As I’ve previously stated….I believe Marc’s Bolus hypothesis is sound and can explain a lot of adverse events, including deaths. But, I don’t believe the Bolus hypothesis answers all of the fallout from the mRNA vaccines. So my intent was not to poison the well, but instead begin to challenge it as the all encompassing answer.
Don't worry you are not the only one stating that. :-)
Right now many people suggest mechanisms of harms but they are based on a pile of assumptions. So I am very comfortable with my theory which has almost zero assumption (except the leak of immature hematopoietic cells from the bone marrow causing immune depression).
My Bolus theory doesn't address longer term issues tied to homologies that could trigger autoimmune disorders. The only AE type that is not explained - as of today - is blood cancer. May be they are simply cancer acceleration which the Bolus Theory explains. To my knowledge the rest falls into my 4 categories.
It’s great that you’ve worked through the mechanisms to eliminate assumptions which makes for comfortable explanations. Aside from the blood cancers, would you consider the long white fibrous clots (being found by numerous embalmers) to be an explainable phenomenon within the Bolus theory?
Sorry if this is out of context but worth passing on to your group as well as Mike Yeadon.
This may be the huge confounding factor (along with your Bolus hypothesis) as the invisible elephant in the room interacting with graphene, aluminum etc to bring about AEs;
Respectfully, it isn't an elephant in the room. If graphene and aluminium were the problem. Every body would have problem, and the problem would be systemic. Not everybody has problem (Thankfully!!) and the AEs are not systemic. There's no cytokine storm in the current AEs.
In mutual respect, I think your reply is a bit simplistic in its dismissal of EMRs affecting graphene which I turn affects cell metabolism.
EMRs/EMFs can be manipulated in innumerable ways, shapes and forms to affect conductive particles.
Regardless of whether EMRs/EMFs are being intentionally incorporated into an experimental eugenics program, it would defy logic to dismiss research demonstrating their growing effects on human biology.
You may be right. But I am not seeing any of the clinical signs that substantiate any of it. The same rationale that I expressed about the spike works for Graphene.
Why not everybody dying? Why no necrosis at the point of injection? Why localised damage? Why no damage in the tissue? Why not systemic damage as the graphene would inevitably be systemic? Why only the endothelium?
Either you believe the human body is a marvellous machine or you don't. I believe it's smarter than any technology we throw at it. If the quantities of graphene were significant enough and would stay in the body I would think this is credible. But the quantities of graphene has to be very small, and a huge part of it has to be shedded away in the feces. Thinking it all goes to the cells is a physical impossibility the ratio of surface/volume has got to be ridiculously small. And the probabilities of them entering cells are very small versus taking the exit doors, shedding them out.
I believe all these folks on graphene are playing the game of scaring people to get research funding or to get YouTube dollars. They are vultures telling stories. This is entertainment not science, just like Climate Change, IMHO. I am not into scaring people. May be I am wrong. I am only human, mon ami. But I only work on tangible verifiable data.
Mark, all very good question. And I can respond to some of them at least in part.
As you said, and I agree wholeheartedly that the human body was marvelously designed with powerful, albeit not fully understood immune system.
And, though some might say that EMRs’ effects on cellular biology enter somewhat into woo woo science, I’d characterize it more as emerging or frontier science. Yet virology itself is somewhat comparable in that respect as there are vacuums left in today’s explanation of SARS Cov-2 and (its) isolation, apparent replication and symptomatic manifestations.
And, as far as companies, teams, organizations and individuals seeking research funding for all things Covid, I’d say that there’s little comparison as to the fear based greed in that massive camp than from the EMF researchers.
I won’t go into a great detailed response to tour excellent questions but if you were to take the time to digest the video linked in my previous post, you could begin to visualize the possibilities of EMF (primarily microwave) involvement in weaponizing the vaccines…. which could be done through simple or complex pulsed frequency and amplitude modulations into random or organized environments….. especially considering that graphene is both highly conductive and magnetic which through frequency tuning could be amalgamated into organs or regions of the body. IMHO, this grand experiment involves multiple medium inputs.
