Yes, these days we have far more confidence, respect and faith in our intuition. Excellent advice. Unfortunately we cannot always change the past, but lessons of trusting intuition become very powerful with experience and you learn to question most things. If only we could go back .... We are stronger in many ways, but also weary, especially my mum facing the daily, the hourly struggle of pain and confinement, we, as you understand, continue to sift back and forth through the maze of chronic health and disability searching for the best path to follow. Thank you for sharing your story. All the best.
Free speech is not enough. It should be illegal for any government to knowingly lie to/conduct PsyOps against its own citizens, even for benign purposes. Nominally-democratic governments that actively shape their citizens' opinions are not, in fact, democracies. They're covert, de facto authoritarian governments.
I wrote this 4 days ago (1/5/24) with regard to the Amos Miller situation (an Amish farmer being harassed for selling farm products without government-mandated processing), whose products were seized by Pennsylvania authorities a few days ago:
At least government is consistent. They regulate an industry, whether it's pharma or farms, and use their regulatory authority to force us to consume only those products that get the government seal of approval. If they're going to use their lawful authority (if that's what it is) to functionally control our consumption (we, who are supposed to be "free" to choose what we wish to consume), maybe the authority should be withdrawn. Government can still create standards, and producers could still have their products certified as meeting them, but certification would be voluntary, and producers who don't volunteer don't get to advertise their products as "certified." No other benefit (such as limited liability) should be extended to those producers whose goods are certified, as benefits beyond certification itself would give those producers an unfair advantage.
"Indeed, a dysfunctional hyper-potent centralize system is self-feeding and can only be stopped by its own chaotic and harmful demise. That’s why distributed systems are always more resilient, adaptive and harmonious. If one policy or one choice fails, other choices, other decisions and other references are here to benchmark, to innovate and to progress, and no generalized collapse occurs."
The point of the federal system of confederated of states established in the US Constitution by its authors was meant to provide this sort of decentralization. Every State was its own laboratory conducting experiments in government, free to borrow "best practices" from those States that had policy successes, and they could avoid the failed policies of other States. As the US became more centralized, and policy began to be dictated from Washington D.C., the "generalized collapse" began. (The 17th Amendment being the gateway to the collapse, as it removed representation of the States as geo-political entities from Congress, allowing for the direct election of Senators, who now represent the same constituency represented in the House. The purpose of having a bicameral legislature - with one chamber being controlled by the States, where they were able to resist centralization and defend "states' rights" - was destroyed.)
Despite the obvious loss and agony Marc, you are an incredible testament to the libertarian values of your dear Stefan and the hard working legacy and love for your father. I am so grateful for your conviction and commitment to helping us, people you don't even really know, particularly children born and unborn, as you so aptly describe it 'from this lunacy'. I will continue to do my best to share the Bolus theory with anyone willing to listen...... I trust more and more readers, and others can support you in the publishing of your work and life circumstances. I watched an interview of your friend .....I'm sure Stefan would admire your work, but also hug his friend and agree, like the fall of the Berlin Wall, we need an end to this mandate madness.🌱 May you feel empowered by his example and memory. And thank you for this article, it means a lot to have these ideas reinforced.
I really enjoyed this article Marc, because you actually sum up what has been on my mind for a very long time about institutions. There is zero incentive to improve, correct or create in an institution. You will suffer on many fronts if you try. You have to have the charisma of Jesus and the fortitude of a superhero to perservere inside one. And yet we see how these juggernauts continue rolling on with their destruction. And the destruction chips away at the human spirit and turns people into slaves and drones. Whenever I watch the news on TV I become enraged at the extremely narrow perspective taken by the mouthpieces that seem to have sold their souls. It's agonizing to behold.
It sounds as if you have lived a charmed life, full of experiences well past my financial ability. Your story, while sad, was also quite entitled. I have not traveled extensively. I have never seen Europe, slopes or otherwise. I am an 100% disabled old woman, living on $1,400.00 a month. Not really very romantic, but I responded to your appeal. Do you live in a 1 bedroom, 1 bathroom house? I do.
