Studies showed inadvertent intravascular injections occur regularly when injecting in the muscle. Further studies confirmed COVID vaccines in IV cause the same adverse effects...let's wake up
As a former nurse, I was taught to always aspirate first to check for blood backflash in giving shots. They were also training non-medical personnel to give these jabs. I know because my daughter’s friend was trained and she was only working as a pharmacy assistant, no medical training what-so-ever! Makes me wonder what kind of information she gave to get the informed consent. I bet it wasn’t much!!
Only a very slow injection would reduce the damage, so protocol needs to be "Aspiration" + "very slow injection". The fate of world health and of billions of families are in the hands of these injectors.
Hi, wonder if anybody paid attention to this autopsy finding in Germany.
Of note, it has been recently reported that intravenous injection of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine is able to induce an acute (epi-) myocarditis in a preclinical model [28]. Interestingly, we recorded inflammatory foci predominantly in the right heart, which may suggest a gradual blood-stream derived dilution effect and based on this finding it is at least tempting to speculate that inadvertent intravascular vaccine injection may be contributive
The article "Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis" by Yonker et al shows that CD4+ expresse PD-1, a sign of senescence (ie they have worked more by apoptosising more transfected cells). That is again a sign of a Bolus injection that can explain a much higher transfection
You have been and are 100% right Marc.. and this paper NAILS it. NAILS it dead on. Published today, Jan. 4 The signal is 100% unambiguous. Those with myocarditis had free floating, full spike protein in their blood. Those vax'ed but without myocarditis had NONE.
Extensive antibody profiling and T-cell responses in the individuals who developed postvaccine myocarditis were essentially indistinguishable from those of vaccinated control subjects, despite a modest increase in cytokine production. A notable finding was that markedly elevated levels of full-length spike protein (33.9±22.4 pg/mL), unbound by antibodies, were detected in the plasma of individuals with postvaccine myocarditis, whereas no free spike was detected in asymptomatic vaccinated control subjects (unpaired t test; P<0.0001).
Thanks for the kind comment and taking the time to read me.
As I explained above, the Yonker paper is putting forward the spike as a root cause - which i disagree with. The paper is manipulative in that it doesn't show the level of spike for the Control group in the first few days. Samples are at a median of D+14. The data from Ogata (https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/its-not-the-spike-causing-adverse) showed that non-myocarditis also have that same level of spike, average 63pg/mL, peaking at 150pg/mL.
What is more interesting in that article is the expression of PD-1 (senescence) on CD4+s. That means they have had to kill more transfected cells...which consistent with the bolus theory again.
Thank you for the reply Marc. Indeed, I did not mean to emphasize the point of spike as pathogen, although I tend to disagree with you on that point. Even if spike is not pathogenic in the way that commentators like Walter Chesnut believe, it is still the epitope our immune systems are responding to as IgG3 depletes to zero and IgG4 rises post booster, and hence it plays a villainous role.
I did mean to emphasize the fact that free floating spike means the injections did in fact bio-distribute out of the shoulder muscle, and those who were harmed the most had this signal. You have repeatedly brought attention to the unreliability of IM injections and I am very thankful for this insight.
You are perfectly correct on the spike as an epitope targetted by the immune system in transfected cells.
The IgG3 and 4. I haven't looked into enough. All I can say is it's obvious that little spike is produced after jab 2, as T-cells apoptosise very rapidly transfected cells. And so it's only logical that the immune would react accordingly.
The Acuitas data from Pfizer showed progressive leakage in the vascular system.
With low concentration leakage limited damage occurs.
With a 3000x concentration à bolus is much more dangerous.
Byram Bridle used FOIA to get the Pfizer Japanese study that showed the distribution of mRNA particles throughout the body (in mice). This was exceptional to the assumption that the product would stay at the injection site in the muscle.
Don't *all* vaccines seep into the bloodstream ? (Sometimes in a bolus - thank you!)
With the normal flow of blood through capillaries proximal to every cell, wouldn't a (correct) intramuscular injection *always* seep into the bloodstream, albeit perhaps "slowly" - such as minutes ?
