It's Not the Free-Floating Spike Causing Adverse Effects!
Vaccine Safety Myth - Data show that the spike is absent after jab2, how could it be the cause of the damage?
Every year, a poetic season opens with summer nights illuminated by thousands of ephemeral fairy-like traces: Meteorites finishing their endless journey hitting Earth’s atmosphere.
The spectacle is enchanting and soothing for elderly and children alike. One of Nature’s many wonders.
Fortunately, these travelling meteorites are small. As the rocks penetrate our stratosphere at incredible speed, they generally burn and - almost magically - vanish into thin air. An innocuous display of natural fireworks: free pyrotechnics for all to admire.
Occasionally, one makes it through, offering astronomers a mysterious sample of the universe. One such rocks was so big it eliminated dinosaurs from the planet, and nearly annihilated all form of life. Size and dynamics matter.
What is true for the infinitely big remains true for the infinitely small. The world of vaccine biology and pharmacokinetics is also run by these rules…
Many healthcare professionals who honour me with their readership shared their personal stories stating they rarely - if ever - had “hit blood” when using the aspiration technique. And I have every reason to believe they are saying the truth.
However, the study by Pr. Hoiby, comparing Norway and Denmark, shows a marked difference with 60% less adverse effects in Denmark when applying aspiration.
A variety of possibilities exist: they were better trained then some and inject better, or the aspiration technique isn’t actually foolproof - i.e. one can still inject intravenously even though one has checked…
My last article “Vaccine Russian Roulette : Why some might be just fine and some not...” argued that Covid vaccines could be particularly dangerous - in the short and medium term - under very specific conditions.
Contrary to many, my investigation didn’t point to the famous spike protein, but to a combination of factors:
the inevitable destruction of transfected cells by T-cells and…
the probable inadvertent intravenous injection of the vaccine and its immediate consequences.
Herein, I confirm last week’s statement with further proofs and analysis.
For over a year, I have been stating that vaccination is never a trivial procedure, it’s a medical intervention.
Even a seemingly insignificant procedure like injection can be a weak spot, and kill or maim millions…
Despite the denial of many that the anti-Covid vaccines can be dangerous, it’s been evident from the start. It is now overwhelming.
If the incidents :
at the Australian Open (Bushfire smoke, really?),
with Rafael Nadal ,
or yesterday at the Miami Open
…seem odd, if not disquieting. They will inevitably be dispelled as anecdotal, just like two professional cyclists who died this past fortnight, and all the professional soccer players and athletes who have died on the field this past year.
The pharmacovigilance data has been very clear from the start, and still is.
Free-Floating Spikes cannot be the root cause of Adverse Effects
Dr. Peter McCullough brought to my attention a recent study where a Harvard Medical School team used a very precise technology to measure spike protein post injection 1 and 2 of the Moderna Covid vaccine.
In my opinion, this landmark study settles the debate on the danger of the Spike protein. Here is the most important table: the spike concentration post injection in 13 healthcare workers…
Adapted from “Circulating Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients” by Alana Ogata et al
click on chart to access study
The two most striking elements of this table are:
After the first injection: the peak concentration of spike protein is on average at 62 pg/mL (picograms) on day 5, and very rapidly plummets. In other words, trusting one’s immune system once again is proven to be the right approach. There is no obscene amount of spike proteins contrary to what some of us had contemplated. As I asserted in my previous article, we can trust our immune to do the work of producing rapidly T-cells and antibodies to rid the body of wandering spike proteins: after day 9, there is no trace of spike.
After the second injection: there’s hardly - if any - trace of spike. The most likely reason is that memory T-cells came into action very quickly, and didn’t leave enough time for significant spike production. This is a key finding which makes a lot of sense: Spike protein cannot be the root cause of myocarditis if it’s hardly produced post jab2. Indeed, myocarditis often occurs at the 2nd injection. The spike protein cannot be the reason for myocarditis and any adverse event occurring post injection 2, 3 and 4…because T-cells won’t let transfected cell produce spike.
Following the data, Team Reality scientists need to acknowledge that the root cause of the massive amount of vaccine adverse events we have witnessed cannot originate in the utilisation of the spike as antigen:
If the spike is missing, it can’t be the cause for all the damage.
Concentrated T-cells Hits
As the authors of the article quoted above suggest, activated T-cells destroy cells penetrated by the Moderna vaccine nanoparticles. Evidently, it would be the same for Pfizer, Jenssen, AstraZeneca or even Sinovac’s attenuated viruses.
T-cells are vaccine agnostic: As soon as they are aware of an “infected cell”, rapid multiplication occurs and massive attack rid the body of these cells. This is the reason, the Novavax and the Medicago vaccines are likely less dangerous, at least on those grounds1.
That’s when my earlier shooting star analogy comes into play. We know occasionally meteorites make it to the ground. Sometimes piercing through a tiled roof, or splashing into a field (see the rice field below). Rarely making much damage.
This is likely what occurs when the vaccine is well injected into the muscle, as it trickles slowly into the blood, the muscle acts as an IntraVenous saline bag, progressively diffusing throughout the body the vaccine nanoparticles.
Based on the mouse distribution study , I delved further to try and compare the peak concentration levels of a regular intramuscular injection and inadvertent intravenous injection.
With Pfizer, I estimated the maximum transfection potential of 30 lipid nanoparticles per sq.mm. Hypothesising a worse case scenario of 10% transfection rate, the estimated endothelial damage would be likely less than 0.4%.
Following a full intravenous injection, the risk to the endothelial surfaces are much higher depending on how far from the injection point the transfection occurs.
Immediately after injection is when the concentration is highest with a transfection coverage of 4.2 lipid nanoparticle per endothelial cell. In other words, there is a possibility of transfecting more than 100% of the endothelial surface, hitting smooth muscle via interstitial penetration. If the PEG coating2 isn’t effective at that moment, this is likely the precise instant when the most damage can occur in the right ventricle, the pulmonary artery and the lungs.
If the PEG coating protects endothelial cells from transfection in the first few instant, it is likely to wear off by passing through the 100 kilometers of lung capillaries…
In the left ventricle and in the aorta where blood pressure is the highest, there is also the risk of high transfection. That would explain the damage found by Pr. Burkhardt with collapsed aorta and damaged arteries.
Then depending on PEG disappearance and on relative concentration pockets, the LNP-filled blood will be directed to the heart coronaries, the liver, the spleen, the intestines, the brain, the nerves…where it will have the potential to wreak havoc.
These are rough estimates, and pharmacodynamics simulation undertaken by fluid dynamics experts would demonstrate with more precision what I believe is happening. But this is very telling as to where the risks lie, and why inadvertent intravenous injections are the most probable cause for all the adverse effects we have been seeing.
Whether we are a fierce adversary of these Covid vaccines, or a strong advocate, there should be a common ground: the safe delivery of any injection to our loved ones.
It seems the “aspiration technique” is far from fool-proof. Denmark still has had many adverse effects. It is imperative that Health Authorities throughout the globe, ban cell-penetrating vaccine technologies as they all carry that risk, and focus on more effective and less intrusive vaccine technologies that will preserve our health, rather than put it at risk.
We must all unite in demanding that vaccine technologies, our families and friends are injected with, do not carry the risk of endothelial transfection.
They could have their own dangers (adjuvants…I haven’t looked into it), but as they are not transfecting cells, and had other organism produce the spike-like antigen, these vaccine should not have that specific safety problem.