110 Comments

Marc, I received your book yesterday and it is fascinating. I will leave a good review on Amazon. You have a delightful voice, very engaging. That being said...would you have any desire to work with a proofreader/editor for subsequent runs? Yes, I have a candidate in mind (not me). And, no, she hasn't said she'd do it. But when I sense a fruitful collaboration might be possible I can't help but do a little probing. Forgive me if this comes across as forward, and if you wish you may tell me to get lost. No harm done, no offense taken. I will still leave a good review!! 🙂

Expand full comment

Thank you for the kind comment. I am very happy you like my work. It's been grueling.

Need to market the book now, and won't have much time for much else. We shall see later. Send me an email, or DM me, I will keep that in mind.

Expand full comment

I understand. My candidate is a professional French to English translator AND interpreter, working for twenty-five years. I have known her since 1978 and recommend her without reservation. She is sympathetic to your thesis. Please forgive me for pressing you, but at least speak with her in case a future collaboration might be desirable.

I have looked for an email address for you, but am not finding one. I would like to pass it along to her directly.

Expand full comment

Thank you!!

Expand full comment

Thank you for taking the time to read me, and hopefully for spreading the good word.

Come back to tell me what you thought of the book.

Expand full comment

I agree, but I also appreciate that Marc is not attempting to reform the entire deceptive sick-care system, camouflaged as a "healthcare" system! It is theoretically possible to have safe and effective vaccines for bacteria-borne illnesses, not that I advocate for their necessity!

Expand full comment

My copy is arriving today, looking forward to getting into it!

Expand full comment

Just got mine ;-). Very happy.

It will be vintage ( typos on the cover :-().

Thank you for your trust. Let's share the word, and if you can post a comment on Amazon later on, that would be swell.

Expand full comment

Of course!

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Mar 25
Expand full comment

What has that got to do with anything?

Are you suggesting the vaccines don't harm?

My friend, Mike Yeadon, wouldn't insult me the way you just did.

I have sacrificed 4 years of my life and my family. And I won't accept the insult.

I agree that viruses are probably not a true problem, but they do exist. There are photos of viruses...so you have to do your homework better, Sir.

What viruses are is an evolutionary interspecies genetic communication without which species cannot benefit of other species' genetic advances...

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Mar 25
Expand full comment

So what you want is that they continue to maim kids until you manage to convince the world that you are right?

Please go and read my book and see my position, but it is absolutely immoral to put one's hubris over the safety of kids. If you manage to get rid of all vaccines next week, I'll follow you, but you won't, then you are to blame for the harm done to these kids. I have seen what this absolute pseudo-stance does, it harms people.

Freedom fighters for 3 years now have done nothing but talk talk talk, not advanced the fate of the kids harmed and given excuse for the continuation and the acceleration of the Armageddon.

I bring a therapeutic solution to help vaccine-injured, I bring a solution to prevent more harm from happening, and I do question seriously the vaccine Ponzi-scheme; What have you done for the world, again? That I make you vomit. Shame on you.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Mar 29
Expand full comment

Look I have fought against the vaccine more than most.

I have seen people harmed for 3 years now by the sort of grand hubristic view that we can stop it all when the vast majority of folks in the world are still bought into the vaccine narrative. And I find it disgusting that people are ok with the fact that everyday people and kids, in particular, are being harmed.

I have read tens of thousands of articles; some included photos of viruses infecting cell-to-cell. The only virus lie is the fact that people say they are very dangerous. The danger seems to come from people's immune fragility more than anything else. But viruses do exist; they are the only way for cross-species genetic evolution acceleration. It's a genetic communication mechanism, or else all species would be stuck in silos, not benefitting from the evolution advances of other species.

Expand full comment

Have ordered the book and look forward to reading it, looking at the table of content I was wondering if you have looked at the bolus theory and a link to type 1 diabetes, my apologies if you have already covered this at all in your substack. Thanks

Expand full comment

Yes, in the chapter on endocrine disorders.

On Substack, I haven't covered endocrine disorders beyond my Xmas article.

Expand full comment

Substack name change proposal:

Mythinformation Medica

Expand full comment

Maybe I start a second one just to use that brand, Franck. Excellent.

Expand full comment

Yes!! Consider me your first paid subscriber 😊👍

Expand full comment

Purchased it and now eagerly waiting for my book to be delivered. Thanks again for all your work!!

Expand full comment

Can I ask you to put a heart-felt genuine comment on Amazon once you've read it? Thank you so much. Word-of-mouth is key. you and his community are the spearheads of this momentum.

Expand full comment

Yes! I will do it as soon as I finish. Very good idea.

Expand full comment

Thank you Tina.

Expand full comment

Marc there was a post by PMcCullough this morning about a russian study of mrna vaccine biodistribution:

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/little-known-about-mrna-and-spike

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/12/1/59?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Correct me if I am wrong, but I remember Japanese researchers did this work early on so am not understanding if the work these researchers have done is new or just different.

