32 Comments

I think the most disgusting thing about this debate is the sheer stupidity of the people and their arguments against it. You know like I wrote here https://rexleereid.com/f/do-mmrmultiple-vaccines-at-once-lead-to-autoimmune-diseases

I believe actual know two things can be true at once. You can have bad batches as has been shown, you can be a total moron or Mengele and give multiple vaxs at the same time and have a bad outcome. Just from that even without a Bolus and with it is only magnified.

But how fing stupid or brainwashed do you have to be deny the probability of a Bolus when you have Tren document and aspiration is meant to prevent just that. Honestly, it is no wonder the west is imploding. And it is centered around the more "education" you have the dumber you become. Just look at the vote total in the US. The more "education" you have the more you are detached from reality.

Expand full comment

I agree. Add to all this that there are many different techniques used by injectionists, and they would all have varying effects on the bolus theory outcome. Eg, were you plunging the plunger while inserting the needle? How much did the depth waver while the payload was delivered? it all makes sense....

Expand full comment

Absolutely;

Expand full comment

They did a really good job of this

Why Don’t They Discourage Bad Dietary Choices and Stop Vaccinating?

Consider the impacts on the economy of not reducing the life spans of humans.

Let’s say 30% of the population of a country lived beyond 90 years. Pension plans would implode as there would not be enough money to cover redemptions. For those on public pensions, we could raise taxes to ensure pensioners get paid, but that would mean less money for schools, roads and other infrastructure. Government services would need to be dramatically scaled back resulting in huge job losses.

All of these elderly people would essentially be ‘useless eaters’ sapping the economic strength of the country to provide them with medical care and free bus passes, while they produce and contribute nothing.

Why did they ramp up the vaccine schedule in the 80’s? I would suggest that they did this because population (which grows exponentially) was about to get out of control so they needed to take action. What would our overall population be if not for the vaccine push and the dramatic increase in the availability of processed foods in recent decades?

You are Expendable

At the end of the day all they care about is having enough circus and barnyard animals to operate the farm. They could care less about you or your health - you are EXPENDABLE.

They most certainly do not want one third of the population living to 90+ Japan and China are prime examples of what happens when a country is top heavy on elderly citizens. Too few young people to support the elderly.

Without these wise decisions by the Men Who Run the World to deploy strategies to cull the herd, the global economy would have collapsed years ago under the dead weight of too many geriatrics.

https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/which-option-do-you-prefer

Option 1: introduce a Culling Lottery. When you reach 70 years of age, provided you are relatively healthy, you receive a lottery ticket. One of out ten is a winner. The losers are put down.

Option 2: introduce mass vaccination, make sugar ubiquitous in food products, and encourage the consumption of processed foods ensuring that most people do not live much past 70.

Why do we not want a population that is top heavy with elderly citizens?

This would be a disaster because a high proportion of our limited resources would need to be allocated to supporting the elderly, and they contribute nothing.

Resources that could be used to operate good schools, hospitals, infrastructure and so on, would instead go to medical care, free bus passes, old age homes, pensions and other support for the huge army of geriatrics.

The Men Who Run the World were forced to make a decision.

They went with Option 2.

https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/vaccines-are-population-control

Expand full comment

Hi Marc

One Pfizer Jab was applied as a Bolus to Mice in 2021 and the same Lot later was given to Humans causing Death and Injury

https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/bolus-in-the-jugular-bodyhack-via

Expand full comment

Let's have a video call, Geoff...

Toxicity is always related to dose..that's true with neurotoxins or with mRNA.

Expand full comment

My old computer can't be updated for most video programs. I can do chats on X.

Endotoxin Cytokine Storm poisoning is autocatalytic, breaking the dose rule.

Expand full comment

Another example of a toxin violating classic dose response is chronic low-level microwave radiation exposure. A lower field strength is sometimes more harmful than a stronger one. This is known as the "window effect."

Expand full comment

Hi Marc,

I too, was hoping for an easy way to understand this Bolus situation- lotsa searches on Chatbots this morning primarily deciphering some terms in this link that Timothy Winey provided. Lets see if I have this right: a Bolus, which is a dose given intramuscular, goes beyond the capillaries and can hit blood vessels (like IV) causing them to tear/leak thus entering the cardio system and playing havoc with the chemicals in the bolus? thanks for all you do Marc !

https://gsconlinepress.com/journals/gscarr/content/are-mrna-vaccines-inducing-sanarelli-shwartzman-phenomenon

This link was about SSP- don't believe it fits anything to do with your findings BUT I was struck by my latest interest Gluten & Lectins which was mentioned in this SSP article.

Expand full comment

Hi JT,

Thank you for your kinf words.

Yes, the SSP is close to my theory in terms of cancer. I am just fortunate to have more years of research to support my theory. They were true pioneers.

My theory is easy to understand. Just need to be read.

I am sorry I had to oust Winey. He openly was dishonest and ill-intended and had not read my work. I worked very hard and have sacrificed my family, my life and my finances to help society, so I won't take s...t from disrespecting, dishonest trolls.

read my book, you'll get the whole picture.

All the best,

Expand full comment

A big question, why did the CDC originally specify no syringe aspiration with the mRNA gene therapy jabs? Further after it was conclusive that an intravenous injection of mRNA gene therapy can kill and permanently injure, the guidelines on injection procedure were revised are still SILENT on performing an aspiration check to avoid intravenous injection. Why? Staggering.

Expand full comment

Aspiration wouldn't have changed much, it gives a false sense of security if all the injections go in part IV.

