211 Comments

I think your proposed explanation is consistent with what Dr Bakhti (spelling?) predicted from the beginning.

Expand full comment

Dr. John Campbell interviewed a health care worker (nurse?) on his YouTube channel recently who also experienced a metallic taste in her mouth immediately upon receiving a Covid vaccine, she also had other severe side effects.

Expand full comment

There is another reason for side effects aside from the injection method. All vials are not created equal. Hacked emails showed far less quality control when mass produced then during clinical trials.

https://www.brightworkresearch.com/the-constant-covid-vaccine-manufacturing-quality-problems/

https://www.thesouthafrican.com/news/world-news/hacked-cache-shows-eu-drug-regulators-major-issues-with-pfizer-biontech-jab/

https://www.pogo.org/investigation/2021/03/avoiding-the-subject-on-pfizer-vaccine-quality-control-fda-says-less-than-european-counterpart/

Pfizer's contracts didn't allow any returns -- no mater the reason. Moderna didn't think of that (if they had more experience in being unscrupulous they would have made more money). So here we have Japan returning product: https://news.yahoo.com/japan-finds-stainless-steel-particles-135634842.html

Expand full comment

If you look at VAERS you can see a pattern to the adverse events by lot number. It almost appears that they are fine tuning the vaccines. Some lots have massive amounts of adverse events followed by periods of none. There's a cycle to it. Perhaps placebo followed by mRNA over and over again.

Expand full comment

Marc, brilliant as usual.

I'm still struggling with why, if intravenous injection is the main cause of vaccine adverse events, why is there a spike in myocarditis after the SECOND jab, much more than the first jab. Your thoughts?

Expand full comment

If Pfizer really results in the death of 30 billion cells - that is a huge number.

A generally accepted measure of the total cells in our bodies is around 30 trillion.

Assuming a person is around 62 litres in volume that makes an average of 482 million cells per millilitre.

An upper arm is around 1 litre in volume = 483 billion cells.

If the vaccine was in any way able to stay put in the muscle, the death of 30 billion cells would result in 1/6th of the arm dying.

For AZ, if it really resulted in 100 billion cells dying - that would be over a fifth of your upper arm!

Expand full comment

I wonder about possible intravenous nitric oxide as a therapy for vaccine injured, or even precaution soon after injection? If endothelial destruction is the issue, could a steady supply of nitric oxide work to mitigate, impede, or even prevent reactions?

Expand full comment

I can’t seem to find the answer anywhere about the difference between the MRNA vax and the viral vectors as far as AE’s and long term problems. I know moderna has the highest concentration but is there any correlation on AE’s and strength of the vax? Is it all just a crapshoot?

Expand full comment

Excellent work!! I’m a year out from one dose and petrified. My batch says 1274 AE’s. I’m one year out from one dose. Had a complete blood work up and seeing my docs and checking every box. I’m still terrified.

Expand full comment

Excellent article; thanks for writing!

Expand full comment
Mar 29, 2022Liked by Marc Girardot

Well done, Marc. We all owe you a debt of gratitude for all your hard work.

Expand full comment

Wow, brilliant writing Marc!😊 Very informative

Expand full comment

Marc, another gorgeous piece. You have a very pleasant writing style. On the subject of spike being a baddie, I think maybe Ag:Ab complexes might be a significant factor in the clogging (spike impregnating E Cells) but my brain leaning way more toward LNPs being problematic. ~amazing work and that table with the diameters of vessels and the Arch - piece de resistance!

Expand full comment

Marc,

Informative piece. It seems like we are only dealing with short term side effects.

What about the long term AE ‘s from each of the reactions you listed?

There is difficulty in predicting the future but could this be only the beginning of the side effects.

Expand full comment

Say you are right, are you of the view that aspiration DOES actually (by detecting when the needle tip is in a vessel) prevent the injection entering the circulation?

Common sense would suggest to me that if the vessel was small enough, the pressure from aspirating would collapse the vessel walls and / or suck some of it onto the needle tip, so the injector might think they weren't in a vessel when they actually were.

Are you aware of any reduced acute serious AEs in countries where they routinely aspirate?

Expand full comment

https://youtu.be/ANmkIIxCQCw

Have you seen this video which could explain the large clots the embalmers are seeing. Spike causes them on its own.

Expand full comment