Aquí en Perú, vivo en Lima, ha comenzado obligación cuarta dosis , .Yo indignada. mís tíos ,my uncles de 80 dos de ellos, ya se lo pusieron. Sin el çarnet con 3 dosis No puedes entrar a un banco, a un Mall. .So did some friends. Local papers tv news promote 4 dosis. They say "4 wave began , we must.." I will try translate this artic. And share here..many people No idea of this.
Es locura total. Hay tanto peligro en tomar las vacunas. Por lo menos hay que decirle a la gentse de hacer la injeccion muy lentamente (1 min) si no pueda evitarla
De vez en cuando, la injeccion se hace directement, pour parte or totalemente en el esistema vascular. Las LNPs transfectant la pared endotelial de manera concentrada, y cuando esistema immunitario attaqua, el dano puede ser irreparable.
"People who've had mild illness develop antibody-producing cells that can last lifetime. The findings, published May 24 in the journal Nature, suggest mild cases of COVID leave those infected with lasting antibody protection & repeated bouts of illness are likely to be uncommon. Artificially inflated antibodies triggered by booster shots signal to your body that you’re always infected & resulting immune response could prove to be detrimental to your health COVID shots are associated with liver injury, including liver failure that led to a liver transplant Children are at extremely low risk of serious illness from COVID & CDC data show COVID case rates among children who received 2 COVID shots are now higher than rates in children who didn't get the shot
"This should be telling to politicians who want to force these mandates as to the risk they are taking with the population and as to their responsibility."
They don't care. This was never about health or public safety (as if there is such a thing.) This was always about power and money, and it still is. The big difference now is that these people know they are responsible for millions of needless deaths so far, and it could become many millions more. They know that if they don't crush us, and totally overthrow our freedom, there will be a Nuremberg 2.0, and it will not end well for those who perpetrated this travesty.
At this point, I believe they are thinking that they had better all hang together, or they will surely hang separately.
This is a great article. I've been telling people that it's NOT good/optimal to have way high antibody titers for months and months on end. And that our antibody levels to covid SHOULD wane after infection. But it's the reductionist view of antibodies being "most important" that we have thrown out the other immune system players out, as well as the fact that our immune systems have quietly done very well against many/most viruses in the past. I mean, we are still here.
Also reductionist - using mRNA to stimulate the immune system instead of the whole virus,
Only relying on one protein of sars-cov2 to present to our immune system via vaccination...
Reductionist thinking seldom creates lasting positive outcomes, particularly within complex systems. The human body is a very, very complex system.
Re: Several comments mentioning clotting. Lately embalmers are going public with descriptions and pictures of ropey red and white blood clots in arteries and veins. White clots of platelets are described in the literature as a sometime side effect of heparin treatment.
Please read "What happens with the billions of nanoparticles you're now host to?". It explains endothelial cell damage I believe by LNO transfection and Tcell attack, some believe by spike. Timing of many sudden deaths suggests it's more Tcell related. Also believe not many spike get produced past jab1 for Unrecovered, and Recovered probably produced quasi zero spike (if healthy).
Any thoughts about Covid Induced high Factor H Antibody? Do u have anything for me to read on this or thoughts on it? It appears it is causing aHUS. I am attempting to find a link. Thanks for any commentary or dots you can connect thx
I have read a few. But to me this is not the real cause either rin the vax or the illness.
The real cause is likely endothelial damage, and the internal bleeding that goes with it. When the vaccine or the virus ends up in large quantity in the blood, both will trigger exactly the same process, endothelial cells will be penetrated, foreign-material markers expressed outside these cells, T-cells will attack and the cells will self-destruct. Read my NanoParticles article for more :-)
Hi Marc thanks a lot for all these enlightening articles. Not being a specialist, I am not sure to understand this one :
"After the second shot, it is likely that limited amounts of spike are produced as T-cells rapidly destroy production capacity. Thus, for most of us, large quantities of antibodies will inevitably be left idle circulating aimlessly".
Because if the spike production capacity is destroyed rapidly, there should be less antibodies right (assuming the presence of spike triggers them)? So shouldn't the number of antibodies decrease with the number of shots, thanks to T-cells?