I think that I am finished here. Substack is obviously well above my pay grade.
We have realised that the injections they called Covid Vax are not only useless but frequently harmful if not DEADLY. Hence all the many 'Excess Deaths' that politicians don't want to discuss!
The World Health Organisation is now terminated because they are out of control, evil and corrupted by their main sponsor = benefactor = INFLUENCER (Gates) who has dreams of world domination.
Over their DEAD BODIES! Mick. (Unjabbed to live longer!)
Sorry to hear about your friend. I have a university friend ( aged 54) diagnosed with a glioblastoma last year. I presume, from all I know about him, that he did take the shots. I’ve done some reading and reached out with what I found out, but neither he nor his wife has replied ( and I didn’t mention covid or vaccines at all) so I presume they are not ready to hear it. Such a shame.
I also read How to Starve Cancer and kill it with ferroptosis by Jane McLelland and Surviving Cancer, Covid-19, and Disease: The Repurposed Drug Revolution
There are three well known long term survivors who were all interviewed by Dr Anthony Chaffee on his podcast The Plant Free MD - Andrew Scarborough ( episode 94 and the most well known, also a research scientist working with Isabella Cooper aka Bella Mitochondria), Pablo Kelly (episode 125), Logan Sneed ( episode 138).
This predisposition of inordinate wealth to move into and use pharma must be first exposed and second stop gaped. Huge resources are used and moved with no tax implications through "Foundations" and/or like philanthropic vehicles. Unfortunately there is a similar environment for religious' organizations. We have taxes or we do not. Once we allow tax free business where would you suspect big money to flow ?
Just quickly glancing over your schema, and coincidentally just having read another substacker's presentation on IVM and research with cancer, I thought I'd forward you the link as I didn't see it in your information:
It must have been wonderful to have known a man like Stephan. Sorry for your loss of a beloved. I fully agree with what you say in the article.. I have long been an avid defender of free speech. It amazes me that people throw this only safeguard we have against psychopaths away, without a care. If we don't have free speech, it essentially means we have no freedom at all. We also must uphold body autonomy. With the mandates all that went out the window. And those of us who chose otherwise than the mandates were persecuted and denied recognition and services. Yes there is fallibility and the only way to counter that is through freedom of speech. There is something else that needs to be addressed - something that is rarely if ever addressed, something that is assumed everyone feels the same about. And that is law. The idea that people must obey the written word, whether they consent or not is an aberration of nature. It's inhuman. It opens the door for corruption. It makes for grotesque perturbations like the ones you mention in this article -plus many more. The idea that directives and restrictions written on paper can ever encompass the span of human breadth is puerile - and makes absolutely no sense. That two dimensional paperwork outweighs four dimensional beings. It's just perverse and only plays into the hands of control freaks who want to rule over others. It gives those kinds of people dominion over peaceful, reasonable people. It is unethical yet almost everyone (except anarchists) live by this code. It should actually be thought of as immoral to be directed by paperwork. That goes for the constitution too. The written word can only provide guidelines. But nothing should be banned. We are not children, we do not need someone to tell us what is safe and what is not. If we had free speech, we could learn about everything ourselves and make our own informed decisions. Free speech is the bulwark of freedom. Do not throw it away! Condemn censorship whenever it rears itself. Law itself is the violator. https://reloveution.substack.com/p/law-itself-is-the-violator
Thank you,
Yes, these days we have far more confidence, respect and faith in our intuition. Excellent advice. Unfortunately we cannot always change the past, but lessons of trusting intuition become very powerful with experience and you learn to question most things. If only we could go back .... We are stronger in many ways, but also weary, especially my mum facing the daily, the hourly struggle of pain and confinement, we, as you understand, continue to sift back and forth through the maze of chronic health and disability searching for the best path to follow. Thank you for sharing your story. All the best.