It seems like everyone is discussing this binary of intra-vascular or intra-muscular but is the reality that those are the two ends of a spectrum of dosage vs. time ? (highly skewed to intra-muscular we hope)
Mark, I just heard you first time on the recent Kirsch "debate" with student Karan and new to your blog. Thank you for your bringing the face of reality to that event. Question: as a doctor, is there enough hard data and anecdotal evidence that we can confidently say that the entire cov-vxx agenda is an intentional weapon of depopulation? (As opposed to a sloppy mistake being covered up in order to save face and to further the medical-industrial-complex).
No, I found no evidence of a de population agenda. I found indication of the Bill Gates hubris, of the Fauci obscene smokescreens, and political manipulations to push vaccines and the slaughter...
This is a combination of things, including politicization of healthcare, medical hubris (we know better when they don't), a century of delusion or manipulation around vaccines, etc...
Marc, another underscore on the previous. There must be some accountability for the millions maimed or killed by this genetic device that was willfully launched on humanity with almost no option of refusal. All the earmarks point to intentionality and preplanning. And not to mention the pushing to the side of usable and successful drugs that worked instead of the genetic experiment option. There must be some place for accountability.
Marc, lets say this thesis is substantially correct. Assuming trials come (or truth commissions), who are they going to convict and hold personally responsible with a verdict like that? With this assessment, the only entity that can be held responsible is 'science' itself. That seems like an unacceptable outcome. Can the Judge and Jury decide that as a result of this all global bio and genetic experimentations are to be stopped? And that BSL4 labs are to be dismantled? That all funding is to cut for this kind of experimental vaccine work.
On the vaccine side both the FDA and the CDC have had criminal behaviours. The question is : is it bc they were given orders by the government or are some corrupt?
I just saw this report about a New York high school teacher who was arrested for injecting a teen with a COVID-19 vaccine without his parents’ consent and got away with only having to do community service. The teacher did it in her own home!
I immediately thought of the risk of inadvertent intravascular injections. I bet the prosecution didn't think (or want) to argue that. I can image a civil suit in which your work is very helpful.
The intro implies that, if a single injection has a 5% chance of harm, then the total probability of harm after five injections is 25%. But this is flawed probability. After all, twenty injections clearly cannot mean a 100% chance of harm. Someone with better math than mine will need to provide the correct calculation.
As a math person whose fav subject was probability and statistics I appreciated the correct calculation instead of the 25% many would expect. The logic is simple actually. 95 out of 100 escape the first time. Of those 95, 95% escape the second jab. Of those 90.25, 95% will dodge again on the third jab. IOW, .95 to the 5th power is the probability of being free as a bird after 5 tries. 77.4, that is. Meaning 22.6 out of 100 will have gotten screwed. Simple, but not immediately intuitive if you've never had to know how it works.
My daughter almost certainly received her injection into her vascular system. She had more bleeding than I have seen on any injection or blood draw; coming home with a blood soaked cotton ball and then experiencing subsequent bruising of a large area on her upper arm. Within the next couple of weeks her FitBit notified her several times of elevated heart rate, some of which she sensed and was aware of having. She went to an urgent care center that sent her on to the ER. The ER docs did not find anything signigicant but recommended that she follow up with a cardiologist if she had ongoing issues. She has not done that nor has she had subsequent notifications of any abnormal heart rate.
I pray that this was a short term effect for her. She only received the one J&J shot and has not boosted. There also seems to be a lack of discussion over the long term effects if any of the DNA based shots versus the mRNA,
Both can be harmful. The J&J has 50 bn once. Pfizer has 10bn twice. Clearly on a per dose basis Pfizer would be better than J&J, but with 2 doses, it becomes hard to tell.
Me too! Breaking out of the endless vaccine propaganda. I would never have questioned so much if the whole COVID vaccine effort had not appeared so nefarious from the start. In some way I guess I’m thankful for the rude awakening.