Perhaps EMRs don’t interest you but since you have a voice in the conversation, I’m simply trying to interject a broader scope for consideration and discussion.
Don't worry my lovely wife has been telling me about it for 2,5 years. Trust me.
I can imagine very high power EMR devices to harm, but they don't need graphene for that, water is fine or iron. I just don't believe the graphene would stay in the body, the laws of physics and probability show most of it would be shedded, and cells don't let enter things 10nm object like that. Many experiments are done at crazy concentrations, and aren't relevant.
Time will tell nothing we can do about it now. Think TV and media is a much more effective way to control people.
Great information, although there are already reports of the nanoparticles across multiple barriers even injected intra-muscularly that didn't hit a vein. For example the mammary gland which has tight junctions of cells forming the blood-milk barrier that filters the substances, yet there are still mRNA concentration found in breast milk in the recent study.
Also, I remember in your previous post you stated that there are about 10 billion lipid nanoparticles in Pfizer and 50 billions in Moderna. However, I discovered this paper published by FDA: https://www.fda.gov/media/151707/download At the bottom of page 19 the paper gives the volume of the lipid ingredients, if you add up the numbers, there is a total of 570ug lipids in one single injection. I do not know the correct weight of a single lipid nanoparticle, but based on its diameter 60-100nm and many of the calculations I have done myself, even the smallest number is something trillionth instead of just billionth. So can you please double check if your previous statement and calculation of there being just billions LNP is correct?
Hi Damian, if the mRNA is passing the barrier, it's likely because it's been made leaky by immune attacks. The size is such that there's no way it can pass.
Some folks have showed Spike pass which is much smaller the BBB (but with obscene concentrations), but still I would be surprised it would pass the milk-blood barrier without some kind of damage. But I have been wrong before.
I read that they likely passed through by extracellular vesicles(like exosomes and liposomes) secreted from the cells that have uptake the LNP. The cells in our body constantly exchange materials with each other through extracellular vesicles all the time, a cell can package any materials into its extracellular vesicles, then release them to be delivered into neighboring cells. Those vesicles can be as small as 25~30nm so they can easily pass through any barriers in tissues without any damage or breakage at all. This has been a blind spot in regarding the distribution of the vaccine genes around the body since the beginning.
And the 570ug lipid volume in the fda paper is also given by the manufacturer of Pfizer. So either their data contradicts to themselves or the calculations are more complex then.
I appreciate your work and have come to accept that your bolus hypothesis is a likely cause for many of the adverse effects of the mRNA injections, especially those cases involving short term manifestations, including death.
As time and information have converged, I’m increasingly convinced that another co-factor is causing AEs, especially those occurring weeks (at the earliest) and months or longer for the most resilient.
I understand that the basic mechanisms are still being worked in the mosaic of Covid injections, but it at well be worth evaluating these mechanisms in light of additional data parameters, including rollout of 5G user exposure.
It’s been demonstrated that EMFs are affecting cellular biology in plants and animals. And, it’s also a given that EMFs interact with nonbiological particles such as graphene and aluminum, both increasingly found in the mRNA vial samples and in human tissue.
Though funding for EMFs interaction with (these particles) and their effect on human biology is mostly limited to weapons programs, it may be worth analyzing data which incorporates proximity, rollout (and amplitude if available) of 4G/5G.
Perhaps this adds an intolerable level of complexity to the equation, but it may be worth getting input from knowledgeable engineers and scientists in this field in order to ascertain whether key data exists to begin adding in a partitioned analysis.
No one else has been adding this to their discussions, which I view as an information vacuum. Generating some preliminary data analysis may stimulate greater concentrations of valuable input. (...or not?)
