Dr. John Campbell interviewed a health care worker (nurse?) on his YouTube channel recently who also experienced a metallic taste in her mouth immediately upon receiving a Covid vaccine, she also had other severe side effects.
Yes, the data is overwhelming. But it counters the narrative that the vaccine is to blame.
What people don't understand is that the vaccine is to blame in any case because the risk and damage of endothelial transfection in the billions is simply to high for an illness that the 99% of people deal with mundanely, at least pre-vaccination.
There is another reason for side effects aside from the injection method. All vials are not created equal. Hacked emails showed far less quality control when mass produced then during clinical trials.
It seems like there is a random mixture of a few dozen harmful ingredients (nanoparticles, parasites, toxins, and pathogens) in each batch, ensuring plausible deniability for the manufacturers who would be liable only if intent to harm was possible to prove...
Also, an unpaid researcher also noted that it looks like certain dormant ingredients in a batch can be activated later by another ingredient in a "booster" or even 5G.
If you look at VAERS you can see a pattern to the adverse events by lot number. It almost appears that they are fine tuning the vaccines. Some lots have massive amounts of adverse events followed by periods of none. There's a cycle to it. Perhaps placebo followed by mRNA over and over again.
My wife noticed in VAERS data in November, 2021 that about every 200th batch killed fast, irrespective of the manufacturer, suggesting cooperating among the companies as well as the intent to harm fast. After that, VAERS started doctoring the results...
Also, an unpaid researcher also noted that it looks like certain dormant ingredients in a batch can be activated later by another ingredient in a "booster" or even 5G.
That data is hard to deduce anything from because we don't know how large each "batch" is. It's very possible the batches with more VAERS reports are simply batches that contain a much larger number of doses than other batches. There is no reason to assume that the batches are all the same quantity.
I'm still struggling with why, if intravenous injection is the main cause of vaccine adverse events, why is there a spike in myocarditis after the SECOND jab, much more than the first jab. Your thoughts?
1) on is that it makes things much worse... There is an incremental effect, both in myocyte destruction, in clotting and calcification. Like throwing oil on fire.
2) many didn't get a chance to see the impact of the first jab as the 2nd came relatively fast. Often myocarditis came when exercising.
Still many died after dose 1...Likely of a heart attack. So it's both a perception effect and a reality.
If you are muscular say you have 1 in 10 probability, well that's 1 in 100 with 2 doses...
Accidents aren't unlikely. How many pple do u know personally whom you know got hit or suspect: in my circle, I have 3 for sure and 4 very likely, and I haven't been asking.
I volunteered during this past winter/early spring at a homeless shelter in rural Maryland, where the public health nurses came in once a week and gave the mRNA or AAV/DNA shots to any of the men who wanted them. Where I was sitting I watched how they administered the shots. None of the nurses aspirated. NONE! I don't think it ever entered their heads. Just bam! into the arm with no hesitation. I don't think aspiration is happening, much.
The IM shots into the mice, showed a clear difference versus IV.
Many people have nothing. If it were the spike, everybody would have a problem.
If it were bc immunocompromised react slower to stop spike production, those would have more AEs, and kid and young and healthy would not have AEs. That's not the case. 50% people die day 1 and 2, in 1 day a virus replicates 3-4 x, it's not enough to be overwhelmed by viruses.
We can't be religious about the spike, like Team Apocalypse is about the vax!
The vaccine is causing damage in the circulatory system. That's factual.
It's part of the MoA of the vaccine to transfect and for T-cells to attack...
Most of the concentrated transfection will occur in the first few minutes, possibly less. after that the damage would be uniformly spread throughout the body, and in part filtered by the liver.
Will bet on LNP-transfection-Tcell any time versus spike.
if it's the spike, it means other vaccine wouldn't do the same. *I am confident IV of the cell-penetrating vaccine kill accordingly if dosed wrong.
Or, 30 billion dead cells out of 30 trillion in total is 1 out of every 1000 cells. For a 60kg person, talking about 60 g of dead material. But that 60g not distributed evenly, ie hardly any in bone and so mostly in soft tissues, before even considering other concentrating factors as Marc has elucidated so nicely. (I think Clare meant 1/16th of the arm, still enough to notice :) )
It's in 2 doses... And their quality isn't necessarily always there. Also muscle cells are very long, and multiple transfection are bound to happen.
