58 Comments

Marc, though this may seem nuts, these injections are not “experimental”. That word has legal meaning in regulated pharmaceutical products.

Because these are not such products, they were not not ever can be experimental. Instead they are “countermeasures”, deployed in any “emergency”, as decided in the sole discretion of the sec state of Health and Human Services (HHS).

In this way, all legal action brought against anyone on the grounds I in my past life would recognize as reasonable will all fail. This is how Brooke Jackson’s case foundered & also the one in the link below.

I must also plead with you to accept that bad injection procedures are not dominant in harms resulting from their administration. While your argument may well have merit in administration of pharmaceutical products, these are designed intentionally to cause harm, to kill & to reduce fertility.

This isn’t a conspiracy theory, but the determination of an experienced and well regarded professional scientist who spent their entire career in pharmaceutical R&D, practising what is called “rational drug design”.

Every atom of a synthetic drug is there because someone chose to include it. They chose it for a reason. With that as backdrop, I carefully reviewed the design of these gene based preparations and easily found several, obvious & unequivocally dangerous characteristics (axiomatic autoimmunity, direct toxicity, ovarian accumulation & uncontrolled extent of protein expression). Molecular biologists found several more, relating to nuclear entry (an undesirable feature, to say the least).

These are not obscure, hard to see characteristics. Each is obvious to any senior R&D scientist in the Biopharma industry. They cannot be there by accident or inadvertently. They cannot be argued to have been necessary, despite the risks, in order to accomplish certain therapeutic objectives, which were so urgently required because of a public health emergency.

That’s a critical point. There is no public health emergency. That’s why those ordering us around were themselves not fearful. They knew there was nothing unusual happening. The only frightening thing happening is the collaboration between “elites”, governments, corporates, media, tech etc in maintaining the lie. There were several objectives, one of which was to kill & injure large numbers of people.

Best wishes

Mike

Ps: the best person I know to describe the awful, creeping changes to law, which has made this “legal”, is Katherine xxxx.

https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/eua-countermeasures-are-neither-investigational?r=gop0d&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

Expand full comment
author

My Dear Mike,

I hope this finds you well. Happy to hear from you. It's been a while. I enjoyed your video for the Parliament hearing. Well done.

I don't use the term experimental. So I am not so sure why you are mentioning it?

Apparently, no one in the pharma industry uses the root-cause analysis technique. In auto we use it to the bone, and that's what I did. I never jump to conclusion. To the exception of my "escape-by-replication" stem cell conjecture, all the rest of the bolus theory is entirely proven, tested and validated.

I agree with you that there is criminal intent in this crisis. The manipulation of the media is one. The nudging and the harassment by the military or special unist is another.

The continuation of vaccination, double/triple downing, despite very early signs of harm is clearly a crime against humanity. There is no doubt in my mind there.

Where I respectfully disagree with you is on the vaccine being designed to cause harm. They simply took their anticancer platform, and plugged the spike proteome on it.

For design criminal intent to be true, harm would need to be reproducible systematically. And that's demonstrably false: Billions have been vaccinated and have had no harm, and they do carry antibodies (so it wasn't placebo). In science, reproducibility is an absolute must. That is evidently not the case with these vaccines. Same with animals. IM injection are fine (even there were not sure they don't go IV some times). IV aren't. IV in animals produced the exact same AEs....and had pre-COVID with other platforms.

Remember all vaccines are poisonous. And all vaccines create the same adverse events. HPV, smallpox, MMR are no different.

I am happy to see that now everybody acknowledges what I stated 3 years ago which is that transfected cells that are immune sensitive (like endothelial cells) will all be destroyed. So I agree it is crazy to inject even in the muscle 10 billion cytotoxic particles, even if they rarely transfect).

I have looked into vaccine dosage. though it is crazy high. The Pfizer vaccine is well dosed. Moderna is ok. when I compare them with bee or spider venom for example. It is only when an IV happens that very briefly the concentration is such that it can be harmful. There's a huge magnifying glass effect 270,000x.

The reality of wounds shows concentrated transfection. That is a physical and mathematical impossibility with an infused dose via muscle tissue. The vascular system disseminates. If it doesn't, it means it was bypassed.

This means that all the vaccines have been harming for decades, and that explains the general deterioration of health in the West: cancer, arteriosclerosis, neurodegenerative disease, autism, endocrine disorders... The fight goes beyond COVID vaccines. Pharma and the medical world have been invisibly harming the population for decades...

A big hug, mon ami. tell me if you are in Paris.