Expand full comment

You are absolutely right, be glad for the critics. There are many books I have read because of negative critics, when I get the sense that the author of the critique is just perpetrating a personal attack on an author, and I should read the original.

Expand full comment

The critics are mostly ad hominems...but when they do try, as Likkileaks here, it always confirms and strengthens the Bolus Theory.

Expand full comment

Marc, I assume intravenous illegal drug users are at an even greater danger considering what’s is known/unknown injected and most not trained. Could this also be tied to the increase in fatalities we are seeing in the US?

Expand full comment

I have zero experience in that.

But one of my readers mentioned that, indeed it could also be relevant , in that area where they inject directly into the vein.

Expand full comment

Marc , I had never knew of the Bolus theory until your presentation here. I knew vaxxes were dangerous for years now and even moreso with this very deadly mRNA Vax bio weapon. They DO want us chronically sick or dead.

I'm trying desperately to convince all my grown kids NOT to Vax their babies like the healthy Amish don't, but for the reasons that you list in this superbly written substack essay and more.

I just added The Needles Secret to my Amazon cart.

Keep up your fine work sir!

Godspede!

Expand full comment

Thank you. It's been an arduous journey. Hopefully, soon the message gets through soon because sacrificing my family to the common good has limits.

Expand full comment

I am honestly surprised that the fact that many injections go IV is disputed at all. I remember getting a shot once for something where the syringe filled up with blood before my eyes.

I never realized the ramifications of the contents in a syringe ending up in the blood vessels until I read your book, I would have liked to think that the medical profession, both alternative and otherwise would have been at least somewhat clued into this. Even if they’re not, now that you’ve brought it to their attention, the rest of the world would appreciate a robust discussion about what you are positing instead of ignoring you or insulting you.

What is most disturbing at all is that some of the alternative medical sources that have been correctly pointing out the dangers of a lot of medical interventions for years now plugging their ears and screaming out loud like a three year-old instead of paying serious attention to what you’re proposing.

What the hell happened to science? Why on earth are we unable to discuss anything whatsoever with anyone who disagrees with or has it different opinion of something that we believe to be true? It seems like the philosophers and medical professionals have now become the most close minded members of society and to , find at least a trace of legitimate open minded inquiry, we’ve got to go to the taxi, drivers and carpenters and nail salons

Expand full comment

I agree - it’s been disappointing to see so many in “the movement” disparage Marc’s theory reactively. I had the same reflex when I first heard about it, but the more I sat with it the more I could see its merits. If we really believe in rigorous scientific debate and study, we should be willing to consider alternative explanations, even if they make us uncomfortable. I hope the translations he’s working on help spread the word and get more traction.

@marc - If you were to design a study to prove or disprove your theory, what would it look like? Have you written about this already? Merci

Expand full comment

Hi Elizabeth,

Thanks for your comment.

I hope you are well.

Several studies have tested IV injections already and validated it.

Li et al actually hints that all IM injections go IV as at he 2nd shot the IM injections are started to be more like the IV injections. Nicolai et al in Munich also proved my theory with the Astra Zeneca vaccine.

Some earlier studies with other vaccines had also tested and validated it.

Most pharmacodynamics studies prove the same thing as above.

The only thing that deserves testing is my evasion-by-replication hypothesis for cancer.

Expand full comment

I am an outsider. SImple as that.

Expand full comment

It's colloquially known as "not invented here syndrome."

Expand full comment

With all the fraud and corruption that makes big pharma the evil empire that it is, this theory seems relatively plausible. As usual, doctors are totally clueless about the drugs, tests and procedures they use to keep us sick and ailing.

Expand full comment

Why this platform is being tried for other purposes seems insane to me. Who can stop this madness and how are we to know what products are using this? I hope a new administration can make a list of shots not to take.

Expand full comment

How does the Interstitium play into this? Could this be the delivery vehicle?https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/meet-your-interstitium-a-newfound-organ/

Expand full comment

The interstitium is the liquid thta is chased away by the vaccine dose. It puts pressure on the vaccine dose whixh will continue to leak cut blood vessels, until there's zeor pressure differential between the 2.

Expand full comment

Does your theory apply to any injection? Diabetic shots, testosterone, IVs of saline or other therapeutics?

Expand full comment

Yes, but with varying degrees of severity and harm. Most vaccines are cytotoxic in nature, so they are mofe dangerous.

Expand full comment

Once Jikky starts acting nasty towards you, it means you are over the target. I suppose his cadre of silly trolls joined in as well. We had them on a Twitter space (they had to show up because we challenged them to after weeks of X toxicity mainly consisting of slinging childish memes and patting each other on the back - or maybe somewhere else). At least one was inebriated, another was clearly batsh*t crazy. Jikky didn't show up (shocker). I assume you do know who he is, as he has been outed many times. But he is likely a "they", meaning a group of people.

Expand full comment

Not really interested in Jikki and co. Am actually happy he challenged my work.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Nov 6
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Will, I appreciate your comments, but this is not the place.

Please refrain from being discordial to my readers or to me, Geoff being one of them.

I don't accept rude words or ad hominems on my Substack. Please stop using these words. Send me personal notes if you need to. I got your message about what you call the Dark Force which is essentially that people don't want to see the truth, and we outsiders see it easily. Being vocal and aggressive isn't a good strategy for you Will.

Again, it's not limited to Tcells; everybody gets Tcell attacks; it's the bolus problem that concentrates and changes the dose toxicity. You can get the same with a protein vaccine, steroids or even pollen BTW.

PS: will erase all the message that contain improper language. This is not the way I see us solving the issue.

Expand full comment