The point you are making is a very good one... If 50% transfects the circulatory system, that's the colossal damage we are inflicting on everybody for a vaccine that is ultimately useless.
Dr. Aditi Bhargava who is an mRNA researcher has stated that it is impossible to know how much mRNA is in each vaccine dose. This is because the lipid nanoparticles (LNP) automatically separate in to various sizes and each size of LNP is capable of carrying a different amount of mRNA. When the vaccine is diluted into doses there is no way to control what sizes of LNP go into each dose. One dose may have a higher number of large LNPs (and thus contain more mRNA) and another dose may contains a higher number of smaller LNPs, thus containing a smaller amount of mRNA. She has speculated that possibly this could also be contributing to some people experiencing issues.
And it's true there is a dosing problem with this technology.
Initially I thought also that was the problem.
But the spike isn't the problem, if it were everybody would have a problem, and specifically Recovered would be the ones with least problems as they cut short their production. Both are false.
Quasi all vaccines transfect, but not all shot seem dangerous.
If diluted, killibg one endothelial cell amongst 100 isn't a problem. Killing many in the same area will be like skinning alive the blood vessel... And initiate a variety of deleterious process depending on where it is: microvessel or artery, nerve or critical organ,...
In the muscle, the dilution will be limited so multiple transfections of one cell are bound to happen, when you get in the blood it becomes nearly impossible, based on concentration.
So in the blood the question is more, what amount is filtered by the liver. The transfected cells inside organs will occur also, but probabilistically, the endothelium should take 99%. As soon as PEG protection wears off, seems transfection is very high, so the longer it remains the more diluted it is the safest.
I wonder about possible intravenous nitric oxide as a therapy for vaccine injured, or even precaution soon after injection? If endothelial destruction is the issue, could a steady supply of nitric oxide work to mitigate, impede, or even prevent reactions?
I had the same idea. first it would need to be before, not after. But the order of magnitude wouldn't changed.
A very progressive injection over. Minute would dilute 70x the dose. That would be helpful... You'd still get a 15x concentration over normal, but not a 1000x
I can’t seem to find the answer anywhere about the difference between the MRNA vax and the viral vectors as far as AE’s and long term problems. I know moderna has the highest concentration but is there any correlation on AE’s and strength of the vax? Is it all just a crapshoot?
It's hard to tell bc it also depends on the PEG protection that stops clustering... This protection impedes transfection in the first few instants, so the longer it remains active the better.
Based on concentration levels, yes Moderna should have the worst outcome.
Excellent work!! I’m a year out from one dose and petrified. My batch says 1274 AE’s. I’m one year out from one dose. Had a complete blood work up and seeing my docs and checking every box. I’m still terrified.
The PEG delayed early transfection, and your nurse did a good job, and so you had a distributed transfection. Which was likely dealt well by your body. 👍🏻 Else you'd have had symptoms by now.
Thank you. I had J&J and there is no data on it? I had a very strong reaction to it immediately. I thought I was going to pass out. Never had that strong of a vaccine before so it scared me to death. Had to sit for 1/2 an hr to make sure I could drive. A year later and I’m still nervous 😩
I am exactly 1 year out from a single dose of J&J. I had flu-like symptoms and fever for 24 hours afterwards. And I also had mild headache, mild nausea and brief episodes of dizziness for a week afterwards. But once that all cleared up I haven’t had any issues since. I was concerned that it could possibly cause a flare of my autoimmune disease symptoms but thankfully that did not happen. I wish there was more data about how those with just 1 dose of J&J are fairing against SARS-Cov-2 infection and Covid-19.
Just found a newer article I had not seen. Was published in the NYT on March 15th.
“As Virus Data Mounts, the J.&J. Vaccine Holds Its Own: Once dismissed as less effective, the vaccine now seems to be preventing infections and illness about as well as the two mRNA options.”
Also from a January CBS news article: “The pharmaceutical company last year quietly shut down production at a plant in Leiden, Netherlands, which was the only facility where usable doses of the vaccine were manufactured, catching some of its customers off guard, including developing nations that prefer the single-dose J&J drug over two-dose alternatives, the report states.”