All the best,

Marc

Expand full comment
author

BTW I believe that some degree of IV is happening every time, it just so happens that some times it's far away from the needle that the dose is very very small.

Expand full comment

Katherine Watt:

https://open.substack.com/pub/bailiwicknews/p/construction-of-the-kill-box-legal?r=gop0d&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

Pps: Marc, you probably know all this, but many readers will not. I placed my comments here with all in mind. Best wishes and thanks for all your efforts to save people from harm, from whatever cause & motivation.

Expand full comment

I disagree, because it's a horrible mistake to have mass injection campaigns at all.

First, it's a gross violation of the basic human right to bodily autonomy require vaccines.

Second, they are harmful.

Third, the are unnecessary. Every disease for which there is a vaccine was declining before vaccines ever entered the scene, mostly as a result of better sanitation.

Expand full comment
author
Nov 28, 2023·edited Nov 28, 2023Author

I never said they were needed.

You have 2 alternatives:

- be ambitious and oblivious of the harm committed, wait another 30 yrs for vaccine to be banished,

- or focud on stopping harm from happening now, even if they continue with their scandalous vaccines.

I go for what's achievable and most effective in saving folk and kids asap.

Expand full comment

After reading Toby Rogers’ work I’m convinced all vaccines need to be halted. It appears that none of the childhood (or adult) schedule is worthwhile or minimally safe.

The book “Turtles all the way down” was an eye opener as well.

Expand full comment
author

I don't disagree.

I have written many article on the vaccine Ponzi.

I am just trying to be most effective at reducing harm.

A grand standing is not the most effective way to stop harm. Address root cause of harm first, protocol breach. If we get this public, we can stop harm almost instantly.

Expand full comment

Hi, Marc. I can hear your frustration from some of the comments. I urge you not to quit as your cause is important. These comments come not from a place of malice, but rather an indication of ignorance that will hopefully be self-corrected!

Expand full comment
Nov 27, 2023Liked by Marc Girardot

Your dentist analogy not far off. Nanotechnology by design found in dental anaesthetic via dark field microscopy.

Expand full comment

This solution would back Gates and his “ Patch” designed “vaccine” delivery already in the works and lined up as the solution- don’t think they already knew of the fatal Bolus!!!! It’s never been a mistake.

They knew the deliverers would deliver on target!

Expand full comment
author

Georgina,

I was amongst the first to say they were dangerous, not needed, and they couldn't work. The patch should normally solve the harm. That in of itself would be great, because we want to stop this asap as possible.

Our high horses position these past 3 years have cost millions of life and damaged hundreds of millions of lives.

So between patches today and stopping vaccines in 5 to 10 years. I'll take the patches bc it'll save millions of children now.

I agree that it's a scam, and they should likely be cancelled, but our duty to the children precedes my ego and my grand standing. I hope you understand.

Expand full comment

"if you are surgeon and cut open folks"

They do enormous damage. Every surgery means aeroallergen contamination of wound thus asthma induction.

They cut off organs they don't understand:

https://www.medpagetoday.com/surgery/thoracicsurgery/105729

Vaccines and Biologics injury table based on mechanistic evidence – Feb 2020 Covering over 125 conditions

https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.2582634

Expand full comment
author

They also do great service. They saved my best friend's life last week.

Expand full comment

For trauma, may be. In many cases the heroics are needed for the damage they caused.

Stephen Colbert's appendicitis, for example. Heart disease is vaccine-induced.

Expand full comment

Absolutely.

Vaccine safety: Learning from the Boeing 737 MAX disasters

https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.2648251

BTW, I am another ex-Cisco engineer.

Expand full comment
author

Really. In San Jose?

I am ex-Cisco, but not an engineer.

Expand full comment

Yes, San Jose.

Expand full comment
author

Was at Cisco from 2000 to 2015. Great peoole, learnt a lot and had a lot of fun.

Expand full comment

1996-2014.

Expand full comment
author

much better stock timing :-)) than mine

Expand full comment

Thank you, Marc, for your selfless and engineous pursuit of the painful truth in this important subject. I have a series of related questions. What is the mechanism/reason for the occurrence of tase in the mouth and IV injection. Is it always the same taste regardless of the injected material? What taste is it? Would a deliberate IV injection of, say a dye, cause a tase in the mouth, the same taste as incidental vaccine IV injection?

Expand full comment
author

Taste isn't necessarily systematic as the bolus would not necessarily hit there. It could go to the heart, the liver or the foot.

It has been known to have different tastes for different products: mRNA is metal, steroids is spicy (I believe). I presume it's our taste receptors that detect it...never dove more. Could be a different reason.

