(iii) Acute toxicity elicits two quite different biological effects. The obvious one being inflammation and this response is why aluminium salts are effective adjuvants enabling a potential immune response. However, perhaps less well understood is that Al3+ also acts as an antigen. When the concentration of Al3+ is sufficiently high the body responds by producing antibodies against it. I have written about this recently in my book and in a number of published papers. What this means in the practical terms of human exposure to aluminium is that following vaccination including an aluminium adjuvant, for example as an infant, the body retains a memory of this event.
The critical point is that it requires a sufficiently high concentration of Al3+ somewhere in the body to activate the memory of the previous exposure to aluminium. Actually a vaccination involving an aluminium adjuvant is probably the only time that such a high concentration of Al3+ is achieved in the body.
Exley's explanation is falsified in too many ways:
- it's not specific, not everybody gets harmed with the same dose. That's a no no in science.
- it's not reproducible except if you saturate with aluminium
- if you take out aluminium, you still have the same adverse events (see Covid vaccines)
- the idea that in everyone the aluminium gets stuck is preposterous, the endothelium lawyer takes what it needs from the blood, not anything that passes.
- Why is Alzheimer age-sensitive if aluminium is the cause? Amyloids start accumulating when the imune system ages. Amyloids form daily everywhere, and we deal with it. They enter in the brain because of a leaky BBB (and aluminium would have a very hard time doing that. Tcells do it).
- Aluminium has a natural antibody which albumine, present i huge quantities compared to the doses injected. I did the calculation. The body has well enough albumine to neutralize and evacuate aluminium.
- Not sure how the body can make antibodies against an atom, that is not the scale the immune system works...
For me, Exley's theories are false. That doesn't mean one should inject Aluminium, but just like mercury at very low dose the body can deal with it. As a Bolus, it ay participate, but frankly the vaccine is cytotoxic already...
I suggest you actually take the time to go and read Dr Exleys substack thoroughly, especially the last several posts. I know you are convinced in what you are saying but I remain unconvinced by your arguments against Aluminium as a dangerous part of the vaccine regime. After vaccinations it doesn't leave to body. It goes somewhere. Dr Exley lays out a clear pathway of how it can get into the brain. Dr Exley's post-mortem brain studies of autistic and alzheimers patients shows that they have very hich levels of aluminium compared to normal controls. This is a fact. Also, it is a fact that Aliminium is cytotoxic. Dr Exley's articles actually answer most, if not all, of your points above. So go and actually read all of them. https://drchristopherexley.substack.com/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email Cheers, Adrian
Dr's Newsletter dons a white coat and stethoscope to offer a definitive diagnosis
DR CHRISTOPHER EXLEY
MAY 23
During those heady days when I straddled the globe pontificating on aluminium to anyone who would listen, and some who would not, I once testified in a vaccine court. The case was, to my mind, simple enough, an infant brain damaged following multiple vaccinations that included aluminium adjuvants. Simple to my mind was not so simple in law. There was no direct evidence that aluminium, never mind aluminium administered in a vaccine, was the culprit. I hear this argument a lot including from a lawyer in the last few days. I am told that there are no experiments to show that aluminium adjuvants are toxic in humans, where are the clinical studies they ask. On serious reflection anyone asking such a question appreciates that we do not perform toxicity experiments on humans, well at least not in plain sight.
In truth the law is well aware of this and in the case of the vaccine damaged infant it was only necessary to offer a reasonable, scientifically sound mechanism of possible toxicity. Various neurologists had already diagnosed encephalopathy (accelerated loss of neurones in a significant part of the brain) as an underlying cause of the infant’s symptoms. My role was to inform the court about the history of aluminium-induced encephalopathy, often referred to as dialysis encephalopathy, and to provide a mechanism whereby neurotoxic aluminium would result in brain damage almost immediately following vaccination involving aluminium adjuvants.
Dialysis encephalopathy, as the term suggests, occurs when individuals are dialysed using tap water contaminated with aluminium. The use of tap water in dialysis was common practice throughout the UK (and indeed Europe and the US) in the latter half of the last century. Even after Alfrey wrote about this in a landmark paper published in The Lancet in the mid-seventies the practice continued and may even be continuing today in some parts of the world. The brain tissue of those who died due to dialysis encephalopathy was loaded with aluminium. Those who survived did so due to early treatment to remove aluminium from the body using the iron chelator desferrioxamine (DFO). These observations provided incontrovertible evidence of the neurotoxicity of aluminium in humans, perhaps these unfortunate circumstances actually provide the human experiments much craved by lawyers and elsewhere.