So the doom & gloom abt J&J’s effectiveness was BS, production was shut down and now Pfizer is getting all the $$$ 🤔
Thank you! I did see this. It was my belief early on that JNJ was getting a bad wrap in the press due to the initial low efficacy stats and then… the VITT issues (which is huge don’t get me wrong) but I had heard so many issues that were surfacing about MRNA and PFE but never a mention of them in the press until later. That spoke volumes to me. JNJ seemed to always be the fall guy.
I'm so sympathetic. Youngest son got two Pfizer shots courtesy US Army a year ago and I have been praying. So far, zero AEs. People like you and he are in my prayers every day, that the evil shots will do you no harm.
My second son took it for work, despite all my efforts... was also scared to death, especially when he called bc he was overworked and didn't feel well. A blood work checking for D-dimers got us all reassured, and started me thinking as to why we were luck and others weren't...
Marc, another gorgeous piece. You have a very pleasant writing style. On the subject of spike being a baddie, I think maybe Ag:Ab complexes might be a significant factor in the clogging (spike impregnating E Cells) but my brain leaning way more toward LNPs being problematic. ~amazing work and that table with the diameters of vessels and the Arch - piece de resistance!
When T-cells attack massively the lining of a blood vessel, biologically they simulate a cut...It's literally the same as a knife cutting through the vessel.
so the blood vessel needs to be clotted to avoid losing your blood. Simple as that.
When recovery is possible recovery will happen. The body is resilient. When damage is done and is stabilised, like calcification of nerves, permanent pain or impediment is likely.
If a domino effect occurs like endothelial wall destruction a cascade of effect could occur... Medium term.
This doesn't include LT auto-immunity tied to homologeous material between the spike and human DNA.
Say you are right, are you of the view that aspiration DOES actually (by detecting when the needle tip is in a vessel) prevent the injection entering the circulation?
Common sense would suggest to me that if the vessel was small enough, the pressure from aspirating would collapse the vessel walls and / or suck some of it onto the needle tip, so the injector might think they weren't in a vessel when they actually were.
Are you aware of any reduced acute serious AEs in countries where they routinely aspirate?
I think your proposed explanation is consistent with what Dr Bakhti (spelling?) predicted from the beginning.
Dr. John Campbell interviewed a health care worker (nurse?) on his YouTube channel recently who also experienced a metallic taste in her mouth immediately upon receiving a Covid vaccine, she also had other severe side effects.
Yes, the data is overwhelming. But it counters the narrative that the vaccine is to blame.
What people don't understand is that the vaccine is to blame in any case because the risk and damage of endothelial transfection in the billions is simply to high for an illness that the 99% of people deal with mundanely, at least pre-vaccination.
There is another reason for side effects aside from the injection method. All vials are not created equal. Hacked emails showed far less quality control when mass produced then during clinical trials.
https://www.brightworkresearch.com/the-constant-covid-vaccine-manufacturing-quality-problems/
https://www.thesouthafrican.com/news/world-news/hacked-cache-shows-eu-drug-regulators-major-issues-with-pfizer-biontech-jab/
https://www.pogo.org/investigation/2021/03/avoiding-the-subject-on-pfizer-vaccine-quality-control-fda-says-less-than-european-counterpart/
Pfizer's contracts didn't allow any returns -- no mater the reason. Moderna didn't think of that (if they had more experience in being unscrupulous they would have made more money). So here we have Japan returning product: https://news.yahoo.com/japan-finds-stainless-steel-particles-135634842.html
It seems like there is a random mixture of a few dozen harmful ingredients (nanoparticles, parasites, toxins, and pathogens) in each batch, ensuring plausible deniability for the manufacturers who would be liable only if intent to harm was possible to prove...
Also, an unpaid researcher also noted that it looks like certain dormant ingredients in a batch can be activated later by another ingredient in a "booster" or even 5G.
If you look at VAERS you can see a pattern to the adverse events by lot number. It almost appears that they are fine tuning the vaccines. Some lots have massive amounts of adverse events followed by periods of none. There's a cycle to it. Perhaps placebo followed by mRNA over and over again.
My wife noticed in VAERS data in November, 2021 that about every 200th batch killed fast, irrespective of the manufacturer, suggesting cooperating among the companies as well as the intent to harm fast. After that, VAERS started doctoring the results...
