26 Comments
User's avatar
Tom Childs's avatar

Impressive substantiation to your Bolus theory! Good work feeding all of that information to Grok-3!

Expand full comment
Adrian Ward's avatar

Can you get Grok to analyze/destroy the persistent spike protein theory? It seems to be a favorite out there at the moment.

Expand full comment
Reggie VanderVeen's avatar

Congratulations! Getting satisfaction from a source that isn't ingrained with the same biases found in the presently broken scientific research community is somewhat liberating. The true breakthrough comes when said community actually does what it's supposed to do: "science" (without the capital "S" and a TM suprascript added to it).

Expand full comment
I am not your Other's avatar

Very cool. Have you thought about / written anything regarding the SV40 promoter/enhancer DNA in the mNRA jabs? I thought about this in the part about stem cells.

Expand full comment
Marc Girardot's avatar

I address, in my book, genetic tinkering. Kevin McKernan has recently started to acknowledge that only stem cells can survive transfection, and thus if cancer happens it's with stem cells. The thing is you don't need an SV40 promoter to trigger cancer or genetic disorders in SC. You don't need a promoter with high-replication stem cells, the nucleus dissolves at each mitosis, and the DNA is vulnerable to contaminants.

So it's not surprising, many vaccines seem to be triggering caner without SV40.

DNA contamination is part of the bolus Theory, but as a subset of MoH #12 Metaphase DNA Contamination (Mutation/Integration).

Expand full comment
I am not your Other's avatar

Thank you. I haven’t heard of Kevin McKernan and transfection. Will look for that.

Not sure that agrees with the hypothesis discussed on Diary of a CEO. Seyfried suggests that cancer is metabolic rather than genetic.

https://youtu.be/VaVC3PAWqLk with Dr Thomas Seyfried — a Professor of biology, genetics, and biochemistry at Boston College. He has over 150 peer-reviewed publications and is also the author of books such as, ‘Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management, and Prevention of Cancer’.

I love that people like you and others are looking at these issues from different perspectives.

Expand full comment
Marc Girardot's avatar

I am not saying it's genetic. I am saying it'd mechanical. May I suggest you read my book or articles.

Expand full comment
I am not your Other's avatar

Oh ok. I’ve read through some but not all.

Expand full comment
Marc Girardot's avatar

My theory states that to avoid contamination stem cell divide to preserve the DNA capital, just like with oxygen contamination, except there are more divisions and the contaminants can damage the chromosome in the process.

What this evasion-by-replication does is inflate the number of stem cells who respond to demand signals. Therefore there's an excess of supply. (my 10 cooks in the kitchen get you 10 burgers analogy).

If the stem cell contaminated is senior (carries more scale) that would drive a high grade cancer with undifferentiated tumor cells (think triple negative breast cancer). If the stem cell is junior (with smal scale), it'll drive a low grade cancer with differentiated (with receptors) tumor cells

Expand full comment
The Wiltster's avatar

Grok knows...

Expand full comment
Keith Renecle's avatar

That's so great Marc! You really deserve some recognition for the amount of research and sacrifice that you've made on this project. Even more important, the world needs to to realize what is being done to them by this evil big pharma cabal. Maybe now since the dramatic Trump disruption of the globalist agenda, many more will have their eyes open, and you will be vindicated. With RFK jnr. as Health secretary, I truly believe that you're in with a very good chance. I wish you success my friend!

Expand full comment
Marc Girardot's avatar

Thanks Keith. It's been very long arduous journey. Still is.

Expand full comment
Susie Heidner's avatar

WOW!!!!! I will repost everywhere. Buying the book today.

Expand full comment
Elle's avatar

I tested Grok yesterday as well! I thought about you as I asked for perspective on how to warn new parents ambushed at “well child” visits with jab dogma/coercion. He eventually agreed with me, too. Great job, Marc!

Expand full comment
David Cashion's avatar

Very interesting.

Have you tried feeding in alternative theories. Studies that don't support your theory.

Seems as though, what goes in, comes out.

Expand full comment
Marc Girardot's avatar

The rationale is mostly on scientific Laws.

Studies are more like supporting evidence.

i don't know any study that is misaligned with my theory.

Expand full comment
Becky's avatar

Wow wow wow. If only the right people would read this info.

Expand full comment
Roger's avatar

Interesting, now I hope this gets acknowledged by the masses soon! We need a health system, that makes people healthy instead of becoming a lifelong customer for the pharmacy industry!

Expand full comment
DearAuntEdna's avatar

I hope this becomes too big to ignore.

Expand full comment
Marc Girardot's avatar

May God be listening to you. 🙏

Expand full comment
Dr Maria D Olivier🇿🇦's avatar

He always does.

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

WOW!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Feb 20
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Marc Girardot's avatar

Respectfully, this is your brain trying to make sense of the unthinkable. We all have it.

But no, these guys are not evil geniuses, they are evil greedy idiots.

Expand full comment
The Wiltster's avatar

Well said! As someone else noted, "Never mistake stupidity for evil." (People like those at Pfizer are making decisions, though.)

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Feb 20
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Marc Girardot's avatar

Human nature can indeed be wickedly evil...but rarely with true intelligence.

Not that Intelligence brings ethics or love, but intelligence brings caution.

IMHO (and I can be wrong) Evil often stems from a sense of superiority based on pseudo moral high grounds. I remember reading about CEOs who had cheated their way up...they actually did fairly well because they were extremely cautious, they didn't want to get caught, so they had restraint. Idiots thinking they have the moral high ground will go full steam ahead and bring evil to the next level.

Expand full comment