So how might vaccination involving aluminium adjuvants substitute for dialysis in bringing about an encephalopathy in an infant. Dialysis using tap water contaminated with aluminium loaded the bloodstream with aluminium. The contaminated tap water provided a continuous source of aluminium over extended periods of dialysis. Aluminium is distributed between many different compartments in blood, those of you interested in this will enjoy reading my post on this subject, The Blood-Aluminium Problem.
These compartments influence the uptake of aluminium from the blood into the brain across the blood-brain barrier.
However, unlike contaminated tap water and dialysis, aluminium adjuvants administered in vaccines cannot be considered as a continuous supply of aluminium to the bloodstream and hence the brain. They are an acute exposure to aluminium at the vaccine injection site and the body attempts to counter this acute exposure by accumulating aluminium adjuvant in phagocytic cells such as macrophages attracted to the vaccine injection site. These cells loaded with aluminium remain viable for days, possibly weeks and this means that they may carry their toxic cargo throughout the body. We have observed such cells on either side of the blood-brain barrier in brain tissue from donors who died with a diagnosis of autism. This observation provides the link with dialysis encephalopathy. Cells loaded with aluminium and originating from vaccine injection sites transport neurotoxic levels of aluminium into brain tissue in susceptible vaccinated infants. When the aluminium-loaded cells die, as is inevitable due to their cargo of aluminium, they deposit aluminium in brain tissue causing further toxicity, inflammation and an ensuing encephalopathy.
Thankfully we do not have experiments on infants demonstrating the neurotoxicity of aluminium adjuvants. However, we do have sound and irrefutable scientific evidence of a plausible mechanism whereby aluminium adjuvants could be responsible for an encephalopathy in a vaccinated infant. This SHOULD carry the day in vaccine court and elsewhere.
The attribution of vaccine adverse events/effects to aluminium adjuvants is not always as straightforward as in the case of infant encephalopathy. In adolescents and adults vaccine damage may be even more difficult to prove and particularly where the damage seems to centre upon a general malaise. This will be the subject of Part 2.
I have already argued with Dr Exley. If Aluminium is not specific, then another factor comes in to play. Aluminium as a bolus can possibly be toxic, doubt it would be more toxic than vaccines themselves. But in any case, many people get the same dos eof Aluminium and are fine. If infused the levels of aluminium given are acceptable mathematically given the overwhelming presence of Albumine.
> After vaccinations Aluminium leaves the blood but does NOT leave the body. It is stored/accumulated in body tissues/organs.
> Brain autopsies carried out by Dr Exley show that people suffering from Autism and Alzheimer’s Disease have very high levels of Aluminium in their Brains compared to healthy controls
In your research, have you found doctors who have figured out how to diagnose and treat the various symptoms from vaccine injuries or long haul covid? Particularly the extreme cases like fatigue so severe as to be bed ridden for months?
Do you know if it is true that there is no commercially-available test for the presence of spike protein in your body? Dr. McCullough and others have said that spike protein from the injections or from SARS-COV2 infection or from shedding is causing all the problems. To remove spike protein he is currently recommending The Wellness Company's Spike Support supplement, along with bromelain and curcumin (a mouthful of tablets and pills taken twice a day for up to a year or more (!). If there is no test for spike protein how will we know if this regimen is removing the spike?
The root cause is a significant enough dose goes directly IV during injection at a 300,000x concentration that can cause concentrated damage (1) on the walls of the cardiovascular system and (2) in the capillaries of organs/systems, or (3) reach hidden-away stem-cell.
(1) explains for white-clot syndrome, aneurysms, arteriosclerosis, fistulas, angiomas and thrombosis
(2) explains for micro-thrombosis, embolism, necrosis and micro-perforation (neurodegenerative disease, endocrine disorders, infertility, leaky gut, organ failure, neuropathies, asthma, hearing impairment, Bowel disorders, ...)
