Dr. John Campbell interviewed a health care worker (nurse?) on his YouTube channel recently who also experienced a metallic taste in her mouth immediately upon receiving a Covid vaccine, she also had other severe side effects.
There is another reason for side effects aside from the injection method. All vials are not created equal. Hacked emails showed far less quality control when mass produced then during clinical trials.
If you look at VAERS you can see a pattern to the adverse events by lot number. It almost appears that they are fine tuning the vaccines. Some lots have massive amounts of adverse events followed by periods of none. There's a cycle to it. Perhaps placebo followed by mRNA over and over again.
I'm still struggling with why, if intravenous injection is the main cause of vaccine adverse events, why is there a spike in myocarditis after the SECOND jab, much more than the first jab. Your thoughts?
I wonder about possible intravenous nitric oxide as a therapy for vaccine injured, or even precaution soon after injection? If endothelial destruction is the issue, could a steady supply of nitric oxide work to mitigate, impede, or even prevent reactions?
I can’t seem to find the answer anywhere about the difference between the MRNA vax and the viral vectors as far as AE’s and long term problems. I know moderna has the highest concentration but is there any correlation on AE’s and strength of the vax? Is it all just a crapshoot?
Excellent work!! I’m a year out from one dose and petrified. My batch says 1274 AE’s. I’m one year out from one dose. Had a complete blood work up and seeing my docs and checking every box. I’m still terrified.
Marc, another gorgeous piece. You have a very pleasant writing style. On the subject of spike being a baddie, I think maybe Ag:Ab complexes might be a significant factor in the clogging (spike impregnating E Cells) but my brain leaning way more toward LNPs being problematic. ~amazing work and that table with the diameters of vessels and the Arch - piece de resistance!
Say you are right, are you of the view that aspiration DOES actually (by detecting when the needle tip is in a vessel) prevent the injection entering the circulation?
Common sense would suggest to me that if the vessel was small enough, the pressure from aspirating would collapse the vessel walls and / or suck some of it onto the needle tip, so the injector might think they weren't in a vessel when they actually were.
Are you aware of any reduced acute serious AEs in countries where they routinely aspirate?
I think your proposed explanation is consistent with what Dr Bakhti (spelling?) predicted from the beginning.
Dr. John Campbell interviewed a health care worker (nurse?) on his YouTube channel recently who also experienced a metallic taste in her mouth immediately upon receiving a Covid vaccine, she also had other severe side effects.
There is another reason for side effects aside from the injection method. All vials are not created equal. Hacked emails showed far less quality control when mass produced then during clinical trials.
https://www.brightworkresearch.com/the-constant-covid-vaccine-manufacturing-quality-problems/
https://www.thesouthafrican.com/news/world-news/hacked-cache-shows-eu-drug-regulators-major-issues-with-pfizer-biontech-jab/
https://www.pogo.org/investigation/2021/03/avoiding-the-subject-on-pfizer-vaccine-quality-control-fda-says-less-than-european-counterpart/
Pfizer's contracts didn't allow any returns -- no mater the reason. Moderna didn't think of that (if they had more experience in being unscrupulous they would have made more money). So here we have Japan returning product: https://news.yahoo.com/japan-finds-stainless-steel-particles-135634842.html
If you look at VAERS you can see a pattern to the adverse events by lot number. It almost appears that they are fine tuning the vaccines. Some lots have massive amounts of adverse events followed by periods of none. There's a cycle to it. Perhaps placebo followed by mRNA over and over again.
Marc, brilliant as usual.
I'm still struggling with why, if intravenous injection is the main cause of vaccine adverse events, why is there a spike in myocarditis after the SECOND jab, much more than the first jab. Your thoughts?
If Pfizer really results in the death of 30 billion cells - that is a huge number.
A generally accepted measure of the total cells in our bodies is around 30 trillion.
Assuming a person is around 62 litres in volume that makes an average of 482 million cells per millilitre.
An upper arm is around 1 litre in volume = 483 billion cells.
If the vaccine was in any way able to stay put in the muscle, the death of 30 billion cells would result in 1/6th of the arm dying.
For AZ, if it really resulted in 100 billion cells dying - that would be over a fifth of your upper arm!
I wonder about possible intravenous nitric oxide as a therapy for vaccine injured, or even precaution soon after injection? If endothelial destruction is the issue, could a steady supply of nitric oxide work to mitigate, impede, or even prevent reactions?
I can’t seem to find the answer anywhere about the difference between the MRNA vax and the viral vectors as far as AE’s and long term problems. I know moderna has the highest concentration but is there any correlation on AE’s and strength of the vax? Is it all just a crapshoot?
Excellent work!! I’m a year out from one dose and petrified. My batch says 1274 AE’s. I’m one year out from one dose. Had a complete blood work up and seeing my docs and checking every box. I’m still terrified.
Excellent article; thanks for writing!
Well done, Marc. We all owe you a debt of gratitude for all your hard work.
Wow, brilliant writing Marc!😊 Very informative
Marc, another gorgeous piece. You have a very pleasant writing style. On the subject of spike being a baddie, I think maybe Ag:Ab complexes might be a significant factor in the clogging (spike impregnating E Cells) but my brain leaning way more toward LNPs being problematic. ~amazing work and that table with the diameters of vessels and the Arch - piece de resistance!
Marc,
Informative piece. It seems like we are only dealing with short term side effects.
What about the long term AE ‘s from each of the reactions you listed?
There is difficulty in predicting the future but could this be only the beginning of the side effects.
Say you are right, are you of the view that aspiration DOES actually (by detecting when the needle tip is in a vessel) prevent the injection entering the circulation?
Common sense would suggest to me that if the vessel was small enough, the pressure from aspirating would collapse the vessel walls and / or suck some of it onto the needle tip, so the injector might think they weren't in a vessel when they actually were.
Are you aware of any reduced acute serious AEs in countries where they routinely aspirate?
https://youtu.be/ANmkIIxCQCw
Have you seen this video which could explain the large clots the embalmers are seeing. Spike causes them on its own.