Florida Surgeon General states 84% young healthy males will suffer Cardiac complications following Covid Vax. LIABILITY for vax makers would stop this carnage! Currently it's their stolen Licence to kill - emanating from a 1976 TEMPORARY cessation of LIABILITY for an equally useless vaccine for Swine Flu, After 50+ US civilians died POST-VAX the Experiment was abandoned - deemed as being "TOO DANGEROUS"! Now the VAX-related deaths are in the millions but still they keep jabbing. My theory is that it's not for Covid - It's 'De-population. Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed after joining the dots!
Most if not all of those who were "affected by Covid" (in 2020 and down the line) were not in fact "affected by Covid" in any meaningful way.
People in nursing homes and hospitals were being killed directly through policies and medical protocols.
I attend weekly meetings which are 3-4 hours in length which go into excruciating detail on the hospital protocols. There are usually around 70-90 attendees. The majority of those in the meetings have had a loved one killed inside the hospital directly due to Covid protocols.
There are many thousand of these stories that are being collected. All of these stories have the same basic template.
They describe what happened inside those hospitals in the most comprehensive way imaginable. Many of these people are in the process of litigation or moving in that direction. It is impossible to convey the brutality of what was happening in these hospitals. You have to hear the stories to understand and believe it.
Similar or worse was happening in nursing homes.
I believe it is a very difficult task to prove that there is even a single Covid death for any individual regardless of age or level of health.
There is a product with LNPs already approved an on the market. But instead on mRNAs it has much smaller siRNA (about 200 nucleotides) and is called Onpattro (patisaran). It is given as an iv infusion over 80 minutes every 3 weeks for hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis in adults. It is also required to premedicate prior to the infusion to avoid infusion related reactions which can be significant. https://www.onpattrohcp.com/files/pdfs/ONPATTRO-Dosing-and-Preparation-Guide.pdf
Overall, mainly the lipid part of the LNP is taken up and broken down in liver cells, endothelial cells and phagocytic cells. Organs/tissues with cells rich in LDL-like and related scavenger receptors and/or where a fenestrated endothelium exists are also capable of taking up the LNP (e.g., lymph nodes, spleen, bone marrow vessels, and adrenal gland)
Might be useful to review and find commonalities with the vaccine LNPs.
I think it might help if some more colloquial term was used rather than "bolus". The idea that the injection should be slow seems very sensible, but "bolus" is not part of my vocabulary as a layperson. Of course, if the "bolus" idea gains popularity then people will know the word.
I have always known "bolus" as a clump, the main example being a blob of chewed-up food in one's mouth or throat, i.e. something like what James hastily expresses below when referring to ruminants. But, prompted by Bob's comment, I consulted the AHD and note that it does include a detailed 2nd definition as a technical medical term:
How about a “swarming bolus”? I’m rooting for #teambolus myself as it’s emblematic of a bullet for me whereas swarm seems too diffuse. And I absolutely know you have bigger fish to fry versus this level of parsing. TY for all you do! 💪🙏🏻🔥🧠
Thanks for your excellent work! However, the presentation on the Rumble platform detracts from the seriousness of the issue, with the LOUD ADS for GOLD and MAGA and other issues. This will turn off many who might be swayed by your argument.
English is my second language. I am not a biologist.
So if I don't use their language I get even more clobbered!
On the Spike and my credibility.
The 60 day Spike was actually a reinfection...and most studies have been trying to show some spike very far out to prove the vaccine are effective long...It's a fraud, or at least a manipulation. They never tell the quantities of Spike which are abysmally small and thus irrelevant in terms of toxicology. Even on picture they show traces...what do we care for traces 5 months out? Toxicity is about quantity. I focus on what relevant. I am not here to scare people on the contrary.
Moreover, on Spike toxicity most studies in-vitro use very high concentrations much greater than anything seen in-vivo (like 10,000x). I stick to science and I prefer sticking to fundamental laws of Science rather than flaky study and house-of-cards assumptions.
Bolus- A single dose of a drug or other substance given over a short period of time. It is usually given by infusion or injection into a blood vessel. It may also be given by mouth.