:-) I only have one book I recently published: "The Needle's Secret" available on Amazon. Don't hesitate to share the word. Feel free to contact me with any questions.
Hi! You've written an extremely eloquent post, and what you write is full of truth. One man alone can't do this work--everyone who benefits from it must tell their friends and families. Your mention of Chris Cuomo gave me a thought. Cuomo is now on an app called Minnect which is free to download on your phone. Using Minnect, you can pay money to send a text and recieve a personal reply from a subject expert. It costs $30 to send one text to Cuomo, and I think $1000 to have a 15 minute phone chat. What if we crowd source $1000 for Marc to call Chris Cuomo? Or is there anyone else on Minnect who could have a big impact?
Thanks Tina. It's a great idea (as usual :-)). But frankly, I am sure we can get Chris Cuomo for free. Simply the Bolus Theory needs more supporters on X. It's building up, but still not the critical mass. I need to do a John Campbell every day... How do we do that?
Hmmm...good question. I also wonder about doing more European podcasts. I think that probably English language podcasting has the largest audience in the Western hemisphere???? But I am feeling like anglophone culture is terrible at enacting positive change these days (and I say this as a native English speaker). Anglophone culture is so politically driven right now that wise ideas can't seem to get enough oxygen to survive. I wonder if you could do a bunch of Scandinavian podcasts in English?
I wish that I could connect you with someone, but I don't know anyone...And of course, continuing with English language podcasts is important and meaningful. I'm just feeling that as the US election nears, we are all being digitally manipulated away from ideas of positive change and reconciliation. There are some podcasters who seem to follow a higher ideal, though. Could you and Dr. John Campbell get a spot together on Russell Brand's show? I know Dr. John has been on Brand's podcast before.
I was just reading the following substack article about disease provocation by vaccination causing diseases that people were being inoculated against. Is this something you have read or researched for the book? I have not read your book yet but it is in my stack of "to read". Just thought you might find the examples interesting to read about and explain with the bolus theory. So in my mind - perhaps the damage by the vaccines to the endothelium due to the bolus is causing the immune system to be occupied fixing the damage and so it is easier to succumb to a different disease - like the example of patients who have had surgery having a drop in immune function while the wound is healing.
It's obvious that if you have cancer, you don't want to deplete Tcells.
Most of the Vaccine AIDS is likely more related to transient blood-bone marrow barrier damage. In some cases, the bone marrow is necrosed, and overall immune capacity is reduced...
Hi Jackeroo. I've wondered the same thing, since they've found that some vax injured have "reactivated" viruses. I thought maybe instead of "reactivated", rather it's "unchecked" viruses do to overtaxed immune system.
This is marvellous stuff! And, if we take one step further back, there is a very simple, high-level reason why vaccination makes no conceptual sense, as is revealed instantly when people look at all cause mortality, instead of at the target disease alone. That usually provides the clue. So it is by focusing overly narrowly on one set of symptoms, presumed to be a disease, in the system as a whole, vaccines cause illness, they don't prevent it.
If the immune system is arguably a complex, multi-variate system and we sub-optimize it for a few variables, it is no surprise that the system as a whole malfunctions.
If you design a car engine for fuel economy only, you will have a shoddy engine with lousy performance. You have to satisfy multiple criteria at the same time, cost effectiveness, performance, fuel economy, durability, manageable maintenance, and a few more. What doctors and pharma companies do is they point to a symptom, make it go away, never mind what happens to the rest of the system, and they call the patient cured if they don't return. They've been getting away with this for a hundred years already, but it makes no sense at all.
This is one of those powerful articles that impacts us deeply and quietly forms a personal position on an issue. In the weeks to come we may not remember the article because our Inbox these days is becoming almost impossible. Thank you for another straw that is hopefully going to break the back of the satanic vaccination ideology.
Does the book (or your research) focus specifically on vaccines or do other types of shots have similar problems such as allergy shots, vitamin shots, etc.? I'm wondering if the harm is being caused by some molecule that is specifically in most vaccines or if practically all concentrated foreign chemicals are creating some type of harm?
The book focuses on vaccines and ties them to all modern-day illnesses. But the book briefly mentions other injections can harm also, notably by saturation, and if they can contaminate stem cells as a bolus, there is a possibility to trigger cancer and genetic disorders.