For sure I am missing a piece of the puzzle :o) so if you could point me to another resource explaining this point in particular I'd be grateful.
Thank you for what you are doing for us with others, I am not kidding when I say that it probably saved lives or at least good health in my family.
Thank you for your interesting comment. On the Spike protein production reduction, this is my own assumption. But it's a known fact that Tcells can be very quick and effective. That would necessarily mean they interrupt the production cycle and that antibodies would be left idle.
Your point on antibodies being reduced is an interesting one...for now, what we are seeing is ever growing levels of antibodies, which is not what we are seeing for Tcells. Contrary to Tcells which are "alive" so to speak, antibodies are not. It is possible that they don't have a feedback loop, and that it is the new presence of spike however small that triggers a new production.
In any case, the vaccination mandates are entrenched on the high antibody metrics as a sight of immunity, that reference is absolutely wrong and dangerous.
I keep trying to help my son understand this. His cardiologist keeps pushing the shots and he has had Covid twice! He had an echocardiogram that showed stability of his stenosis and no damage from infection. Yet, she used fear to tell him if he got myocarditis from "another Covid Strain," it would be worse than if he got myocarditis from a shot. In what way is this responsible? I am beyond frustrated with the denial of natural immunity and actual science. At the moment? His potential to prevent myocarditis is 100% if he does not get the shot. If natural immunity acts as we know it can? My son will be fine. I want people to stop telling me that these shots are safe and I don't know as much as my retired Physician FIL, and BIL, a neurosurgeon. I understand alot of it and I am against them because not enough time or research has happened.
"It is a smokescreen to hide their failure and the ineffectiveness of these intramuscular vaccines." IMHO, they are using the measure of ABS production as a way to say it "works" and fool an uninformed public that wants to think they are smart and listen/know the "science" when they repeat this silliness. Not knowing the bigger picture.
Second, I am hearing stories of the vaccinated catching COVID over and over again two to three months apart. In part because they are driving the mutation and can catch it easier as well. IMHO, and I believe Geert alludes to this as well. They are doing via a different mechanism what you are writing about via constant boosting i.e., they are continually spiking their ABS before it wanes, and this will lead many of those to get auto immune diseases.
I’ve been told family/friends have tested positive for CoVid twice months apart. They insist it’s true and I’m not going to be able talk them through the explanation for ADE. Once again we’re face with an experimental medical treatment without adequate testing, time, etc. so it’s got to be a possibility if the virus mutates enough to get around a leaky Vaxx that has caused ADE.
Everything is possible. Option 1: At least on of the test was a false positive. Option 2: they had a very big dose which was able to pass the mucosal immunity (not very plausible). Option 3: their mucosal immunity waned early bc not stimulated (isolation), and thus another infection.
The whole question was were they sick the 2nd or the 1rst time?
I am not a big fan of ADE, it gives too much of a role to antibodies, and I don't see why then would cross-immunity not do that.
I am more a proponent of a recalibration of Tcells due to the vaccine, notably if the doses are low quality reasons.
Very interesting. Two questions. What about monoclonal antibody treatment? Not good when you have had a first jan? And: any data on immune disease uplift at vaccination , or is it too early for that? What the expected timeline we should see that?
Monoclonal antibodies with the right antigen (not the Wuhan for Omicron) can be useful for immuno-compromised individuals. Their dose is controlled and the timing appropriate.
I only have anecdotal evidence for now. Some post boosters. But frankly, I have no idea.
It will depend on so many factors: Recovered or not, the quality of the product (effective or not), the antibody response rate, etc... the cross-reactivity with lower affinity binding areas...
Another brilliant article Marc.
Aquí en Perú, vivo en Lima, ha comenzado obligación cuarta dosis , .Yo indignada. mís tíos ,my uncles de 80 dos de ellos, ya se lo pusieron. Sin el çarnet con 3 dosis No puedes entrar a un banco, a un Mall. .So did some friends. Local papers tv news promote 4 dosis. They say "4 wave began , we must.." I will try translate this artic. And share here..many people No idea of this.
