Marc, speaking of LNPs and danger, have you read this Stat News article on Moderna from 2016? Here's the quote that made me think of your theory "Delivery — actually getting RNA into cells — has long bedeviled the whole field. On their own, RNA molecules have a hard time reaching their targets. They work better if they’re wrapped up in a delivery mechanism, such as nanoparticles made of lipids. But those nanoparticles can lead to dangerous side effects, especially if a patient has to take repeated doses over months or years." https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/13/moderna-therapeutics-biotech-mrna/
According to his pdf 10 months ago, based on his calculation, the number of lipid nanoparticles inside the Pfizer shot is 1.35*e13(thirteen trillion five hundred billion), while the number of LNP inside the Moderna shot is 4.67*e13(fourty-six trillion seven hundred billion), WHICH BOTH OF THEM CONTAINS NANOPARTICLES WAY MORE THAN JUST 10 OR 50 BILLIONS INSIDE...
Here are his own writings in French:
Calcul du nombre de molécules d’ARNm dans une dose de vaccin
1- Nous obtenons la séquence nucléotidique précise des ARNm à partir du
site de partage de données académiques github.com:
3- Nous calculons à combien de molécules réelles correspondent les dosages indiqués (30 microgrammes et 100 microgrammes)
Pfizer :
6.02 1023 (nombre d’Avogadro) molécules correspondent à 1.341.379 g
30 microgrammes correspondent donc à :
6.02 1023
1.341.379 × 30 × 10−6 = 1.35 × 10^13
Moderna :
6.02 10^23 (nombre d’Avogadro) molécules correspondent à 1.341.379 g
100 microgrammes correspondent donc à :
6.02 10^23
1.288.795 × 100 × 10−6 = 4.67 × 10^13
Comparaison avec le nombre de virus dans le cas d’infection naturelle
Les nombres ci-dessus sont véritablement astronomiques, quand on sait qu’un
patient est considéré comme très positif avec une valeur de PCR Ct=24, et que
cela correspond à 2.106virus/ml (millilitre)
So it is showing that there are 13 trillion LNP in each Pfizer vax, and 46 trillion in each Moderna vax in contrast to 10 billion and 50 billion you said here? Or am I reading it incorrectly? Can you please give me an answer? Thank you.
Marc, your analyses are quite compelling. Do you have any peer-reviewed publications or links to official scientific publications by others that support your estimations?
A strategy to end the Plandemic and restore our inalienable rights world wide
I started the first annual global protests to legalize Cannabis, and end the Drug War, back in 1990 using my magazine as a platform to push it. I was actually amazed that it worked. I think this was the first annual global protest in human history by the way.
That was before a robust internet. I should mention that they apparently did use EMF weapons in Calgary the other day to push protesters back.
If I were a betting man I would say we will loose. But we do have some things on our side: everyone from parents to various groups want the Plandemic to end.
From my own experience it is important to have shared primary goals/demands. With the plandemic I would say these are most important as they derail the globalist agenda and give us back our inalienable rights:
* No Lockdowns EVER again
* No forced masking ANYWHERE,
* No forced vaccinations under ANY circumstance
* Absolutely no vaccine passports or digital currency
* Reinstate all of those that lost jobs for refusing to get the mRNA injection, including all of our Healthcare workers
* Wearing a mask or getting a mRNA injection will be up to each individual and there will be ABSOLUTELY no penalty for not complying in or out of the workplace.
That would end the Plandemic which is only part of the globalist agenda. There are actually many additional things that need to be done. I can't go into all of it. But immigration is part of Agenda21/2030. I think we should demand that every single Illegal Alien that came in under the Biden administration should be deported using EVerify and screening school kids for legitimate citizenship. We should give them a stipend to cover their costs going back and stop GMO farming in their countries to boost employment and improve health.
Again there are other things that also need to be pursued: reopening the Keystone Pipeline etc.
Please read my latest essay and sign up for a free subscription. Also read my previous essays if you have the time.
I believe the main problem is the number of NanoParticles and the delivery of a non-self piece of amino-acids. But that the spike can be over produced in certain rare circumstances.
About 50% of accidents arrive very rapidly day 1 and 2...before significant quantities of spike can be produced (I could be wrong). T-cells have been found to attack myocytes.
I believe the clotting problems that can take longer are also that.
Also if T-cells are traîned (recovered, most jab1), time to produce spike is very reduced, not even sure they get to produce any.... But you still have accident in jab 2 and 3!
Hey Marc, yes I am from SP. BH is a great city. I just dont have that many good memories from there - last time in town was in 2014 when the Germans scored 7 times against us LOL
Thanks again for all the info, I still hope that this mess all comes out since tons of people are still clueless and are going for their 5th dose or something
Haven't seen this site before. It is apparent that some very bright minds are being applied to the batch numbers and what happened to them. All the right questions are being asked and the 'hive mind' is effectively sifting through the data to arrive at some pretty damning conclusions.