Their white paper that is actually readable. the authors labels the vaccine as a "great success" which shows their level of bias. They also say the deployment produced "rare adverse effects". The entire global medical complex seems to have redefined the meaning of "rare".

Expand full comment

I can't believe they still don't understand.

If the vaccine is well injected, the bio distribution is essentially across the body on the endothelium. witha bolus it's a lottery, with a certainty the bolus passes through the lungs, the heart chambers the aorta and the arteries. So considerabl transfcetion occurs there simply bc 100% of the IV dose goes thru, after that it's a russian roulette, but a t a population level it's simply based on endothelial exposure.

Expand full comment

Order placed.

Expand full comment

Thank you so much Inino16.

Can I ask you to put a heart-felt genuine comment on Amazon once you've read it?

Word-of-mouth is key. you and his community are the spearheads of this momentum.

In advance thank you.

Expand full comment

I like The Needle's Secret. I didn't know what bolus meant and actually had to look up the word. Also you are covering more than just covid so don't like covid myth busters.

Expand full comment

Thank you for your input.

Expand full comment

Congratulations on the book! But just to be clear, are you still convinced that vaccines are useful? You just discovered a very beautiful theory which I really liked and the message is that your theory will help the delivery of vaccines in the body?

Expand full comment

Thanks.

Tools can be well used or not. A pickaxe can dig the Suez Canal or kill Trotsky in Mexico.

Tools can be well-designed or not. A car can be ill-designed and drive a mile or drive 200,000 km without a glitch.

But don't blame the tool for any of it. I don't blame vaccines, I blame humans, and I point to their fallibility.

Do I believe all vaccines on the vaccine schedule are needed? Absolutely not.

Do I believe vaccines can work? Yes, vaccines can work, but not in all cases.

Do I believe all vaccines are justified? Absolutely not. Many vaccines are not needed at all. Read my book's conclusion, I address that.

Do I believe that people who believe in vaccines should get them? I believe in the freedom of choice, as long as the technology doesn't harm people, let them have what they want.

Do I believe vaccines should all be stopped today? Probably, but I don't think we will ever achieve that. It's more pragmatic to stop vaccinations until delivery protocols are complied with (ie 100% of the dose goes into the tissue, and zero bolus is created).

Do I believe vaccine can help for cancer? As boosters to T-cells, coordinated with oxygene therapy, fever-inducing strategies...yes.

Expand full comment

I appreciate your response about freedom of choice although why does it have to be conditional? To see a vaccine as a tool is a stretch. First of, a vaccine is supposed to fix a problem that it doesn't seem we understand. Are we sure we know what causes people's illnesses? If we don't, what's the point to come up with a tool? At this stage, a vaccine can be considered a poison maybe but definitely not a tool.

Expand full comment

A tool or a technology...semantics.

If it stimulates your T-cells to attack tumors, Isn't it useful?

You are challenging the rationale for these vaccines; I am, too.

That's a human decision. And I agree with you, yhe rationale is wrong, likely even fraudulent. But that doesn't mean everything is bad about the technology...

Not sure I understand your point on conditional?

Expand full comment

Congratulations! Well done. Order placed 😊

Expand full comment

Thanks for the review btw.

Expand full comment

My pleasure

Expand full comment

Can I ask you to put a truthful comment on Amazon once you've read it? Thank you so much.

Expand full comment

Consider it done 🙏

Expand full comment

Thanks Erik.

Did you get the book yet?

Expand full comment

Its on its way to Norway 😊

Expand full comment

Excellent news,

Thanks

Expand full comment

Thank you Erik! Really appreciate your trust.

Expand full comment

Congratulations! You must be exhausted, relieved, and invigorated all at the same time. It’s a huge accomplishment. Especially under so much pressure. 🙌 Rest up for all the interviews that will follow shortly. :) I look forward to getting my copy.

Expand full comment

Yes, pretty much, can't say am in any position to rest...wish I could.

Thank you for the kind comment Celeste.❤️

Expand full comment

Another name for series…

The Needle’s Razor Edge

Have bought your book. Thanks Marc and God bless!

Expand full comment

Thank you so much.

Interesting...razor edge.

Expand full comment

Rather than “Bolus Theory” why not use the term “Bolus Effect”?

That is, there is evidence and reasoning to prove the thesis, and it’s not just an unproved concept or theory.

A heading/ title for use somehow:

Bolus effect: the needle’s inherent risks

Expand full comment

:-)

A Theory can be proven, thankfully.

A hypothesis remains to be validated.

Unfortunately, the Bolus isn't an effect, maybe the Bolus Effects...

Will stick to the Bolus Theory as it has gained a tiny reputation...and it's really hard to do. Thank you Sunshine :-)

Expand full comment

The jabs are not, never were vaccines. They destroy the body. What a load of bolus

Expand full comment

Congratulations Marc. I will purchase and share 🙌😊

Expand full comment

Thanks Hazel.

Expand full comment