Es locura total. Hay tanto peligro en tomar las vacunas. Por lo menos hay que decirle a la gentse de hacer la injeccion muy lentamente (1 min) si no pueda evitarla
En que ayuda colocarsela lento ...1 minuto....para decirles a cuantos pueda...
De vez en cuando, la injeccion se hace directement, pour parte or totalemente en el esistema vascular. Las LNPs transfectant la pared endotelial de manera concentrada, y cuando esistema immunitario attaqua, el dano puede ser irreparable.
Ok ...Gracias
"People who've had mild illness develop antibody-producing cells that can last lifetime. The findings, published May 24 in the journal Nature, suggest mild cases of COVID leave those infected with lasting antibody protection & repeated bouts of illness are likely to be uncommon. Artificially inflated antibodies triggered by booster shots signal to your body that you’re always infected & resulting immune response could prove to be detrimental to your health COVID shots are associated with liver injury, including liver failure that led to a liver transplant Children are at extremely low risk of serious illness from COVID & CDC data show COVID case rates among children who received 2 COVID shots are now higher than rates in children who didn't get the shot
"This should be telling to politicians who want to force these mandates as to the risk they are taking with the population and as to their responsibility."
They don't care. This was never about health or public safety (as if there is such a thing.) This was always about power and money, and it still is. The big difference now is that these people know they are responsible for millions of needless deaths so far, and it could become many millions more. They know that if they don't crush us, and totally overthrow our freedom, there will be a Nuremberg 2.0, and it will not end well for those who perpetrated this travesty.
At this point, I believe they are thinking that they had better all hang together, or they will surely hang separately.
This is a great article. I've been telling people that it's NOT good/optimal to have way high antibody titers for months and months on end. And that our antibody levels to covid SHOULD wane after infection. But it's the reductionist view of antibodies being "most important" that we have thrown out the other immune system players out, as well as the fact that our immune systems have quietly done very well against many/most viruses in the past. I mean, we are still here.
Also reductionist - using mRNA to stimulate the immune system instead of the whole virus,
Only relying on one protein of sars-cov2 to present to our immune system via vaccination...
Reductionist thinking seldom creates lasting positive outcomes, particularly within complex systems. The human body is a very, very complex system.
This is why I think the Cuban vaccine, which only uses the RBD, is the safest.
Re: Several comments mentioning clotting. Lately embalmers are going public with descriptions and pictures of ropey red and white blood clots in arteries and veins. White clots of platelets are described in the literature as a sometime side effect of heparin treatment.
Please read "What happens with the billions of nanoparticles you're now host to?". It explains endothelial cell damage I believe by LNO transfection and Tcell attack, some believe by spike. Timing of many sudden deaths suggests it's more Tcell related. Also believe not many spike get produced past jab1 for Unrecovered, and Recovered probably produced quasi zero spike (if healthy).
Mark-
Any thoughts about Covid Induced high Factor H Antibody? Do u have anything for me to read on this or thoughts on it? It appears it is causing aHUS. I am attempting to find a link. Thanks for any commentary or dots you can connect thx
I have read a few. But to me this is not the real cause either rin the vax or the illness.
The real cause is likely endothelial damage, and the internal bleeding that goes with it. When the vaccine or the virus ends up in large quantity in the blood, both will trigger exactly the same process, endothelial cells will be penetrated, foreign-material markers expressed outside these cells, T-cells will attack and the cells will self-destruct. Read my NanoParticles article for more :-)
Hi Marc thanks a lot for all these enlightening articles. Not being a specialist, I am not sure to understand this one :
"After the second shot, it is likely that limited amounts of spike are produced as T-cells rapidly destroy production capacity. Thus, for most of us, large quantities of antibodies will inevitably be left idle circulating aimlessly".
Because if the spike production capacity is destroyed rapidly, there should be less antibodies right (assuming the presence of spike triggers them)? So shouldn't the number of antibodies decrease with the number of shots, thanks to T-cells?
For sure I am missing a piece of the puzzle :o) so if you could point me to another resource explaining this point in particular I'd be grateful.
Thank you for what you are doing for us with others, I am not kidding when I say that it probably saved lives or at least good health in my family.