Having lot numbers don't mean much unless one knows where they were allocated. A rough idea based on injuries and deaths can then be made. I can't see Fizzer offering that information.
There's a missing link between the number of RNA messengers deployed and the claimed number of spikes produced.
In order to square that circle, you need to explain how one messenger can cause the expression of 1000 spike proteins. Supposedly, after the message is transcribed and the spike produced, the messenger itself is dismantled and the amino acids recycled by the cell.
I'm willing to believe that that the pharma companies got that wrong as well, but I'd like to see the link.
This never was a one time transcription. U think a virus just copies itself once? One they've modified it to maximize the number of spike. Two the mRNA of a virus doesn't produce just one spike, has long as it's operational it'll spew out spike.
I know a virus keeps on making copies of itself, but the messenger was supposed to act like the cell's own messengers which cause the wanted protein to be expressed, and are then recycled themselves. If one spike messenger could cause 1000 copies to be made, it would exhaust the material inside the cell. Something's missing from that picture. And no, I don't slavishly believe what I'm told about how it *should* work, but I find 1000 per messenger a bit of a stretch. If a cell expresses the spike and triggers antibodies, it gets killed - what point is there in it expressing 1000 spikes?
Please point to an article explaining why these messengers are behaving differently. Thanks.
Again, I am not too concerned about overwhelming spikes because I believe many have a functional immune system that will stop that quickly (Recovered should have everything to stop the production). Am more concerned with the sheer number of cytotoxic LNPs transfecting health endothelial cells, myocytes, hepatocytes, immune cell in the bone marrow...That is more scary in my opinion. I could be wrong, but the data seems to confirm that. More than trillions of spike everywhere...
First, at each replication of the virus, the 20-40 spikes are naturally produced. Say only 50 virions are produced at infection, that's 1000-2000 spike produced.
(most of that in the mucus in the case of mild infection).
The messenger was made specifically to be resilient to produce a maximum number of spikes. That why they've added pseudouridine (to avoid detection, and codon optimization so more spikes are produced). Kevin McKernan knows much more than I on this topic.
I suspect the graphene material is not present in all of the ampules and equally, is not in the same quantities in the ones that do contain it. This is an experiment and like arriving at dark green you need to add a little bit of yellow to the blue increasing it as you go,
If the mRNA caused the cell transformation at the rate mentioned in this article, the body would experience anaphylaxis and a cytokine storm. Instead what seems to be happening from reports in the field, is that the mRNA is causing localized inflammation and overwhelming blood clotting events which are causing stroke and/or heart attacks. Your theoretical musings must agree with known physiological effects.
Most of these can be secondary to reduced blood flow causing ischemia in neurons, brain, eyes, etc, once again due to blood restriction caused by clotting.
There certainly can be other effects, but I was pointing out that massive necrosis, due to inflammation that would be produced by transfection of the mRNA would produce the symptoms of anaphylaxis. It's the one thing that the jab is not causing.
Marc, speaking of LNPs and danger, have you read this Stat News article on Moderna from 2016? Here's the quote that made me think of your theory "Delivery — actually getting RNA into cells — has long bedeviled the whole field. On their own, RNA molecules have a hard time reaching their targets. They work better if they’re wrapped up in a delivery mechanism, such as nanoparticles made of lipids. But those nanoparticles can lead to dangerous side effects, especially if a patient has to take repeated doses over months or years." https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/13/moderna-therapeutics-biotech-mrna/
Yes, I had seen that. Thanks anyhow.
Hey Marc, I re-read the link you shared from Dr Claverie today.
https://media-exp1.licdn.com/dms/document/C4E1FAQEdCOYYF1sDAw/feedshare-document-pdf-analyzed/0/1638640262719?e=1665014400&v=beta&t=7lBFvBp2mEG74Nqw0kz_fMdkkkQ_qO0nkXmh78YuIYQ
According to his pdf 10 months ago, based on his calculation, the number of lipid nanoparticles inside the Pfizer shot is 1.35*e13(thirteen trillion five hundred billion), while the number of LNP inside the Moderna shot is 4.67*e13(fourty-six trillion seven hundred billion), WHICH BOTH OF THEM CONTAINS NANOPARTICLES WAY MORE THAN JUST 10 OR 50 BILLIONS INSIDE...