Also, an unpaid researcher also noted that it looks like certain dormant ingredients in a batch can be activated later by another ingredient in a "booster" or even 5G.
That data is hard to deduce anything from because we don't know how large each "batch" is. It's very possible the batches with more VAERS reports are simply batches that contain a much larger number of doses than other batches. There is no reason to assume that the batches are all the same quantity.
Marc, brilliant as usual.
I'm still struggling with why, if intravenous injection is the main cause of vaccine adverse events, why is there a spike in myocarditis after the SECOND jab, much more than the first jab. Your thoughts?
Thanks Ron.
There are several possibilities here.
1) on is that it makes things much worse... There is an incremental effect, both in myocyte destruction, in clotting and calcification. Like throwing oil on fire.
2) many didn't get a chance to see the impact of the first jab as the 2nd came relatively fast. Often myocarditis came when exercising.
Still many died after dose 1...Likely of a heart attack. So it's both a perception effect and a reality.
But are you not hypothesising that both jabs were intravenous here, which is surely unlikely?
I think people get IV more often than said.
If you are muscular say you have 1 in 10 probability, well that's 1 in 100 with 2 doses...
Accidents aren't unlikely. How many pple do u know personally whom you know got hit or suspect: in my circle, I have 3 for sure and 4 very likely, and I haven't been asking.
I'd guess its easy to IV little children and youngsters due to arm size. I always wonder about the connection with that and autism.
I am very convinced of the link with autism (read my article on the brain), SIDS, and Alzheimer disease.
Have you seen the research on Vit K which is being given IV at birth (s/b subcutaneously if at all).
I have asked around the clinics doing aspiration in my area, and they all say 1 in thousands, if at all.
Yes, I know everybody is saying that. Except that makes absolutely no sense from a physiology standpoint.
Every cell in the body is in proximity to a blood vessel, maximum one cell away.
The more central to the muscle, the larger the arteries and veins.
With a millileter needle you can inject into fairly small vessel.
2 possibilities:
1- we humans aren't good at counting, and forget irrelevant info.
2- the aspiration technique doesn't work well when in small vessels, the walls collapse as was suggested by Jonathan Engler.
3- Professional nurses know what they are doing and it's bc we've been using poorly trained vaccinators...
Probably all 3. IV injection is the cause for this mess.
Even when aspirating Denmark still had 40% myocarditis of Norway, so it's not enough.
I volunteered during this past winter/early spring at a homeless shelter in rural Maryland, where the public health nurses came in once a week and gave the mRNA or AAV/DNA shots to any of the men who wanted them. Where I was sitting I watched how they administered the shots. None of the nurses aspirated. NONE! I don't think it ever entered their heads. Just bam! into the arm with no hesitation. I don't think aspiration is happening, much.
Plausible, but not really convincing. I think there's something else happening as well.
The IM shots into the mice, showed a clear difference versus IV.
Many people have nothing. If it were the spike, everybody would have a problem.
If it were bc immunocompromised react slower to stop spike production, those would have more AEs, and kid and young and healthy would not have AEs. That's not the case. 50% people die day 1 and 2, in 1 day a virus replicates 3-4 x, it's not enough to be overwhelmed by viruses.
We can't be religious about the spike, like Team Apocalypse is about the vax!
The vaccine is causing damage in the circulatory system. That's factual.
It's part of the MoA of the vaccine to transfect and for T-cells to attack...
Most of the concentrated transfection will occur in the first few minutes, possibly less. after that the damage would be uniformly spread throughout the body, and in part filtered by the liver.
Will bet on LNP-transfection-Tcell any time versus spike.
if it's the spike, it means other vaccine wouldn't do the same. *I am confident IV of the cell-penetrating vaccine kill accordingly if dosed wrong.
Your comment here seems to be addressing spike. I wasn't disputing your views on spike toxicity. Did this stray in from another thread?
If Pfizer really results in the death of 30 billion cells - that is a huge number.
A generally accepted measure of the total cells in our bodies is around 30 trillion.
Assuming a person is around 62 litres in volume that makes an average of 482 million cells per millilitre.
An upper arm is around 1 litre in volume = 483 billion cells.