In radiology, a tissue-equivalent material placed on the surface of the body to minimize the effects of an irregularly shaped body surface. The dose at the skin surface tends to increase, minimizing the skin-sparing effect of megavoltage radiation.
IV bolus- when vitamins or medications are taken over a longer time period, typically one to 30 minutes in non-emergency situations. The IV fluid line is typically wide open, as opposed to a typical slower drip of a long-dosing standard IV.
That a hypothesis is the minority view does not make that argument invalid. That's the bandwagon fallacy- one of the classic logical fallacies.
Marc, kudos on your thinking & output, for the longest time, on the COVID fraud!
As you’ll probably know, I’ve recently adjusted my position on the virus. Specifically, just this virus. Set aside the wider existential question about viruses, as I don’t think it can be resolved unequivocally. For some reason, some people conflate their view that, since a given type of pathogen does exist, then THIS ONE must also exist. That’s just not logical.
There’s some convincing evidence AGAINST the narrative that says there’s a novel, lethal respiratory virus, SARS-CoV-2, which is circulating and - crucially - causing massive scale illnesses and deaths.
Have you had the chance to listen to the interview between Denis Rancourt & Jeremy Nell (of Jerm Warfare)?
Some (many?) will find implausible Rancourt’s inference, based on patterns in all-causes mortality data, in 50 states over 100 weeks, that there is no unequivocal evidence for & much evidence against the central narrative claim about a virus.
It is a shocking claim, granted.
I’m very interested in your take on Rancourt's findings. No rush.
The average age of a death by or with "Covid-19" is higher than life expectancy in all Western countries. No other figure even need be known to understand the "pandemic" (business model) is a fraud and a giant Ponzi scheme.
In the US the "Covid death" number is cooked/manipulated due to how the CDC does their accounting as well as many other factors- an audit of the CDC mortality numbers would illustrate the blatant fraud.
I have looked at the CDC's mortality database for ALL Covid coded deaths. You would have a hard time making a case that there is even a single Covid death in any age group regardless of level of health.
1) The first thing that must be addressed is "who were these people?" The average age of a "Covid death" was 78 in the US and 82 globally w/4 comorbidities on average. The largest bloc of these people were from nursing homes, assisted living, hospice etc. Where did the vast majority of initial "Covid deaths" occur? Here in the US (and everywhere in the West- Milan, Madrid, London, Brussels, Montreal, Toronto, etc.) most in "the first wave" who died from "Covid" already had one foot in the grave and their death was put on fast forward through medical protocols not an anomalous viral event.
What we had here in the US was a radical and mandatory shift in policies relating to hospitals, care homes and the overall social order. These new "policies" were mandated through various new and aberrant state "guidelines" which resulted in a concentrated death rate for a six week period in March/April. Take that out of the equation and there is no death rate to talk about. Put (or keep) these policies in place and we will have this happen every year.
There was mass medical murder in the hospitals and gross negligence (beyond the usual) in numeorus nursing homes in specific US cities that led to abandonment and medication alterations that turned these slow motion abattoirs into death houses. One of the remarkable things of note is that here in the US the "pandemic" was not widespread (which is supposed to be one of the defining features of a pandemic) but was in fact limited to very specific locations;
2) The faulty diagnosis of what is a "Covid death" did they die "with" or "from" Covid which is problematic for several reasons. In many cases an actual test was never done only a "presumed to be Covid" assessment was put forth. Add to this that when the tests were done PCR tests done with faulty specs (gene sequencing, cycle thresholds, annealing problems, faulty primers and so forth) were used. PCR can't diagnose anything in the first place and compounded with these problems they are useless and misleading.
99% of people falsely certified as having 'died from covid' actually died from their preexisting conditions being exacerbated by mass medical malpractice and 'public health' despotism, the other 1% simply died of old age.