Vitamins, anesthetics, contrast agents, steroids (with POME), toxins and evidently venoms all also are subject to the Bolus Theory. For example, a bee sting in blood vessel will kill you.
Hi Marc. I think this is an important piece you could flesh out more for your viewers. You"re good at details and I think the details make the difference in understanding fully your theory.
In your interviews, you could talk about how the other "poisons" (bee sting, vitamins, contrast agents, steroids, etc.) can also harm, but explain the difference between these and the purposefully/intentionally transfecting quality of the COVID vaccine and how they trigger the immune response. Lots of people seem to still miss this point. You sometimes allude to the difference when you talk about Flu vaccines, but it's not enough. I would spell out how the different vaccines can harm, especially if they're not designed the same way. I think this would go a long way to help paint a full picture for your audience.
https://drchristopherexley.substack.com/p/definitely-aluminium-poisoning-part-73d?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=730345&post_id=145668939&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=koezg&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
(iii) Acute toxicity elicits two quite different biological effects. The obvious one being inflammation and this response is why aluminium salts are effective adjuvants enabling a potential immune response. However, perhaps less well understood is that Al3+ also acts as an antigen. When the concentration of Al3+ is sufficiently high the body responds by producing antibodies against it. I have written about this recently in my book and in a number of published papers. What this means in the practical terms of human exposure to aluminium is that following vaccination including an aluminium adjuvant, for example as an infant, the body retains a memory of this event.
The critical point is that it requires a sufficiently high concentration of Al3+ somewhere in the body to activate the memory of the previous exposure to aluminium. Actually a vaccination involving an aluminium adjuvant is probably the only time that such a high concentration of Al3+ is achieved in the body.
Dear Adrian,
I hope this finds you well.
Thanks for this.
Exley's explanation is falsified in too many ways:
- it's not specific, not everybody gets harmed with the same dose. That's a no no in science.
- it's not reproducible except if you saturate with aluminium
- if you take out aluminium, you still have the same adverse events (see Covid vaccines)
- the idea that in everyone the aluminium gets stuck is preposterous, the endothelium lawyer takes what it needs from the blood, not anything that passes.
- Why is Alzheimer age-sensitive if aluminium is the cause? Amyloids start accumulating when the imune system ages. Amyloids form daily everywhere, and we deal with it. They enter in the brain because of a leaky BBB (and aluminium would have a very hard time doing that. Tcells do it).
- Aluminium has a natural antibody which albumine, present i huge quantities compared to the doses injected. I did the calculation. The body has well enough albumine to neutralize and evacuate aluminium.
- Not sure how the body can make antibodies against an atom, that is not the scale the immune system works...
For me, Exley's theories are false. That doesn't mean one should inject Aluminium, but just like mercury at very low dose the body can deal with it. As a Bolus, it ay participate, but frankly the vaccine is cytotoxic already...
https://vaccinepapers.org/about/
https://jbhandley.substack.com/p/international-scientists-have-found
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/how-vaccines-cause-autism
Hi Marc,
I suggest you actually take the time to go and read Dr Exleys substack thoroughly, especially the last several posts. I know you are convinced in what you are saying but I remain unconvinced by your arguments against Aluminium as a dangerous part of the vaccine regime. After vaccinations it doesn't leave to body. It goes somewhere. Dr Exley lays out a clear pathway of how it can get into the brain. Dr Exley's post-mortem brain studies of autistic and alzheimers patients shows that they have very hich levels of aluminium compared to normal controls. This is a fact. Also, it is a fact that Aliminium is cytotoxic. Dr Exley's articles actually answer most, if not all, of your points above. So go and actually read all of them. https://drchristopherexley.substack.com/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email Cheers, Adrian
A complementary (I think) view:
https://drchristopherexley.substack.com/p/definitely-aluminium-poisoning-part?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=730345&post_id=144908555&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=koezg&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Definitely Aluminium Poisoning (Part One)
Dr's Newsletter dons a white coat and stethoscope to offer a definitive diagnosis
DR CHRISTOPHER EXLEY
MAY 23
During those heady days when I straddled the globe pontificating on aluminium to anyone who would listen, and some who would not, I once testified in a vaccine court. The case was, to my mind, simple enough, an infant brain damaged following multiple vaccinations that included aluminium adjuvants. Simple to my mind was not so simple in law. There was no direct evidence that aluminium, never mind aluminium administered in a vaccine, was the culprit. I hear this argument a lot including from a lawyer in the last few days. I am told that there are no experiments to show that aluminium adjuvants are toxic in humans, where are the clinical studies they ask. On serious reflection anyone asking such a question appreciates that we do not perform toxicity experiments on humans, well at least not in plain sight.