Free speech is not enough. It should be illegal for any government to knowingly lie to/conduct PsyOps against its own citizens, even for benign purposes. Nominally-democratic governments that actively shape their citizens' opinions are not, in fact, democracies. They're covert, de facto authoritarian governments.
I wrote this 4 days ago (1/5/24) with regard to the Amos Miller situation (an Amish farmer being harassed for selling farm products without government-mandated processing), whose products were seized by Pennsylvania authorities a few days ago:
At least government is consistent. They regulate an industry, whether it's pharma or farms, and use their regulatory authority to force us to consume only those products that get the government seal of approval. If they're going to use their lawful authority (if that's what it is) to functionally control our consumption (we, who are supposed to be "free" to choose what we wish to consume), maybe the authority should be withdrawn. Government can still create standards, and producers could still have their products certified as meeting them, but certification would be voluntary, and producers who don't volunteer don't get to advertise their products as "certified." No other benefit (such as limited liability) should be extended to those producers whose goods are certified, as benefits beyond certification itself would give those producers an unfair advantage.
"Indeed, a dysfunctional hyper-potent centralize system is self-feeding and can only be stopped by its own chaotic and harmful demise. That’s why distributed systems are always more resilient, adaptive and harmonious. If one policy or one choice fails, other choices, other decisions and other references are here to benchmark, to innovate and to progress, and no generalized collapse occurs."
The point of the federal system of confederated of states established in the US Constitution by its authors was meant to provide this sort of decentralization. Every State was its own laboratory conducting experiments in government, free to borrow "best practices" from those States that had policy successes, and they could avoid the failed policies of other States. As the US became more centralized, and policy began to be dictated from Washington D.C., the "generalized collapse" began. (The 17th Amendment being the gateway to the collapse, as it removed representation of the States as geo-political entities from Congress, allowing for the direct election of Senators, who now represent the same constituency represented in the House. The purpose of having a bicameral legislature - with one chamber being controlled by the States, where they were able to resist centralization and defend "states' rights" - was destroyed.)
Despite the obvious loss and agony Marc, you are an incredible testament to the libertarian values of your dear Stefan and the hard working legacy and love for your father. I am so grateful for your conviction and commitment to helping us, people you don't even really know, particularly children born and unborn, as you so aptly describe it 'from this lunacy'. I will continue to do my best to share the Bolus theory with anyone willing to listen...... I trust more and more readers, and others can support you in the publishing of your work and life circumstances. I watched an interview of your friend .....I'm sure Stefan would admire your work, but also hug his friend and agree, like the fall of the Berlin Wall, we need an end to this mandate madness.🌱 May you feel empowered by his example and memory. And thank you for this article, it means a lot to have these ideas reinforced.
I am sorry for your loss. You should check out Andrew Scarborough who is surviving terminal brain cancer 8 years with a carnivorous ketogenic diet.
https://youtu.be/Rd0oOXmF3JE?si=yKAC8jHHbqE8X__1
:(
I really enjoyed this article Marc, because you actually sum up what has been on my mind for a very long time about institutions. There is zero incentive to improve, correct or create in an institution. You will suffer on many fronts if you try. You have to have the charisma of Jesus and the fortitude of a superhero to perservere inside one. And yet we see how these juggernauts continue rolling on with their destruction. And the destruction chips away at the human spirit and turns people into slaves and drones. Whenever I watch the news on TV I become enraged at the extremely narrow perspective taken by the mouthpieces that seem to have sold their souls. It's agonizing to behold.
Anyway, thanks for your openness and insight.
It sounds as if you have lived a charmed life, full of experiences well past my financial ability. Your story, while sad, was also quite entitled. I have not traveled extensively. I have never seen Europe, slopes or otherwise. I am an 100% disabled old woman, living on $1,400.00 a month. Not really very romantic, but I responded to your appeal. Do you live in a 1 bedroom, 1 bathroom house? I do.
I think that I am finished here. Substack is obviously well above my pay grade.