From the CDC itself 7/16/21: "Of the 540,667 hospitalized coronavirus patients included in the study, 80,174 died during the observation period (March 2020 to March 2021).
A whopping 99.1% of the patients who died had at least one pre-existing condition, with just 740 having no prior condition on record. Most patients who died from COVID had multiple pre-existing conditions, with just 2.6% suffering from only one condition, compared to 32.3% who had two to five preexisting conditions, 39.1% who had six to ten, and 25.1% who have more than ten pre-existing conditions."
Translation: No one has 'died from covid' as "covid" is nothing more than a fraudulent PCR result plus a nebulous clinical re-branding of cold, "flu" and many other disease conditions.
3) No autopsies. Why were no autopsies done in the US? Why did they pass new mandates that halted all autopsies for "Covid deaths?" This went against decades long protocol. They also changed decades old protocol on how death certificates should be filed;
4) Home deaths is yet another way that figures were cooked. This was admitted point blank by Stephanie Buehle (NY Dept. of Health spokesperson) among others who stated that home deaths with no testing at all would be presumed "Covid deaths." This "guideline" was mandated through the NY Health Dept;
5) Covid death counts were forged- CDC instructed officials and altered guidelines, on March 24, 2020 in violation of Federal Law, to certify any death as "caused by" COVID if the decedent tested positive prior to passing or was suspected of having "C19", even if it wasn't the actual cause of death. Thus we have major misattribution. E.g., we have over 14,000 injury deaths listed in the "C19 death" total.
We also have unexplained declines in other common death categories because so many have been attributed to "C19." The unprecedented broad definition of "C19" death created huge fraud in "Covid death" counts;
6) Another way they inflated death counts was through hospital admissions and faulty PCR testing. This caused a huge spike in iatrogenic deaths caused by misattribution of "Covid" to incoming patients and the ensuing improper treatments applied e.g. ventilators, remdesivir and associated fentanyl dosages which killed thousands.
So for example if one came in with a coronary condition you would be given a "Covid test" no matter what- all admissions required this- and then if you died while in the hospital you could have been listed as a "Covid death." This happened frequently through the year.
The practice of PCR-testing hospital admissions who are asymptomatic for Covid using high Ct values undoubtedly caused deaths and unnecessary suffering.
This matters for several reasons. A pneumonia patient e.g. has a very good chance of surviving with correct support. However, if the patient tests ‘+’ for the non-existent pathogen an entirely different medical protocol goes into action and with this and there is little chance of survival.
The 'diagnosis' of "Covid" effectively permits dangerous protocols to be enacted that then increase the chance of mortality.
With regard to adoption of a new RT-PCR protocol for hospital admissions this also falsely manufactured death statistics for "Covid." Add to this how it was incentivized-$$$$$ while hospitals are under extreme financial duress. The US hospital system had it's worst financial quarter on record in the middle of a "pandemic." Administrators were under pressure to alleviate that financial pain and exploit all openings in the CARES Act.
None of this was accidental.
7) Lockdown impacts- too numerous to cite here.
In short whatever "excess deaths" which may have occurred anywhere can be attributed to people who didn't have to die but were KILLED due to the unnecessary use of ventilators, harsh toxic drugs, people dying prematurely due to lack of medical treatment, ill effects from the lockdowns and so on.
Are you speaking of the fact that the measures is what killed people and not the virus?
If that's the case, I completely agree. Jonathan Engler and Duncan Golicher came to the same conclusion in Italy and England. It was quite obvious for me too from the beginning because the virus had been around for some time and doctors were treating with the usual medicine, and when it hit the care homes, they changes the rules, came up with a crazy protocol (no treatment, ventilating everybody, no anti-inflammatory, not to mention death by injection...).
I find biologists to be very imaginative but rarely rigorous in logic. So you could be right or wrong on the virus. Raoult seems to be pretty convincing...
I have been interacting with Denis lately who likes my theory. But haven't had a chance to listen. Will listen and give you my take.