The only certainty is that it is a confirmation of a direct IV injection.

Expand full comment

Is that taste typical for a vaccination ?

Because, I have injected myself for more than 30 years with an Rx med, a few times a day for several days every month, regularly causing a hematoma on my thigh. Never tasted anything.

I was given iron shots in my butt, and those are famous for causing a metallic taste that lasts for days.

Expand full comment
author

Sorry I had missed this comment Antoinette.

I know that Trenbolone, a steroid, has a spicy taste. COVID vaccines have a metallic taste. Given the speed it's probably sensory, more than neuronal.

Expand full comment

Marc - as I read thru this piece I found myself aware of a potential harm in your hypothesis. In a jujitsu style move it could be taken up and used by GAVI and potentially the WHO to promote administering medication by patch. No doubt it would make the tech mogul even more wealthy and powerful as I am sure he owns the patents for that delivery system. On the one hand it would be financially advantageous to you to capitalize on having such a supporter. But it would ultimately lead us farther down the dystopian path. I am quite sure your intentions are good. I wonder if you have thought of this potential pitfall?

Expand full comment
author

Hi,

I don't care about this pitfall.

My role isn't to stop all vaccines.

If WHO, GAVI and all these shameful organizations start using patches and stop harming billions of people, I will be very happy. Job done.

What's more important stopping the lie or stopping the harm?

First and foremost, we need to stop harming people and kids.

Saving pain, harm, the suffering of billions of people is my priority. Let them use patches if they are safe. My priority isn't stopping the vaccine Ponzi, even if I believe it should be stopped and have been vocal and instrumental in explaining why.

The probability of stopping vaccination is almost zero today, however pointing the provax camp that their own delivery protocol isn't compliant can be implemented very quickly, and the damage stopped.

I am taking flack for this from many readers today. And I have trouble keeping my cool bc are we the camp protecting the kids and our loved ones? Or are we the cam protecting the "Vaccines-are-all-evil" religion?

Today too many are more focused on ego fights than on stopping this on-going disaster from happening. I am visualizing hundreds of millions of kids harmed every year. I have my priorities in order.

I will ignore the financial suggestion (obviously unfounded!) which is quite low;. I have worked pro bono for 4 years, have sabotaged my network...and am in dire straights because of it am...now I am wicked.

With so much hatred and filfth thrown at me, I might eventually...but for now I'll stick to trying to save the kids.

Expand full comment

Fair enough. No ill feelings directed at you on my part. Fundamentalism of any sort will be society’s collective downfall for sure. I have just seen in the past few years how good intentions can get co-opted by those with an agenda for power and control to twist their proponents’ intentions. I have seen this happen for many years in the name of international aid. As you say, you have chosen your battle and are fighting it admirably. I guess anything that gets people to pause for a minute and question an otherwise accepted narrative is a good start.

At the behest of the demand by a sibling who has POA for my mother I took her for a booster recently, thinking that at least if I was present I could request that the needle be aspirated. I asked and the nurse said she wasn’t trained to do that but could check if the lead pharmacist was willing to give the injection but that I’d have to wait for awhile. I didn’t want to extend the ordeal for my mother and was horrified by how far in the nurse plunged the needle into my frail mother’s arm. Crazy that there is no training for these injectors into this basic safety protocol.

Expand full comment
author
Nov 26, 2023·edited Nov 26, 2023Author

And aspiration doesn't protect much...

I hope you asked for a very very slow injection.

I am sorry to hear your mom is under POA.

Have you contemplated HBOT with her doctor?

Expand full comment

Marc I reviewed your bolus theory. Maybe I am misunderstanding the lengthy linked article at the bottom of the above presentation. As an layman, this is my understanding of it goes like this:

> A covid mRNA Injection that penetrates the blood vessel will cause inestimable harm both immediate and long-term.

Is that correct?

My thoughts based on what I know of these genetic witches brew is that the entire bate and switch of real RNA to synthetic RNA is a huge problem in that it does not degrade like normal God-authorized RNA but continues on in its relentless task of duplication and potentially transcribing into the patients DNA. Opening this door is something man never should have done. It is in a sense playing the role of God and is a Demonic construction. We are left with the thesis that the designers of this genetic therapeutic either failed to understand the doors that they were opening (being totally negligent); or they designed a product with intent to kill.

Expand full comment
author

No, the problem is not specific to mRNA.

MMR, HPV...

The bolus theory is the implications of an accidental IV injection.

at a concentration taht is 270,000 times greater.

Expand full comment

sorry, I am not following the notion of "accidental"... but will need to reread it slower.