In truth the law is well aware of this and in the case of the vaccine damaged infant it was only necessary to offer a reasonable, scientifically sound mechanism of possible toxicity. Various neurologists had already diagnosed encephalopathy (accelerated loss of neurones in a significant part of the brain) as an underlying cause of the infant’s symptoms. My role was to inform the court about the history of aluminium-induced encephalopathy, often referred to as dialysis encephalopathy, and to provide a mechanism whereby neurotoxic aluminium would result in brain damage almost immediately following vaccination involving aluminium adjuvants.
Dialysis encephalopathy, as the term suggests, occurs when individuals are dialysed using tap water contaminated with aluminium. The use of tap water in dialysis was common practice throughout the UK (and indeed Europe and the US) in the latter half of the last century. Even after Alfrey wrote about this in a landmark paper published in The Lancet in the mid-seventies the practice continued and may even be continuing today in some parts of the world. The brain tissue of those who died due to dialysis encephalopathy was loaded with aluminium. Those who survived did so due to early treatment to remove aluminium from the body using the iron chelator desferrioxamine (DFO). These observations provided incontrovertible evidence of the neurotoxicity of aluminium in humans, perhaps these unfortunate circumstances actually provide the human experiments much craved by lawyers and elsewhere.
So how might vaccination involving aluminium adjuvants substitute for dialysis in bringing about an encephalopathy in an infant. Dialysis using tap water contaminated with aluminium loaded the bloodstream with aluminium. The contaminated tap water provided a continuous source of aluminium over extended periods of dialysis. Aluminium is distributed between many different compartments in blood, those of you interested in this will enjoy reading my post on this subject, The Blood-Aluminium Problem.
These compartments influence the uptake of aluminium from the blood into the brain across the blood-brain barrier.
However, unlike contaminated tap water and dialysis, aluminium adjuvants administered in vaccines cannot be considered as a continuous supply of aluminium to the bloodstream and hence the brain. They are an acute exposure to aluminium at the vaccine injection site and the body attempts to counter this acute exposure by accumulating aluminium adjuvant in phagocytic cells such as macrophages attracted to the vaccine injection site. These cells loaded with aluminium remain viable for days, possibly weeks and this means that they may carry their toxic cargo throughout the body. We have observed such cells on either side of the blood-brain barrier in brain tissue from donors who died with a diagnosis of autism. This observation provides the link with dialysis encephalopathy. Cells loaded with aluminium and originating from vaccine injection sites transport neurotoxic levels of aluminium into brain tissue in susceptible vaccinated infants. When the aluminium-loaded cells die, as is inevitable due to their cargo of aluminium, they deposit aluminium in brain tissue causing further toxicity, inflammation and an ensuing encephalopathy.
Thankfully we do not have experiments on infants demonstrating the neurotoxicity of aluminium adjuvants. However, we do have sound and irrefutable scientific evidence of a plausible mechanism whereby aluminium adjuvants could be responsible for an encephalopathy in a vaccinated infant. This SHOULD carry the day in vaccine court and elsewhere.
The attribution of vaccine adverse events/effects to aluminium adjuvants is not always as straightforward as in the case of infant encephalopathy. In adolescents and adults vaccine damage may be even more difficult to prove and particularly where the damage seems to centre upon a general malaise. This will be the subject of Part 2.
I have already argued with Dr Exley. If Aluminium is not specific, then another factor comes in to play. Aluminium as a bolus can possibly be toxic, doubt it would be more toxic than vaccines themselves. But in any case, many people get the same dos eof Aluminium and are fine. If infused the levels of aluminium given are acceptable mathematically given the overwhelming presence of Albumine.
Hi Marc, Albumine or not studies indicate that:
> Aluminium is cytotoxic
> After vaccinations Aluminium leaves the blood but does NOT leave the body. It is stored/accumulated in body tissues/organs.