Marc, yes, it’s the observation that deliberately awful medical “treatment” & absent of appropriate treatments that are adequate explanations for the excess deaths. Denis Rancourt’s evidence is much more exhaustive than Jonathan Engler’s. Jonathan’s conclusions are that there’s no need to invoke a virus to explain what had happened.
I’d value your assessment of Denis’s analyses & conclusions, but my take is that his evidence actively excludes a novel viral cause (as well as, like Jonathan’s, showing adequate explanations for the excess deaths).
All is as well as can be expected!
Happy to record an update conversation perhaps end October?
As mentioned upstream I am currently involved with a group that meets through Zoom each Monday evening. The meetings are usually around 3 hours. These are very serious people who have had loved ones killed by Covid protocols and most are either already involved in or are currently pursuing legal action.
At these meetings there are usually 2 or 3 invited speakers (such as the lawyers representing families in Fresno or AJ DePriest et al) combined with individuals who go into the details of what happened to their family member in the hospital.
If you are ever interested in sitting in and hearing these stories I can arrange this. These are some of the most visceral and disturbing accounts I have heard throughout this Covid ordeal. It gives one a firm grasp on what happened in the hospitals.
No matter how you slice it those who have been injected with this crap are in deep trouble. That most have been serially injected is profoundly ominous.
What I'm seeing is that once young, healthy people who previous to the injections had high baseline health levels are now getting sick regularly.
One of the many manifestations of this I am seeing is a persistent cough. By persistent I mean this same niggling, sharp cough that they have had for months on end. I call it the human version of "kennel cough."
I, the only unjabbed RN in my department, sat silently and and listened to two coworkers discussing today how they’ve been sick non-stop “because of the masks”. I so wanted to point out how I haven’t been sick since having Covid in August of 2020 despite also having to wear the disgusting masks, and how I could precisely tell them WHEN they started getting sick all the time...but I refrained. I worry for them. Denial is a powerful thing.
I work in an outpatient surgery center so I can’t speak to what it’s like in the hospitals, but I will say that I’ve witnessed my coworkers come up with many unusual ailments immediately following their shots (shingles, unexplained petechiae, elevated HR & BP, chest pain, flare up of Crohn’s, miscarriage) as well as the repeated respiratory illnesses they can’t seem to shake. Others seem (thankfully) totally unaffected. I’d say the majority have/had issues.
Most have a normal/healthy BMI and all are under 58 years old (majority under 40). It’s hard to know who administered their shots, but around here any pharmacist, RN, LPN, or MA can administer after a very brief training.
Good question. There are so many things that can become deranged in mammalian respiratory systems. Straight answer, I don’t know. Here are some possibilities:
1. Is it true that the serially jabbed experience cough more often, or more severe or more persistent coughing than do unvaccinated people? Assume “Yes” for the purpose of this post.
Note that the entire respiratory tree from mouth to alveoli, plural membranes, diaphragm, chest wall & accessory respiratory muscles, is well provided with sensory nerves. Some are mechanosensory & fire when stretched, triggering cough.
2. Pulmonary thromboses (blood clots). This will cause blood flow to be constrained downstream of the occlusion despite an extensive collateral circulation. Mechano- & chemoreceptors (hypoxia / hypercapnia) each can drive couch.
3. Airway narrowing caused in any of numerous ways, from clots, immune derangements, which can cause inflammation. Such narrowing definitely drives cough, such as in otherwise almost symptom free asthma.
4. Disturbances of the ACE2 receptor system. Believe it or not, there’s a well recognized side effect of ACE inhibitors which is to produce cough (classic of toxicology is Captopril cough). I don’t know if blocking ACE2 can do this.
5. Facilitates repeated infections with all sorts of pathogens & all the way to pneumonia.
Well, probably the lungs got hurt disseminatedly by a cloud of LNPs...and created inflammation. I am sure many kids get asthma when they get vaccinated. I know 2nd son suddenly has asthma after his 3rd old shots! As I state in my last article, a friend lost 30% of his lungs post-vaccination. People who get stung by bees also issues in the lungs and die. Tren Cough also shows particles start hurting in the lungs. The PEG is actually protecting many, without PEG, I believe the death toll would have been stratospheric.