Rest in peace Stefan. Rest easy.💕
I’m sorry for your loss. I had a friend die from a glioblastoma two weeks ago :(
Did you know RFK Jr. is suing cell phone companies alleging that cell radiation is causing these brain tumors?
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/rfk-jr-the-defender-podcast/id1552000243?i=1000568063535
We have realised that the injections they called Covid Vax are not only useless but frequently harmful if not DEADLY. Hence all the many 'Excess Deaths' that politicians don't want to discuss!
The World Health Organisation is now terminated because they are out of control, evil and corrupted by their main sponsor = benefactor = INFLUENCER (Gates) who has dreams of world domination.
Over their DEAD BODIES! Mick. (Unjabbed to live longer!)
Sorry to hear about your friend. I have a university friend ( aged 54) diagnosed with a glioblastoma last year. I presume, from all I know about him, that he did take the shots. I’ve done some reading and reached out with what I found out, but neither he nor his wife has replied ( and I didn’t mention covid or vaccines at all) so I presume they are not ready to hear it. Such a shame.
Here is what I researched
https://covid19criticalcare.com/reviews-and-monographs/cancer-care/ This is Paul Marik’s book and I have the paperback.
I also read How to Starve Cancer and kill it with ferroptosis by Jane McLelland and Surviving Cancer, Covid-19, and Disease: The Repurposed Drug Revolution
There are three well known long term survivors who were all interviewed by Dr Anthony Chaffee on his podcast The Plant Free MD - Andrew Scarborough ( episode 94 and the most well known, also a research scientist working with Isabella Cooper aka Bella Mitochondria), Pablo Kelly (episode 125), Logan Sneed ( episode 138).
Also podcasts with Thomas Seyfried.
This predisposition of inordinate wealth to move into and use pharma must be first exposed and second stop gaped. Huge resources are used and moved with no tax implications through "Foundations" and/or like philanthropic vehicles. Unfortunately there is a similar environment for religious' organizations. We have taxes or we do not. Once we allow tax free business where would you suspect big money to flow ?
Marc, I am so sorry for your loss.
Just quickly glancing over your schema, and coincidentally just having read another substacker's presentation on IVM and research with cancer, I thought I'd forward you the link as I didn't see it in your information:
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/ivermectin-and-cancer-it-has-at-least-2b5
Best regards,
Marc I tried to subscribe and pay a year, filled out the credit card information, received your confirmation yet it never was processed.
I don't have PayPal.
What's next?
It must have been wonderful to have known a man like Stephan. Sorry for your loss of a beloved. I fully agree with what you say in the article.. I have long been an avid defender of free speech. It amazes me that people throw this only safeguard we have against psychopaths away, without a care. If we don't have free speech, it essentially means we have no freedom at all. We also must uphold body autonomy. With the mandates all that went out the window. And those of us who chose otherwise than the mandates were persecuted and denied recognition and services. Yes there is fallibility and the only way to counter that is through freedom of speech. There is something else that needs to be addressed - something that is rarely if ever addressed, something that is assumed everyone feels the same about. And that is law. The idea that people must obey the written word, whether they consent or not is an aberration of nature. It's inhuman. It opens the door for corruption. It makes for grotesque perturbations like the ones you mention in this article -plus many more. The idea that directives and restrictions written on paper can ever encompass the span of human breadth is puerile - and makes absolutely no sense. That two dimensional paperwork outweighs four dimensional beings. It's just perverse and only plays into the hands of control freaks who want to rule over others. It gives those kinds of people dominion over peaceful, reasonable people. It is unethical yet almost everyone (except anarchists) live by this code. It should actually be thought of as immoral to be directed by paperwork. That goes for the constitution too. The written word can only provide guidelines. But nothing should be banned. We are not children, we do not need someone to tell us what is safe and what is not. If we had free speech, we could learn about everything ourselves and make our own informed decisions. Free speech is the bulwark of freedom. Do not throw it away! Condemn censorship whenever it rears itself. Law itself is the violator. https://reloveution.substack.com/p/law-itself-is-the-violator