> Brain autopsies carried out by Dr Exley show that people suffering from Autism and Alzheimer’s Disease have very high levels of Aluminium in their Brains compared to healthy controls
In your research, have you found doctors who have figured out how to diagnose and treat the various symptoms from vaccine injuries or long haul covid? Particularly the extreme cases like fatigue so severe as to be bed ridden for months?
I have explained via root-cause analysis most, if not all, the symptoms post vaccines. Please read my articles or ideally my book.
This is a good start:
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/a-flawed-medical-procedure-x-billions
Best, Marc
Doctors have been treating many similar symptoms by stimulating stem cells with oxygen therapy (ideally HBOT, but not only). Read my book.
Do you know if it is true that there is no commercially-available test for the presence of spike protein in your body? Dr. McCullough and others have said that spike protein from the injections or from SARS-COV2 infection or from shedding is causing all the problems. To remove spike protein he is currently recommending The Wellness Company's Spike Support supplement, along with bromelain and curcumin (a mouthful of tablets and pills taken twice a day for up to a year or more (!). If there is no test for spike protein how will we know if this regimen is removing the spike?
Hi Douglas,
Spike protein is neutralized by antibodies as it should.
See Ogata et al. Nattokinase and Bromelain are fibrinolytic, so they are useful for plaque and for clots, not for spike protein neutralization.
In some rare cases, people can possibly continue to produce spike (see my book), but again that is not the root cause of the problem.
Thank you, that is helpful. What IS the root cause? (Please use layman language. I have just discovered you and I'm sure I have a lot to catch up on.)
The root cause is a significant enough dose goes directly IV during injection at a 300,000x concentration that can cause concentrated damage (1) on the walls of the cardiovascular system and (2) in the capillaries of organs/systems, or (3) reach hidden-away stem-cell.
(1) explains for white-clot syndrome, aneurysms, arteriosclerosis, fistulas, angiomas and thrombosis
(2) explains for micro-thrombosis, embolism, necrosis and micro-perforation (neurodegenerative disease, endocrine disorders, infertility, leaky gut, organ failure, neuropathies, asthma, hearing impairment, Bowel disorders, ...)
(3) explains for cancer and genetic disorders.
Which of your books is/are best for this subject?
:-) I only have one book I recently published: "The Needle's Secret" available on Amazon. Don't hesitate to share the word. Feel free to contact me with any questions.
Just purchased. Here is a summary and link for Dr. Lee Merritt's recent interview with Dr. Jane Ruby where Dr. Merritt claims spike protein is part of a COVID hoax/psyop: https://liveyosemite.wordpress.com/2024/05/14/dr-lee-merritt-spike-protein-is-a-hoax/
Hi! You've written an extremely eloquent post, and what you write is full of truth. One man alone can't do this work--everyone who benefits from it must tell their friends and families. Your mention of Chris Cuomo gave me a thought. Cuomo is now on an app called Minnect which is free to download on your phone. Using Minnect, you can pay money to send a text and recieve a personal reply from a subject expert. It costs $30 to send one text to Cuomo, and I think $1000 to have a 15 minute phone chat. What if we crowd source $1000 for Marc to call Chris Cuomo? Or is there anyone else on Minnect who could have a big impact?
Thanks Tina. It's a great idea (as usual :-)). But frankly, I am sure we can get Chris Cuomo for free. Simply the Bolus Theory needs more supporters on X. It's building up, but still not the critical mass. I need to do a John Campbell every day... How do we do that?
Hmmm...good question. I also wonder about doing more European podcasts. I think that probably English language podcasting has the largest audience in the Western hemisphere???? But I am feeling like anglophone culture is terrible at enacting positive change these days (and I say this as a native English speaker). Anglophone culture is so politically driven right now that wise ideas can't seem to get enough oxygen to survive. I wonder if you could do a bunch of Scandinavian podcasts in English?
I would be happy to. Just don't know who to reach out to...
I wish that I could connect you with someone, but I don't know anyone...And of course, continuing with English language podcasts is important and meaningful. I'm just feeling that as the US election nears, we are all being digitally manipulated away from ideas of positive change and reconciliation. There are some podcasters who seem to follow a higher ideal, though. Could you and Dr. John Campbell get a spot together on Russell Brand's show? I know Dr. John has been on Brand's podcast before.