Already watched as a Crawford RTE groupie new shows get priority.. especially love the analogies like the bullet proof vest example and adore "prions and amyloids are not the apocalypse" riff.. always immensely reassuring to me to learn the many ways Mother Nature is out in front of the challenges.. it's almost as if evolutionary science outperforms Pfizer! <3
It's an overwhelming emotional journey.. isolating, vexing and draining but hopefully my battle scars can be some consolation. It took 15 years of grass roots effort to move US public from GMO are conspiracy theory to Millions Against Monsanto in streets round the globe.
The same cabal of Rockefeller-Gates pharmers are the foundation of the plandemic. BMGF & acronym cronies have unleashed a tsunami of skeptics and drawn incredible talents like you and Mathew, too many to name across all disciplines, crowdsourcing research.
You're on the crest of the wave and the change is following you. In these cynical old eyes it looks like we have finally passed from a century of Dark Ages and into a bright Renaissance. Lucky us to have the front row seats!
As I’ve previously stated….I believe Marc’s Bolus hypothesis is sound and can explain a lot of adverse events, including deaths. But, I don’t believe the Bolus hypothesis answers all of the fallout from the mRNA vaccines. So my intent was not to poison the well, but instead begin to challenge it as the all encompassing answer.
Tom,
Don't worry you are not the only one stating that. :-)
Right now many people suggest mechanisms of harms but they are based on a pile of assumptions. So I am very comfortable with my theory which has almost zero assumption (except the leak of immature hematopoietic cells from the bone marrow causing immune depression).
My Bolus theory doesn't address longer term issues tied to homologies that could trigger autoimmune disorders. The only AE type that is not explained - as of today - is blood cancer. May be they are simply cancer acceleration which the Bolus Theory explains. To my knowledge the rest falls into my 4 categories.
It’s great that you’ve worked through the mechanisms to eliminate assumptions which makes for comfortable explanations. Aside from the blood cancers, would you consider the long white fibrous clots (being found by numerous embalmers) to be an explainable phenomenon within the Bolus theory?
Absolutely.
They are in my A Category:
1 - Concentrated transfection in the artery
2 - Immune attack strips endothelial wall
3 - Smooth muscle cell layer decays as it's not supposed to be in direct contact with blood flow.
4 - Elastin layer is left bare without calcification inhibitors produced by smooth muscle cells. Elastin captures crystals in the blood.
5 - Aneurism is created, and arterial rupture occurs
Hmmmm, Interesting…. Cogitating on that (with some difficulty)…. but thanks for addressing that!
Sorry if this is out of context but worth passing on to your group as well as Mike Yeadon.
This may be the huge confounding factor (along with your Bolus hypothesis) as the invisible elephant in the room interacting with graphene, aluminum etc to bring about AEs;
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/fifth-generation-5g-directed-energy
Respectfully, it isn't an elephant in the room. If graphene and aluminium were the problem. Every body would have problem, and the problem would be systemic. Not everybody has problem (Thankfully!!) and the AEs are not systemic. There's no cytokine storm in the current AEs.
In mutual respect, I think your reply is a bit simplistic in its dismissal of EMRs affecting graphene which I turn affects cell metabolism.
EMRs/EMFs can be manipulated in innumerable ways, shapes and forms to affect conductive particles.
Regardless of whether EMRs/EMFs are being intentionally incorporated into an experimental eugenics program, it would defy logic to dismiss research demonstrating their growing effects on human biology.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/expert-report-fifth-generation-5g-directed-energy-radiation-emissions-context-nanometal-contaminated-vaccines-include-covid-19-graphite-ferrous-oxide-antennas/5786727
Tom,
You may be right. But I am not seeing any of the clinical signs that substantiate any of it. The same rationale that I expressed about the spike works for Graphene.