Me too! I once participated in vaccine studies. After these last few years though I have gone back over my history with a suspicion that the HepB vaccine and study likely was a trigger for my autoimmune issues.
I wish I could get my friends and family to turn off the TV and read what you and others are working so hard to get out there.
I now inhabit a strange realm where I try to be ready to let go of loved ones who have by default opted to be experimented upon rather than to rely on their mucosal immunity and T-cells to perform a function they've been refining for hundreds of millions of years.
Marc, it may interest you to take a look at the one and only clinical trial in the US for a SARS-CoV vaccine back in 2004. This study was funded and conducted by NIAID.
"Each DNA vaccination will be 1 mL of vaccine administered intramuscularly (in deltoid muscle) using the Biojector 2000 Needle-Free Injection Management System."
I saw an urgent care doctor who said to me: "Don't get the vaccine. I'm trying to get the word out, and it makes me sick that they're pushing it on kids." I almost want to cry when I think of that.
Where, if I may ask?? (Approximately... I'm just curious.) I live on Cape Cod, in the northeastern US, and I no longer know where to turn for medical care. My state (Massachusetts) is Pharma Central, and the Covidian Force is very strong here. I've given up on the local clinic I've gone to for almost forty years. I'm wondering how to find a doctor or physician's assistant who has not drunk the Kool-Aid.
The problem is that I won't wear a mask, so I can't even get in the door without making a scene.
I never wore a mask. Several times in 2020 I wore underwear on my head to go grocery shopping, but it still felt like a cop-out and after a while I stopped even doing that.
Eastern Long Island, so that won't help you very much. He was the only doctor that I met who voiced that opinion. My PCP pressured me to get it--spoke to me like a child - I told him off. My gynecologist pressured me also.
The day is coming when insurance CEOs listen to their actuaries, realize the vaccinated are in a higher financial risk category, and raise their premiums.
I thought for sure insurance companies, with a fiduciary responsibility to investors, would be the first to push against Pharma & the rising claims. Color me surprised, I guess woke does make it into the boardroom.
Dec 19, 2022·edited Dec 19, 2022Liked by Marc Girardot
I heard rules for 401k management has recently been reworded to remove the fiduciary component in order to allow ESG by 401k companies. changes may also happen to life insurers along with government $ to life insurers to keep quiet like gov $ encentivized hospitals to call every diagnosis corid 19.
who would have thought my scientific red flags waking me up at night a few meters away from the Eiffel Tower would end up with taxes, minting dollars and taxes? :-)
Love all these comments. Always filled with common sense and reality.
That was hard to read. The cruelty to the animals! A scientist that can perform such experiments over and over has something wrong upstairs. It’s just sick!
We are so constituted that we can never receive other proteins into the blood than those that have been modified by digestive juices. Every time alien protein penetrates by effraction, the organism suffers and becomes resistant.
As a former nurse, I was taught to always aspirate first to check for blood backflash in giving shots. They were also training non-medical personnel to give these jabs. I know because my daughter’s friend was trained and she was only working as a pharmacy assistant, no medical training what-so-ever! Makes me wonder what kind of information she gave to get the informed consent. I bet it wasn’t much!!
You know Aspiration probably reduces some, but not all IV injection as proven by the steroid studies:
https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-14-0891
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136051
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/another-one-bites-the-dust
Only a very slow injection would reduce the damage, so protocol needs to be "Aspiration" + "very slow injection". The fate of world health and of billions of families are in the hands of these injectors.
Hi, wonder if anybody paid attention to this autopsy finding in Germany.
Of note, it has been recently reported that intravenous injection of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine is able to induce an acute (epi-) myocarditis in a preclinical model [28]. Interestingly, we recorded inflammatory foci predominantly in the right heart, which may suggest a gradual blood-stream derived dilution effect and based on this finding it is at least tempting to speculate that inadvertent intravascular vaccine injection may be contributive
Data from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5
Rgds JR
Yes, I saw this comment. Thanks
It's all consistent with the Bolus Theory.
