Last month in Australia, heavy rains forced operators of dams reaching capacity to release immense quantities of water downstream flash-flooding entire regions and threatening the lives of thousands.

It’s compelling to note the vivid contrast:

on the one side, a controlled progressive flow of water would have been invisible and harmless to a passerby, a charming chanting stream;
on the other side, a few hours later, the same amount of water uncontrolled descending brutally on a population and their houses becomes monstrous, life-changing and devastating.

The analogy with vaccines is more striking than one thinks: for many, these vaccines have proven to be safe, and to some - too many - they have proven harmful.

And I believe, it’s also a question of flow…

Today I demonstrate that:

Scuttling billions of cells repeatedly - outside the muscle -cannot be innocuous, and is likely the principal root cause of all the vaccine adverse effects witnessed.

This realisation means that current vaccine technologies, as well as mass vaccination techniques and processes, need to be audited and revisited rapidly, to account for these findings.

I want to thank whole-heartedly all the kind subscribers who have contributed generously and voluntarily.

Being recently unemployed, your voluntary help is welcome and deeply appreciated.

Apologies to all, this article is a bit technical at times and long , but it is an indispensable step to pinpoint the circumstances by which these vaccines can be dangerous.

Note: For the purpose of simplification, I will be using the term nanoparticle for any vaccine vector vehicle capable of penetrating a cell and delivering inside a foreign genetic load that includes mRNA/DNA vaccines, attenuated viruses and viral vectors.

For over a year now, I have been highlighting a fact that most “experts” have seriously been overlooking for the past decades:

All cells penetrated by nanoparticles, mRNA or viral vector, will necessarily be destroyed by the immune system

As you can see below in the description of the mechanism of action of an anti-COVID mRNA vaccine, the transfected1 muscle cell is supposed to die. That’s what apoptosis means. The destruction of all transfected cells is part of the process by which the immune system is stimulated, and it happens quite rapidly.

credit: T.Karginov

For the record, one has to remember that these technologies were adapted from anti-cancer technologies with the very purpose of stimulating T-cells and destroying tumour cells. So, it should not come as a surprise.

Vaccine designers re-purposed these platforms to trigger transfected cell destruction to liberate spike proteins into the tissue so that they can be processed by immune cells and stimulate the production of antibodies.

In layman’s terms, pre-booster vaccination meant every future Vaccinated agreed to have up to :

30 billion cells scuttled for a Pfizer-only combo
80 billion cells destroyed with 2 shots of Moderna, and
100 billions cells wasted by 2 shots of AstraZeneca!

To be honest, in principle, that should not have been a problem because these cells were supposed to be muscle cells which can regenerate.

On paper, the vaccines should have been relatively innocuous.

Can nanoparticles end up in the blood stream?

I have already addressed extensively in previous articles on the leak from the muscle, and on the risk of intravenous injections.

If nanoparticles escape the muscle - which is clearly proven from the Pfizer data - the circulatory system inevitably becomes their receptacles, and LNPs will start doing what they were designed to do: transfect, penetrate endothelial cells in very large numbers.

It is noteworthy to highlight that what is true for mRNA and DNA vaccines, is likely also true for viral vectors and attenuated viruses vaccines.

German pathologist, Professor Arne Burkhardt, recently told us that up to 5% of direct intravenous injection can occur. Though that seems a frighteningly high number, physiologically that’s certainly a possible proportion.

Injection Needle Tip vs Blood Vessel Size

Credit: Prof. Dr. Medical Arne Burkhardt

The above picture extracted from Pr. Burkhardt’s latest report demonstrates the physical possibility of a partial or total injection into a blood vessel.

Depending on local training, local protocols and the quality of the medical personnel in charge of vaccinating this necessarily would vary widely.

Literally Russian Roulette !

Why are some injections less dangerous than others?

Let’s do the math!
10 billion nanoparticles spread over 100,000 km of blood vessels,
that’s theoretically destroying 1 endothelial cell every centimeter.
Indeed, that shouldn’t be cause for alarm2.

And that’s likely what happens with many vaccinated folks who have had no issue: The nanoparticles are distributed enough that transfection zones are scattered throughout the endothelial surfaces of the body and the micro-environment balance - the homeostasis - is not disrupted significantly to start a domino effect. A neighbouring cell to the one sacrificed on the altar of immunisation rapidly divides and substitutes back in place a new cell.

If the hits on endothelial cells are highly concentrated, the endothelial wall will be devastated, smooth muscle cells exposed and damaged, and the whole balance of the blood vessel tipped towards clotting, crystallisation and necrosis. Not good.

All adverse effects seem tightly correlated to this deleterious process, either as a micro or a macro event…

In other words, to be innocuous, cell-penetrating nanoparticles need to be diluted so that the probability of concentrated hits is inexistent.

To come back to the “Dam and Water Analogy” , if the water flow is controlled, the shock is absorbed in time and in space, and balance can be maintained. If not, the flow will cause chaos and death in unfathomable ways.

Outside the muscle, where have vaccine nanoparticles the highest probability of penetrating and harming?

The Blood Vessel Diameter Factor

Here the data is extremely clear.

Covid Myth Buster Series

Vaccine Russian Roulette : Why some might be…

Comments on this post are for paid subscribers