257 Comments

A comment spoke of the exosome of the synthetic spike being shed and then toxic as alot got shingles which means the chicken pox virus was reactivated sitting in your nerves dormant for a number of years. Even children unvaxxed got it. I'f you look up exosomes used in treatment therapy it can get bacteria and cause other toxic harms thus is these MRNA shedding these toxic exosomes of spike? Iis it causing hypertension and hurting those with co morbidity. I researched a little and that's what I came up with based on experiences in real time.

Expand full comment

First of all thank you very much for your kind and effettive replay to my questions. Second I apologize for my late answer due some private circumstaimcies.

I Will pay full attention to your inputs completing my tour on your scripts and videos before coming back. In the mean time...

Would you plese let me understand whey localizarion of Spike protein would proof your theory of bolus ? I am not competent at all and I would really be able to understand.

Thank you.

Expand full comment

Thank you!!!!

I can imagine that in addition to an accidental intravascular (intravenous / intra-arterial) injection / administration, an (extremely rare!) partial or full NEURAL INJECTION can also accidentally occur?

That was my first impression after listening to what „Shaun Barcavage“ told Dr. Mobeen about his adverse experiences on November 6th 2021:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SobqUw7gqhs

It is unfortunate that one cannot escape this possibility by aspiration.

Expand full comment

To attribute most of consequencies to this bolus theory would be necessary proof that adverse effects are stricty correlated to nanoparticles quantity and concentration and the Number of recipients for each type of COVID-19 vaccine. Are them?

On the basis of recipients Astrazemeca would have given 1000% more A/E than Pfizer and 25% .ore than Moderna.

Moderna would have given 800% more than Pfizer. Is that what the data tell?

Expand full comment

Shocking but obviously Known from.the onset

Expand full comment
Feb 5Liked by Marc Girardot

Apparently they didn’t have enough conclusive evidence to recommend aspiration for Covid 19

It’s like the pandemic required expert evidence for the most commonsense measures.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35320581/

Expand full comment
Jan 29·edited Jan 29Liked by Marc Girardot

Thank you. Like you I have had many family and friends take the poison.

A self-interested question: if you are right, the unvaxxed cannot be injured or seriously injured through shedding, right? Thanks

Never mind, I just read your response to Scott S Manzel. Thanks

Expand full comment

Is it increased blood flow that is causing healthy young athletes to die suddenly?

Expand full comment

"But, but, but, the mRNA jabs are Safe and Effective [repeat until...you realize] that mRNA jabs are not safe or effective. Unless "effective" means ... No. Can't be. They would not hide that would they?

Evidence-based medicine with transparency was never their plan.

Expand full comment

Great post. Very interesting indeed and it seems so obvious now that I’ve read it. I had bad reactions to vaccines between the ages of 14 and 30. At 30 is when I realised it was the vaccines causing my problems in years I was vaccinated.

With me it was due to type 4 allergy to metals. Vaccines with mercury in them generally caused chronic fatigue type syndrome and those with aluminium caused me neurological injury which would start in the first 30 days after vaccination. It caused elevated emotions and I could hear old memories replaying in my head. It would affect my organisational skills and I’d have trouble with planning and processes. I’ve got quite good at picking out people who have had this type of vaccine injury too and have met drs and specialists who are also allergic to the aluminium in the flu vaccine. Yet in NZ the official line from the health authorities is that the aluminium in vaccines cannot cause any bad health issues. Even though it’s happening to drs and specialists. The health system have a hang up when it comes to the biological effects of metals. If you suggest it they will jump down your throat as though youve just run over their cat

Expand full comment

Mr Girardot if you could answer this I would be really grateful:if some damage might be due to a high concentration of some elements in the bloodstream, then hypothetically if one were to remoce some blood through a blood draw do you think that would lower the concentration? Does it work like that? Is there a slight chance of this working? Thanks

Expand full comment

Please check Jessica Rose's thoughts on a mechanism of amyloid plaque formation. I think it fits nicely with a bolus of mRNA in the bloodstream

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/is-sars-ncov-2-associated-systemic

Expand full comment
Nov 27, 2022·edited Nov 27, 2022

Marc, this is very interesting analysis indeed! However, I would still argue that the Covid vaccine may well be intrinsically very harmful. It is the first substance, as far as I am aware, ever injected into the bulk of the population that causes widespread changes in certain aspects of bodily function. I hear many reports of changes to interferon, protein misfolding, reverse transcription into Line-1 DNA, holes poked in the blood brain barrier, potential reductions in fertility, as well of course as turning cells all over the body into spike factories for an unknown length of time, and many other things. There are growing reports of sudden onset cancers, "turbo" cancers and stable cancers suddenly reappearing in a deadly form. To me this strongly suggests that far more than accidental injection into a vein is going on.

Expand full comment

Fantastic work, thank you!

Aortic dissections? Yikes. I had no idea about that.

Expand full comment

Marc, I am curious to know if there is a different immune response, somehow less complete perhaps, if the virus is first seen by the body inside a cell, rather first encountered in mucous membranes.

Expand full comment

As an MD who has done hyaluronic acid filler injections, and worried about intramuscular injection, I find your theory very plausible. One thing, though. It depends on the time kinetics of the PEG breakdown, and when that occurs in the circulation. You have milliseconds on your x axis. For your theory to work, the breakdown must occur over several seconds required for the bolus to circulate. Is that the case?

Expand full comment