If the vaccine was in any way able to stay put in the muscle, the death of 30 billion cells would result in 1/6th of the arm dying.
For AZ, if it really resulted in 100 billion cells dying - that would be over a fifth of your upper arm!
Or, 30 billion dead cells out of 30 trillion in total is 1 out of every 1000 cells. For a 60kg person, talking about 60 g of dead material. But that 60g not distributed evenly, ie hardly any in bone and so mostly in soft tissues, before even considering other concentrating factors as Marc has elucidated so nicely. (I think Clare meant 1/16th of the arm, still enough to notice :) )
It's in 2 doses... And their quality isn't necessarily always there. Also muscle cells are very long, and multiple transfection are bound to happen.
The point you are making is a very good one... If 50% transfects the circulatory system, that's the colossal damage we are inflicting on everybody for a vaccine that is ultimately useless.
Dr. Aditi Bhargava who is an mRNA researcher has stated that it is impossible to know how much mRNA is in each vaccine dose. This is because the lipid nanoparticles (LNP) automatically separate in to various sizes and each size of LNP is capable of carrying a different amount of mRNA. When the vaccine is diluted into doses there is no way to control what sizes of LNP go into each dose. One dose may have a higher number of large LNPs (and thus contain more mRNA) and another dose may contains a higher number of smaller LNPs, thus containing a smaller amount of mRNA. She has speculated that possibly this could also be contributing to some people experiencing issues.
Probably no mRNA is in any of the injections:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/mrna?utm_source=%2Fprofile%2F42034032-ray-horvath-the-source-&utm_medium=reader2
Excellent comment.
And it's true there is a dosing problem with this technology.
Initially I thought also that was the problem.
But the spike isn't the problem, if it were everybody would have a problem, and specifically Recovered would be the ones with least problems as they cut short their production. Both are false.
Quasi all vaccines transfect, but not all shot seem dangerous.
If diluted, killibg one endothelial cell amongst 100 isn't a problem. Killing many in the same area will be like skinning alive the blood vessel... And initiate a variety of deleterious process depending on where it is: microvessel or artery, nerve or critical organ,...
So not even the differences in the amount of LNP injected (rather than the amount of mRNA) would make a difference?
Thanks Marc. Is the number of LNPs estimated to enter each cell as hypothetical as all the other assumptions about what would happen after injection?
Yes and no.
In the muscle, the dilution will be limited so multiple transfections of one cell are bound to happen, when you get in the blood it becomes nearly impossible, based on concentration.
So in the blood the question is more, what amount is filtered by the liver. The transfected cells inside organs will occur also, but probabilistically, the endothelium should take 99%. As soon as PEG protection wears off, seems transfection is very high, so the longer it remains the more diluted it is the safest.
Thanks.
I wonder about possible intravenous nitric oxide as a therapy for vaccine injured, or even precaution soon after injection? If endothelial destruction is the issue, could a steady supply of nitric oxide work to mitigate, impede, or even prevent reactions?
I doubt that it would change the math.
I had the same idea. first it would need to be before, not after. But the order of magnitude wouldn't changed.
A very progressive injection over. Minute would dilute 70x the dose. That would be helpful... You'd still get a 15x concentration over normal, but not a 1000x
I can’t seem to find the answer anywhere about the difference between the MRNA vax and the viral vectors as far as AE’s and long term problems. I know moderna has the highest concentration but is there any correlation on AE’s and strength of the vax? Is it all just a crapshoot?
It's hard to tell bc it also depends on the PEG protection that stops clustering... This protection impedes transfection in the first few instants, so the longer it remains active the better.
Based on concentration levels, yes Moderna should have the worst outcome.
Excellent work!! I’m a year out from one dose and petrified. My batch says 1274 AE’s. I’m one year out from one dose. Had a complete blood work up and seeing my docs and checking every box. I’m still terrified.
Thank you Brenda.
This should be reassuring to you.
The PEG delayed early transfection, and your nurse did a good job, and so you had a distributed transfection. Which was likely dealt well by your body. 👍🏻 Else you'd have had symptoms by now.
No need to be terrified.