Hello Valery,
Thank you for your interesting comment. On the Spike protein production reduction, this is my own assumption. But it's a known fact that Tcells can be very quick and effective. That would necessarily mean they interrupt the production cycle and that antibodies would be left idle.
Your point on antibodies being reduced is an interesting one...for now, what we are seeing is ever growing levels of antibodies, which is not what we are seeing for Tcells. Contrary to Tcells which are "alive" so to speak, antibodies are not. It is possible that they don't have a feedback loop, and that it is the new presence of spike however small that triggers a new production.
In any case, the vaccination mandates are entrenched on the high antibody metrics as a sight of immunity, that reference is absolutely wrong and dangerous.
Thank you Marc for taking the time to answer our questions, very clear
Hi Marc
Another great perspective. Here is another study of how the boosters are suppressing/destroying immune systems -
https://www.immunesystem.news/2021-12-10-vaccine-induced-vaids-rising-mass-covid-vaccination.html#
Thanks Holly.
Let's get more IBSGers on-board ;-)
Wonderful article!
Thank you.
Excellent article Marc. So much so that I decided to become a paid subscriber.
That's very sweet. Very much appreciated.
I keep trying to help my son understand this. His cardiologist keeps pushing the shots and he has had Covid twice! He had an echocardiogram that showed stability of his stenosis and no damage from infection. Yet, she used fear to tell him if he got myocarditis from "another Covid Strain," it would be worse than if he got myocarditis from a shot. In what way is this responsible? I am beyond frustrated with the denial of natural immunity and actual science. At the moment? His potential to prevent myocarditis is 100% if he does not get the shot. If natural immunity acts as we know it can? My son will be fine. I want people to stop telling me that these shots are safe and I don't know as much as my retired Physician FIL, and BIL, a neurosurgeon. I understand alot of it and I am against them because not enough time or research has happened.
And the shots don't protect you from infection which simply adds more risk by taking the shot.
Denise, Please read this other article: https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/what-could-go-wrong
Continue to protect your son and find another MD for your son. Your instincts are correct! Do not doubt yourself!
Two thoughts:
"It is a smokescreen to hide their failure and the ineffectiveness of these intramuscular vaccines." IMHO, they are using the measure of ABS production as a way to say it "works" and fool an uninformed public that wants to think they are smart and listen/know the "science" when they repeat this silliness. Not knowing the bigger picture.
Second, I am hearing stories of the vaccinated catching COVID over and over again two to three months apart. In part because they are driving the mutation and can catch it easier as well. IMHO, and I believe Geert alludes to this as well. They are doing via a different mechanism what you are writing about via constant boosting i.e., they are continually spiking their ABS before it wanes, and this will lead many of those to get auto immune diseases.
I’ve been told family/friends have tested positive for CoVid twice months apart. They insist it’s true and I’m not going to be able talk them through the explanation for ADE. Once again we’re face with an experimental medical treatment without adequate testing, time, etc. so it’s got to be a possibility if the virus mutates enough to get around a leaky Vaxx that has caused ADE.
Everything is possible. Option 1: At least on of the test was a false positive. Option 2: they had a very big dose which was able to pass the mucosal immunity (not very plausible). Option 3: their mucosal immunity waned early bc not stimulated (isolation), and thus another infection.
The whole question was were they sick the 2nd or the 1rst time?
I am not a big fan of ADE, it gives too much of a role to antibodies, and I don't see why then would cross-immunity not do that.
I am more a proponent of a recalibration of Tcells due to the vaccine, notably if the doses are low quality reasons.
Very interesting. Two questions. What about monoclonal antibody treatment? Not good when you have had a first jan? And: any data on immune disease uplift at vaccination , or is it too early for that? What the expected timeline we should see that?
Monoclonal antibodies with the right antigen (not the Wuhan for Omicron) can be useful for immuno-compromised individuals. Their dose is controlled and the timing appropriate.
I only have anecdotal evidence for now. Some post boosters. But frankly, I have no idea.
It will depend on so many factors: Recovered or not, the quality of the product (effective or not), the antibody response rate, etc... the cross-reactivity with lower affinity binding areas...
Most people are terribly misinformed about vaccines.
Please see: Revisiting The Major Vaccines
https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/revisiting-the-major-vaccines