The article "Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis" by Yonker et al shows that CD4+ expresse PD-1, a sign of senescence (ie they have worked more by apoptosising more transfected cells). That is again a sign of a Bolus injection that can explain a much higher transfection
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epdf/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061025
You wilm find this article illuminating.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8436386/
Thank you for this. This article is quoted above :-), and I have been quoting it repeatedly.
Yes, it is a very very important piece of research.
I have been quoting this article since September 2021. (think the pre-print came out in August).
Thanks for your contribution. I can't read everything , so it's always helpful.
Happy New Year, Juan.
You have been and are 100% right Marc.. and this paper NAILS it. NAILS it dead on. Published today, Jan. 4 The signal is 100% unambiguous. Those with myocarditis had free floating, full spike protein in their blood. Those vax'ed but without myocarditis had NONE.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061025
RESULTS:
Extensive antibody profiling and T-cell responses in the individuals who developed postvaccine myocarditis were essentially indistinguishable from those of vaccinated control subjects, despite a modest increase in cytokine production. A notable finding was that markedly elevated levels of full-length spike protein (33.9±22.4 pg/mL), unbound by antibodies, were detected in the plasma of individuals with postvaccine myocarditis, whereas no free spike was detected in asymptomatic vaccinated control subjects (unpaired t test; P<0.0001).
Thanks for the kind comment and taking the time to read me.
As I explained above, the Yonker paper is putting forward the spike as a root cause - which i disagree with. The paper is manipulative in that it doesn't show the level of spike for the Control group in the first few days. Samples are at a median of D+14. The data from Ogata (https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/its-not-the-spike-causing-adverse) showed that non-myocarditis also have that same level of spike, average 63pg/mL, peaking at 150pg/mL.
What is more interesting in that article is the expression of PD-1 (senescence) on CD4+s. That means they have had to kill more transfected cells...which consistent with the bolus theory again.
Thanks for your contribution.
Happy New year.
Thank you for the reply Marc. Indeed, I did not mean to emphasize the point of spike as pathogen, although I tend to disagree with you on that point. Even if spike is not pathogenic in the way that commentators like Walter Chesnut believe, it is still the epitope our immune systems are responding to as IgG3 depletes to zero and IgG4 rises post booster, and hence it plays a villainous role.
I did mean to emphasize the fact that free floating spike means the injections did in fact bio-distribute out of the shoulder muscle, and those who were harmed the most had this signal. You have repeatedly brought attention to the unreliability of IM injections and I am very thankful for this insight.
You are perfectly correct on the spike as an epitope targetted by the immune system in transfected cells.
The IgG3 and 4. I haven't looked into enough. All I can say is it's obvious that little spike is produced after jab 2, as T-cells apoptosise very rapidly transfected cells. And so it's only logical that the immune would react accordingly.
The Acuitas data from Pfizer showed progressive leakage in the vascular system.
With low concentration leakage limited damage occurs.
With a 3000x concentration à bolus is much more dangerous.
Byram Bridle used FOIA to get the Pfizer Japanese study that showed the distribution of mRNA particles throughout the body (in mice). This was exceptional to the assumption that the product would stay at the injection site in the muscle.
Don't *all* vaccines seep into the bloodstream ? (Sometimes in a bolus - thank you!)
With the normal flow of blood through capillaries proximal to every cell, wouldn't a (correct) intramuscular injection *always* seep into the bloodstream, albeit perhaps "slowly" - such as minutes ?
It seems like everyone is discussing this binary of intra-vascular or intra-muscular but is the reality that those are the two ends of a spectrum of dosage vs. time ? (highly skewed to intra-muscular we hope)
So what is the mRna shot doing to us? Never mind the method of how it was given.
Go my sept 11article
Mark, I just heard you first time on the recent Kirsch "debate" with student Karan and new to your blog. Thank you for your bringing the face of reality to that event. Question: as a doctor, is there enough hard data and anecdotal evidence that we can confidently say that the entire cov-vxx agenda is an intentional weapon of depopulation? (As opposed to a sloppy mistake being covered up in order to save face and to further the medical-industrial-complex).