Here are his own writings in French:
Calcul du nombre de molécules d’ARNm dans une dose de vaccin
1- Nous obtenons la séquence nucléotidique précise des ARNm à partir du
site de partage de données académiques github.com:
Assemblies-of-putative-SARS-CoV2-spike-encoding-mRNAsequences-for-vaccines-BNT-162b2-and-mRNA-1273
2- Nous calculons la masse molaire de chacun des ARNs (voir annexe):
BioNTech/Pfizer_BNT-162b2_vaccine: 1341,379 kDa (1.341.379 Da)
Moderna_mRNA-1273_vaccine: 1288,795 kDa (1.288.795 Da)
3- Nous calculons à combien de molécules réelles correspondent les dosages indiqués (30 microgrammes et 100 microgrammes)
Pfizer :
6.02 1023 (nombre d’Avogadro) molécules correspondent à 1.341.379 g
30 microgrammes correspondent donc à :
6.02 1023
1.341.379 × 30 × 10−6 = 1.35 × 10^13
Moderna :
6.02 10^23 (nombre d’Avogadro) molécules correspondent à 1.341.379 g
100 microgrammes correspondent donc à :
6.02 10^23
1.288.795 × 100 × 10−6 = 4.67 × 10^13
Comparaison avec le nombre de virus dans le cas d’infection naturelle
Les nombres ci-dessus sont véritablement astronomiques, quand on sait qu’un
patient est considéré comme très positif avec une valeur de PCR Ct=24, et que
cela correspond à 2.106virus/ml (millilitre)
So it is showing that there are 13 trillion LNP in each Pfizer vax, and 46 trillion in each Moderna vax in contrast to 10 billion and 50 billion you said here? Or am I reading it incorrectly? Can you please give me an answer? Thank you.
Marc, your analyses are quite compelling. Do you have any peer-reviewed publications or links to official scientific publications by others that support your estimations?
Thank you.
What estimations are you referring to?
The number of LNPs are official numbers for all except Pfizer.
Fantastic. Do you have the corresponding official references, via PubMed, Google Scholar, or directly to the research studies?
Will see if I can find that. This was from official Moderna and Pfizer a while back.
Josh, read my other papers. I have detailed out what I now call the Bolus Theory.
The spike isn't a problem, the Ogata et al study and another one show very low Abs overall and neutralisation after D9.
Go to my September article it has a detailed explanation an dthe subsequent article quite more research. Thank you.
When they are giving 6 month old babies a shot with arms that are only a few inches in diameter how are they sure they hit a muscle?
The real question is why would u do that?
There's also some pretty tiny little girls under 11 with tiny arms.
Marc, this may be old news to you but if not I think it is of interest: https://youtu.be/-Y7dTMzn9B8
A strategy to end the Plandemic and restore our inalienable rights world wide
I started the first annual global protests to legalize Cannabis, and end the Drug War, back in 1990 using my magazine as a platform to push it. I was actually amazed that it worked. I think this was the first annual global protest in human history by the way.
That was before a robust internet. I should mention that they apparently did use EMF weapons in Calgary the other day to push protesters back.
If I were a betting man I would say we will loose. But we do have some things on our side: everyone from parents to various groups want the Plandemic to end.
From my own experience it is important to have shared primary goals/demands. With the plandemic I would say these are most important as they derail the globalist agenda and give us back our inalienable rights:
* No Lockdowns EVER again
* No forced masking ANYWHERE,
* No forced vaccinations under ANY circumstance
* Absolutely no vaccine passports or digital currency
* Reinstate all of those that lost jobs for refusing to get the mRNA injection, including all of our Healthcare workers
* Wearing a mask or getting a mRNA injection will be up to each individual and there will be ABSOLUTELY no penalty for not complying in or out of the workplace.
That would end the Plandemic which is only part of the globalist agenda. There are actually many additional things that need to be done. I can't go into all of it. But immigration is part of Agenda21/2030. I think we should demand that every single Illegal Alien that came in under the Biden administration should be deported using EVerify and screening school kids for legitimate citizenship. We should give them a stipend to cover their costs going back and stop GMO farming in their countries to boost employment and improve health.
Again there are other things that also need to be pursued: reopening the Keystone Pipeline etc.
Please read my latest essay and sign up for a free subscription. Also read my previous essays if you have the time.
https://brucecain.substack.com/p/we-the-people-of-planet-earth-have?utm_source=url
What about the new Novavax vaccine , a traditional vaccine , not vector,not MRNA ? Are the same concerns applicable ?
My previous answer disappeared:
Novavax should be much safer as there's no transfection and it is dosed.
However it is still using the full spike which is toxic, notably with the pathogenic SEB.
But if I had to choose I would take the Novavax.
the moth part is freaky
Hi Marc, is it clear whether the tissue damage occurs from the NLP per se, or the spike protein that gets produced?
Meaning the main problem is the carrier, or the spike protein?
Excellent question.
I believe the main problem is the number of NanoParticles and the delivery of a non-self piece of amino-acids. But that the spike can be over produced in certain rare circumstances.
About 50% of accidents arrive very rapidly day 1 and 2...before significant quantities of spike can be produced (I could be wrong). T-cells have been found to attack myocytes.