Expand full comment
author
Nov 26, 2023·edited Nov 26, 2023Author

When a doctor or a nurse inserts a needle into a muscle, the needle will inevitably puncture blood vessel, some bigger than other.

There's a huge pressure difference between the vaccine at the exit of the needle and the blood stream. So if the punctured vessel is close enough, a part of the dose will go directly into the bloodstream. Read my article from Sept 2022.

So doctors think they inject in the muscle tissue and that the vaccine is slowly infused via the lymph node, when it's partly injected directed into teh vascular system.

Expand full comment
Nov 26, 2023Liked by Marc Girardot

Marc, great post. The primary problem is that the average person is brainwashed from an early age to believe that that these injections can't be anything but safe and effective. It is like talking to someone who firmly believes in all the religiosity that they were raised with. They just won't believe that they could have been bamboozled.

I told a friend who has been a nurse all of her life about your bolus theory and she said she always aspirated and almost never saw any blood. She hasn't read your work just heard my lame description. She is completely against the shots and retired so she could remain clean.

thanks again for all your work.

Expand full comment

Yes, excellent argument. How did pharma get such preferential liability protections? I can only surmise that they bought it, or should I say they bought the politicians who make the laws. But don't all industries buy off politicians? Was it the false belief that vaccines are essential to maintaining a healthy population?

Expand full comment
Nov 26, 2023Liked by Marc Girardot

Hi CC,

USA Vaccine Manufacturers were going out of business in the mid-1980s because their harmful child vaccines had caused so much death, Injuries to infants, children so President Reagan was forced by big Pharma to sign the insane 1986 childhood vaccine exemption which allowed them unlimited profits from harmful childhood vaccines.

Then any lawsuits from injuries, deaths were filed against the usa government vaccine court resulting in billions of dollars for Settlements.

Then see Katherine Watt's Bailiwicknews.substack.com substack in which she outlines the sad timeline of how the 2004 PrEP act gave blanket bullet proof immunity to all vaccines.

Meanwhile, more info here:

https://open.substack.com/pub/amidwesterndoctor/p/why-does-the-government-cover-up

Expand full comment

Thanks for the links. It is an insane law, isn't it? Rather than demand a safe product (which, by the way is impossible since all vaccines are inherently unsafe and ineffective), or demand that they just stop making the vaccines, they just provided liability protections that the taxpayer now must cover when someone does manage to run the almost impossible gauntlet of the vaccine court. The covid jab is an even harder hurdle to jump. Almost no one gets restitution from that court. Here's a run-down of claims and compensation rulings: https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data 12,358 claims made, 1621 decisions rendered, claims compensated to date 8.

Expand full comment

Yes, just a few claims have received any compensation (many less than $2k) for death and injury from the covid injections because the media has been bought and cannot honestly report. So the public dialog is tightly controlled as if we are now living in a totalitarian government and the justice system is heavily influenced as well. The public has lost the right to speak freely and Scientists, physicians and others who speak out against this narrative are heavily censored, discredited and deplatformed. Re-education camps which are really prisons and concentration camps will be next for those dissidents.

Expand full comment
Nov 26, 2023Liked by Marc Girardot

Thank you for this. Toby Roger’s wrote a paper about the economic burden the U.S. is about to face as autistic kids are starting to age out of the school system - and what it will cost to support them. Sobering stuff. And as you mention, ASD is only one of the issues. Obesity, cancer, etc etc. People need to wake up fast.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26183723/

Expand full comment
author
Nov 26, 2023·edited Nov 26, 2023Author

Elizabeth,

The prediction I have is crazy, bc autism is just one piece: cancer, AD, PD, ALS, MS, endocrine disorders, etc...we are running to the abyss. Society as we know it will collapse as the social contract is broken, and the cost to family will be impossible.

Self-preservation instincts need to kick back in. And today I am seeing our camp attack me, bc I want to stop the harm now, and many are focused on stopping vaccines. But that might take 30 years, and by then the harm will be colossal. We need to fight what's causing the harm, and that's the injection malpractice. After all, if the vaccine is harmless who cares if it doesn't work. I wan to save kids tomorrow not in 30 years.

Expand full comment
Nov 26, 2023Liked by Marc Girardot

I agree completely and can’t imagine how frustrating it must be to put so much work into your theory just to have “our” side attack you without bothering to take the time to really understand your point.

Expand full comment
Nov 26, 2023Liked by Marc Girardot

I'm a Civil Engineer. I have to sign and stamp my plans and take on the liability of my design, I don't get to hide the data of my reports for 75 years--no transparency, no liability, no shots.

Expand full comment