Am not a Doctor for one.
No, I found no evidence of a de population agenda. I found indication of the Bill Gates hubris, of the Fauci obscene smokescreens, and political manipulations to push vaccines and the slaughter...
This is a combination of things, including politicization of healthcare, medical hubris (we know better when they don't), a century of delusion or manipulation around vaccines, etc...
Marc, another underscore on the previous. There must be some accountability for the millions maimed or killed by this genetic device that was willfully launched on humanity with almost no option of refusal. All the earmarks point to intentionality and preplanning. And not to mention the pushing to the side of usable and successful drugs that worked instead of the genetic experiment option. There must be some place for accountability.
The discounting of early treatment is indeed equivalent to murder.
Marc, lets say this thesis is substantially correct. Assuming trials come (or truth commissions), who are they going to convict and hold personally responsible with a verdict like that? With this assessment, the only entity that can be held responsible is 'science' itself. That seems like an unacceptable outcome. Can the Judge and Jury decide that as a result of this all global bio and genetic experimentations are to be stopped? And that BSL4 labs are to be dismantled? That all funding is to cut for this kind of experimental vaccine work.
There's a diverse set of responsibilities.
On the vaccine side both the FDA and the CDC have had criminal behaviours. The question is : is it bc they were given orders by the government or are some corrupt?
I am pretty certain there's enough there.
I just saw this report about a New York high school teacher who was arrested for injecting a teen with a COVID-19 vaccine without his parents’ consent and got away with only having to do community service. The teacher did it in her own home!
I immediately thought of the risk of inadvertent intravascular injections. I bet the prosecution didn't think (or want) to argue that. I can image a civil suit in which your work is very helpful.
https://dailycaller.com/2022/12/19/ny-teacher-laura-russo-community-service-injecting-teen-covid-vaccine/
People have lost their mind...
The intro implies that, if a single injection has a 5% chance of harm, then the total probability of harm after five injections is 25%. But this is flawed probability. After all, twenty injections clearly cannot mean a 100% chance of harm. Someone with better math than mine will need to provide the correct calculation.
As a math person whose fav subject was probability and statistics I appreciated the correct calculation instead of the 25% many would expect. The logic is simple actually. 95 out of 100 escape the first time. Of those 95, 95% escape the second jab. Of those 90.25, 95% will dodge again on the third jab. IOW, .95 to the 5th power is the probability of being free as a bird after 5 tries. 77.4, that is. Meaning 22.6 out of 100 will have gotten screwed. Simple, but not immediately intuitive if you've never had to know how it works.
Sorry for the approximation, the correct number is 22.6% of having at least 1 shot harming. (1-95%^5)
And indeed 20 times is 64% of having at least one shot In IV.
A friend has had 3 AEs, ie 1 AE per shot
Sounds like the proverbial patient who, if his child died with the syringe still in his arm, would chalk it up to coincidence.
My daughter almost certainly received her injection into her vascular system. She had more bleeding than I have seen on any injection or blood draw; coming home with a blood soaked cotton ball and then experiencing subsequent bruising of a large area on her upper arm. Within the next couple of weeks her FitBit notified her several times of elevated heart rate, some of which she sensed and was aware of having. She went to an urgent care center that sent her on to the ER. The ER docs did not find anything signigicant but recommended that she follow up with a cardiologist if she had ongoing issues. She has not done that nor has she had subsequent notifications of any abnormal heart rate.
I pray that this was a short term effect for her. She only received the one J&J shot and has not boosted. There also seems to be a lack of discussion over the long term effects if any of the DNA based shots versus the mRNA,
Both can be harmful. The J&J has 50 bn once. Pfizer has 10bn twice. Clearly on a per dose basis Pfizer would be better than J&J, but with 2 doses, it becomes hard to tell.
So these risks of intravenous injections are not just limited to the covid vaccines, but to all injections/vaccines?
Are there any vaccines you can take? Where the rewards outweigh the risks? 😳
Not sure anymore.