I believe the clotting problems that can take longer are also that.
Also if T-cells are traîned (recovered, most jab1), time to produce spike is very reduced, not even sure they get to produce any.... But you still have accident in jab 2 and 3!
I don't think so. Novavax is supposedly well dosed and there's no transfection going on.
The spike protein remains toxic, and can disrupt some pathways.
But I'd go for that one, if I had to choose.
For some reason I had missed your answer! It took me forever to get it, but I wanted to say thank anyway! Best Regards, Celso Balau
Celso?
Brasileiro?
I have a small part of me in Brazil, in Belo Horizonte.
Happy I could of help.
Hey Marc, yes I am from SP. BH is a great city. I just dont have that many good memories from there - last time in town was in 2014 when the Germans scored 7 times against us LOL
Thanks again for all the info, I still hope that this mess all comes out since tons of people are still clueless and are going for their 5th dose or something
My comment went elsewhere. It was enlightening and reassuring that some very good minds are being applied to this.
Thank you Charles.
Haven't seen this site before. It is apparent that some very bright minds are being applied to the batch numbers and what happened to them. All the right questions are being asked and the 'hive mind' is effectively sifting through the data to arrive at some pretty damning conclusions.
Having lot numbers don't mean much unless one knows where they were allocated. A rough idea based on injuries and deaths can then be made. I can't see Fizzer offering that information.
There's a missing link between the number of RNA messengers deployed and the claimed number of spikes produced.
In order to square that circle, you need to explain how one messenger can cause the expression of 1000 spike proteins. Supposedly, after the message is transcribed and the spike produced, the messenger itself is dismantled and the amino acids recycled by the cell.
I'm willing to believe that that the pharma companies got that wrong as well, but I'd like to see the link.
This never was a one time transcription. U think a virus just copies itself once? One they've modified it to maximize the number of spike. Two the mRNA of a virus doesn't produce just one spike, has long as it's operational it'll spew out spike.
I know a virus keeps on making copies of itself, but the messenger was supposed to act like the cell's own messengers which cause the wanted protein to be expressed, and are then recycled themselves. If one spike messenger could cause 1000 copies to be made, it would exhaust the material inside the cell. Something's missing from that picture. And no, I don't slavishly believe what I'm told about how it *should* work, but I find 1000 per messenger a bit of a stretch. If a cell expresses the spike and triggers antibodies, it gets killed - what point is there in it expressing 1000 spikes?
Please point to an article explaining why these messengers are behaving differently. Thanks.
Again, I am not too concerned about overwhelming spikes because I believe many have a functional immune system that will stop that quickly (Recovered should have everything to stop the production). Am more concerned with the sheer number of cytotoxic LNPs transfecting health endothelial cells, myocytes, hepatocytes, immune cell in the bone marrow...That is more scary in my opinion. I could be wrong, but the data seems to confirm that. More than trillions of spike everywhere...
First, at each replication of the virus, the 20-40 spikes are naturally produced. Say only 50 virions are produced at infection, that's 1000-2000 spike produced.
(most of that in the mucus in the case of mild infection).
The messenger was made specifically to be resilient to produce a maximum number of spikes. That why they've added pseudouridine (to avoid detection, and codon optimization so more spikes are produced). Kevin McKernan knows much more than I on this topic.
So what is the purpose of the graphene nano tubes and objects that look like circuit boards?
I suspect the graphene material is not present in all of the ampules and equally, is not in the same quantities in the ones that do contain it. This is an experiment and like arriving at dark green you need to add a little bit of yellow to the blue increasing it as you go,
I don't know what this is, and don't trust any of it.
I was wondering if that could be what they believe to see
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-05-discovery-mechanism-mysterious-covid-symptoms.html
If the mRNA caused the cell transformation at the rate mentioned in this article, the body would experience anaphylaxis and a cytokine storm. Instead what seems to be happening from reports in the field, is that the mRNA is causing localized inflammation and overwhelming blood clotting events which are causing stroke and/or heart attacks. Your theoretical musings must agree with known physiological effects.
Not if some of it is low quality (as proven in the Dec 2020 samples) or if it is distributed progressively into the body.
For the record, look at the number of people who die in their sleep day 0 or day 1!
What about the wide ranging neurological effects? Strokes? Tremours? Paralysis? Tinnitus? Numbness? Brain fog? Vision effects? the list is endless.
Most of these can be secondary to reduced blood flow causing ischemia in neurons, brain, eyes, etc, once again due to blood restriction caused by clotting.
There certainly can be other effects, but I was pointing out that massive necrosis, due to inflammation that would be produced by transfection of the mRNA would produce the symptoms of anaphylaxis. It's the one thing that the jab is not causing.
What do you mean it's not causing? 50% of death are day 0 and 1
Thank you
Thank you