Thank you. I had J&J and there is no data on it? I had a very strong reaction to it immediately. I thought I was going to pass out. Never had that strong of a vaccine before so it scared me to death. Had to sit for 1/2 an hr to make sure I could drive. A year later and I’m still nervous 😩
I am exactly 1 year out from a single dose of J&J. I had flu-like symptoms and fever for 24 hours afterwards. And I also had mild headache, mild nausea and brief episodes of dizziness for a week afterwards. But once that all cleared up I haven’t had any issues since. I was concerned that it could possibly cause a flare of my autoimmune disease symptoms but thankfully that did not happen. I wish there was more data about how those with just 1 dose of J&J are fairing against SARS-Cov-2 infection and Covid-19.
Zero data on JNJ. 😩
Just found a newer article I had not seen. Was published in the NYT on March 15th.
“As Virus Data Mounts, the J.&J. Vaccine Holds Its Own: Once dismissed as less effective, the vaccine now seems to be preventing infections and illness about as well as the two mRNA options.”
Archived here: https://web.archive.org/web/20220320004307/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/15/health/covid-johnson-vaccine.html
Also from a January CBS news article: “The pharmaceutical company last year quietly shut down production at a plant in Leiden, Netherlands, which was the only facility where usable doses of the vaccine were manufactured, catching some of its customers off guard, including developing nations that prefer the single-dose J&J drug over two-dose alternatives, the report states.”
So the doom & gloom abt J&J’s effectiveness was BS, production was shut down and now Pfizer is getting all the $$$ 🤔
Thank you! I did see this. It was my belief early on that JNJ was getting a bad wrap in the press due to the initial low efficacy stats and then… the VITT issues (which is huge don’t get me wrong) but I had heard so many issues that were surfacing about MRNA and PFE but never a mention of them in the press until later. That spoke volumes to me. JNJ seemed to always be the fall guy.
I'm so sympathetic. Youngest son got two Pfizer shots courtesy US Army a year ago and I have been praying. So far, zero AEs. People like you and he are in my prayers every day, that the evil shots will do you no harm.
My second son took it for work, despite all my efforts... was also scared to death, especially when he called bc he was overworked and didn't feel well. A blood work checking for D-dimers got us all reassured, and started me thinking as to why we were luck and others weren't...
Excellent article; thanks for writing!
Well done, Marc. We all owe you a debt of gratitude for all your hard work.
Wow, brilliant writing Marc!😊 Very informative
Marc, another gorgeous piece. You have a very pleasant writing style. On the subject of spike being a baddie, I think maybe Ag:Ab complexes might be a significant factor in the clogging (spike impregnating E Cells) but my brain leaning way more toward LNPs being problematic. ~amazing work and that table with the diameters of vessels and the Arch - piece de resistance!
Jessica,
The coagulation is much simpler than that.
Had another Aha moment :-)
When T-cells attack massively the lining of a blood vessel, biologically they simulate a cut...It's literally the same as a knife cutting through the vessel.
so the blood vessel needs to be clotted to avoid losing your blood. Simple as that.
So simple.
Marc,
Informative piece. It seems like we are only dealing with short term side effects.
What about the long term AE ‘s from each of the reactions you listed?
There is difficulty in predicting the future but could this be only the beginning of the side effects.
Hi Gina,
When recovery is possible recovery will happen. The body is resilient. When damage is done and is stabilised, like calcification of nerves, permanent pain or impediment is likely.
If a domino effect occurs like endothelial wall destruction a cascade of effect could occur... Medium term.
This doesn't include LT auto-immunity tied to homologeous material between the spike and human DNA.
Say you are right, are you of the view that aspiration DOES actually (by detecting when the needle tip is in a vessel) prevent the injection entering the circulation?
Common sense would suggest to me that if the vessel was small enough, the pressure from aspirating would collapse the vessel walls and / or suck some of it onto the needle tip, so the injector might think they weren't in a vessel when they actually were.
Are you aware of any reduced acute serious AEs in countries where they routinely aspirate?
Interesting perspective Jonathan.
Denmark seems to have reduced 60% myocarditis versus neighbor Norway... But 40% remains. May be it's the phenomenon you describe
https://youtu.be/ANmkIIxCQCw
Have you seen this video which could explain the large clots the embalmers are seeing. Spike causes them on its own.
In my honest opinion, there is no proof as of now that the spike is the cause of what happens as described by embalmers.