I was just reading the following substack article about disease provocation by vaccination causing diseases that people were being inoculated against. Is this something you have read or researched for the book? I have not read your book yet but it is in my stack of "to read". Just thought you might find the examples interesting to read about and explain with the bolus theory. So in my mind - perhaps the damage by the vaccines to the endothelium due to the bolus is causing the immune system to be occupied fixing the damage and so it is easier to succumb to a different disease - like the example of patients who have had surgery having a drop in immune function while the wound is healing.
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-science-of-vaccine?
It's obvious that if you have cancer, you don't want to deplete Tcells.
Most of the Vaccine AIDS is likely more related to transient blood-bone marrow barrier damage. In some cases, the bone marrow is necrosed, and overall immune capacity is reduced...
Hi Jackeroo. I've wondered the same thing, since they've found that some vax injured have "reactivated" viruses. I thought maybe instead of "reactivated", rather it's "unchecked" viruses do to overtaxed immune system.
This is marvellous stuff! And, if we take one step further back, there is a very simple, high-level reason why vaccination makes no conceptual sense, as is revealed instantly when people look at all cause mortality, instead of at the target disease alone. That usually provides the clue. So it is by focusing overly narrowly on one set of symptoms, presumed to be a disease, in the system as a whole, vaccines cause illness, they don't prevent it.
If the immune system is arguably a complex, multi-variate system and we sub-optimize it for a few variables, it is no surprise that the system as a whole malfunctions.
If you design a car engine for fuel economy only, you will have a shoddy engine with lousy performance. You have to satisfy multiple criteria at the same time, cost effectiveness, performance, fuel economy, durability, manageable maintenance, and a few more. What doctors and pharma companies do is they point to a symptom, make it go away, never mind what happens to the rest of the system, and they call the patient cured if they don't return. They've been getting away with this for a hundred years already, but it makes no sense at all.
https://substack.com/@rogierfvv24/note/c-56036700?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=8tut8
Hi! Marc, for some reason this post is not showing up on the "home page" of "The Bolus Theory Series" substack yet.
Voilà, Tina :-))
It's natively in the archive. I need to push it up. ;-)
Perfect! Merci :)
Any way I can acquire this book without using amazon?
Today no. They are much more equitable than any publisher will ever be.
When I am out of financial distress, I will be able to send it directly to a few readers.
But, Amazon is 15x more equitable than any other publisher.
I apologize, but I have no other option right now. Best. Marc
This is one of those powerful articles that impacts us deeply and quietly forms a personal position on an issue. In the weeks to come we may not remember the article because our Inbox these days is becoming almost impossible. Thank you for another straw that is hopefully going to break the back of the satanic vaccination ideology.
Thank you, Douglas. Please share the article and possibly one video. I hope you'll enjoy the book. Best. Marc
Does the book (or your research) focus specifically on vaccines or do other types of shots have similar problems such as allergy shots, vitamin shots, etc.? I'm wondering if the harm is being caused by some molecule that is specifically in most vaccines or if practically all concentrated foreign chemicals are creating some type of harm?
The book focuses on vaccines and ties them to all modern-day illnesses. But the book briefly mentions other injections can harm also, notably by saturation, and if they can contaminate stem cells as a bolus, there is a possibility to trigger cancer and genetic disorders.
Vitamins, anesthetics, contrast agents, steroids (with POME), toxins and evidently venoms all also are subject to the Bolus Theory. For example, a bee sting in blood vessel will kill you.
Hi Marc. I think this is an important piece you could flesh out more for your viewers. You"re good at details and I think the details make the difference in understanding fully your theory.
In your interviews, you could talk about how the other "poisons" (bee sting, vitamins, contrast agents, steroids, etc.) can also harm, but explain the difference between these and the purposefully/intentionally transfecting quality of the COVID vaccine and how they trigger the immune response. Lots of people seem to still miss this point. You sometimes allude to the difference when you talk about Flu vaccines, but it's not enough. I would spell out how the different vaccines can harm, especially if they're not designed the same way. I think this would go a long way to help paint a full picture for your audience.
Thanks Jean-Pierre. very useful comment.
I did just that yesterday in a Podcast. :-)
Great!