Flu seemed less risky, but useless. And frankly the more I study the more I become a general anti-vaxxer which I wasn't a year ago.
Me too! Breaking out of the endless vaccine propaganda. I would never have questioned so much if the whole COVID vaccine effort had not appeared so nefarious from the start. In some way I guess I’m thankful for the rude awakening.
Me too! I once participated in vaccine studies. After these last few years though I have gone back over my history with a suspicion that the HepB vaccine and study likely was a trigger for my autoimmune issues.
Sorry to hear that.
Bien dit, Monsieur! Well said, Marc.
I wish I could get my friends and family to turn off the TV and read what you and others are working so hard to get out there.
I now inhabit a strange realm where I try to be ready to let go of loved ones who have by default opted to be experimented upon rather than to rely on their mucosal immunity and T-cells to perform a function they've been refining for hundreds of millions of years.
Marc, it may interest you to take a look at the one and only clinical trial in the US for a SARS-CoV vaccine back in 2004. This study was funded and conducted by NIAID.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00099463?recrs=e&cond=Sars+vaccine&phase=0&draw=3&rank=19
Seems like they were scared to use needles:
"Each DNA vaccination will be 1 mL of vaccine administered intramuscularly (in deltoid muscle) using the Biojector 2000 Needle-Free Injection Management System."
Yes, I have worked in the field of DNA vaccine and electro-poration and pressure needle-free injectors were the norm.
I saw an urgent care doctor who said to me: "Don't get the vaccine. I'm trying to get the word out, and it makes me sick that they're pushing it on kids." I almost want to cry when I think of that.
Same here.
Where, if I may ask?? (Approximately... I'm just curious.) I live on Cape Cod, in the northeastern US, and I no longer know where to turn for medical care. My state (Massachusetts) is Pharma Central, and the Covidian Force is very strong here. I've given up on the local clinic I've gone to for almost forty years. I'm wondering how to find a doctor or physician's assistant who has not drunk the Kool-Aid.
Doctors have to treat you whether or not you took the vaccine, correct?
Ignore the vaccine propaganda and don't wear a mask; make them give you one.
The problem is that I won't wear a mask, so I can't even get in the door without making a scene.
I never wore a mask. Several times in 2020 I wore underwear on my head to go grocery shopping, but it still felt like a cop-out and after a while I stopped even doing that.
Eastern Long Island, so that won't help you very much. He was the only doctor that I met who voiced that opinion. My PCP pressured me to get it--spoke to me like a child - I told him off. My gynecologist pressured me also.
The day is coming when insurance CEOs listen to their actuaries, realize the vaccinated are in a higher financial risk category, and raise their premiums.
I thought in the US, smokers' car, medical, life insurance premiums could not be risk-based increased due to discrimination?
Especially when they'll realize they are getting ripped off by hospitals with Long Covid and fake Covid deaths.
I thought for sure insurance companies, with a fiduciary responsibility to investors, would be the first to push against Pharma & the rising claims. Color me surprised, I guess woke does make it into the boardroom.
I heard rules for 401k management has recently been reworded to remove the fiduciary component in order to allow ESG by 401k companies. changes may also happen to life insurers along with government $ to life insurers to keep quiet like gov $ encentivized hospitals to call every diagnosis corid 19.
who would have thought my scientific red flags waking me up at night a few meters away from the Eiffel Tower would end up with taxes, minting dollars and taxes? :-)
Love all these comments. Always filled with common sense and reality.
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1913/richet/lecture/
think you will find this article most relevant to your theory..
So foreign proteins like spike will become a deadly poison with additional exposure?
That was hard to read. The cruelty to the animals! A scientist that can perform such experiments over and over has something wrong upstairs. It’s just sick!
https://twitter.com/MandatorilyFree/status/1604392867090284547?t=hMThTKf4TBMtzC2Vv5WqDQ&s=19
We are so constituted that we can never receive other proteins into the blood than those that have been modified by digestive juices. Every time alien protein penetrates by effraction, the organism suffers and becomes resistant.