if there is a correlation in the US in communities that heavily vaccinate compared to those that don't (like the Amish) if the numbers are large enough for statistical analysis. One thing to note is that adult immigrants to the US are forced to take vaccinations before they get green cards even if they have had the diseases they are supposed to be for so may have previously only had a few.
Also, have you also considered how our light environment may have affected our health as living inside under an unnatural spectrum of fake light may also have a strong effect that we don't always realize. Our bodies use light and dark as a signal for the release of hormones and other bodily functions - we have opsins in our skin and eyes to detect light of various frequencies that vary throughout the day and year with the sun's angle of incidence at our specific geographic location. Also non-native emfs do affect us (see the ntp study) and have been gradually increasing in our environment over the past 100+ years.