Why not everybody dying? Why no necrosis at the point of injection? Why localised damage? Why no damage in the tissue? Why not systemic damage as the graphene would inevitably be systemic? Why only the endothelium?
Either you believe the human body is a marvellous machine or you don't. I believe it's smarter than any technology we throw at it. If the quantities of graphene were significant enough and would stay in the body I would think this is credible. But the quantities of graphene has to be very small, and a huge part of it has to be shedded away in the feces. Thinking it all goes to the cells is a physical impossibility the ratio of surface/volume has got to be ridiculously small. And the probabilities of them entering cells are very small versus taking the exit doors, shedding them out.
I believe all these folks on graphene are playing the game of scaring people to get research funding or to get YouTube dollars. They are vultures telling stories. This is entertainment not science, just like Climate Change, IMHO. I am not into scaring people. May be I am wrong. I am only human, mon ami. But I only work on tangible verifiable data.
Mark, all very good question. And I can respond to some of them at least in part.
As you said, and I agree wholeheartedly that the human body was marvelously designed with powerful, albeit not fully understood immune system.
And, though some might say that EMRs’ effects on cellular biology enter somewhat into woo woo science, I’d characterize it more as emerging or frontier science. Yet virology itself is somewhat comparable in that respect as there are vacuums left in today’s explanation of SARS Cov-2 and (its) isolation, apparent replication and symptomatic manifestations.
And, as far as companies, teams, organizations and individuals seeking research funding for all things Covid, I’d say that there’s little comparison as to the fear based greed in that massive camp than from the EMF researchers.
I won’t go into a great detailed response to tour excellent questions but if you were to take the time to digest the video linked in my previous post, you could begin to visualize the possibilities of EMF (primarily microwave) involvement in weaponizing the vaccines…. which could be done through simple or complex pulsed frequency and amplitude modulations into random or organized environments….. especially considering that graphene is both highly conductive and magnetic which through frequency tuning could be amalgamated into organs or regions of the body. IMHO, this grand experiment involves multiple medium inputs.
Perhaps EMRs don’t interest you but since you have a voice in the conversation, I’m simply trying to interject a broader scope for consideration and discussion.
Best to you
Don't worry my lovely wife has been telling me about it for 2,5 years. Trust me.
I can imagine very high power EMR devices to harm, but they don't need graphene for that, water is fine or iron. I just don't believe the graphene would stay in the body, the laws of physics and probability show most of it would be shedded, and cells don't let enter things 10nm object like that. Many experiments are done at crazy concentrations, and aren't relevant.
Time will tell nothing we can do about it now. Think TV and media is a much more effective way to control people.
Bless you both
Great information, although there are already reports of the nanoparticles across multiple barriers even injected intra-muscularly that didn't hit a vein. For example the mammary gland which has tight junctions of cells forming the blood-milk barrier that filters the substances, yet there are still mRNA concentration found in breast milk in the recent study.
Also, I remember in your previous post you stated that there are about 10 billion lipid nanoparticles in Pfizer and 50 billions in Moderna. However, I discovered this paper published by FDA: https://www.fda.gov/media/151707/download At the bottom of page 19 the paper gives the volume of the lipid ingredients, if you add up the numbers, there is a total of 570ug lipids in one single injection. I do not know the correct weight of a single lipid nanoparticle, but based on its diameter 60-100nm and many of the calculations I have done myself, even the smallest number is something trillionth instead of just billionth. So can you please double check if your previous statement and calculation of there being just billions LNP is correct?
Hi Damian, if the mRNA is passing the barrier, it's likely because it's been made leaky by immune attacks. The size is such that there's no way it can pass.
Some folks have showed Spike pass which is much smaller the BBB (but with obscene concentrations), but still I would be surprised it would pass the milk-blood barrier without some kind of damage. But I have been wrong before.
I read that they likely passed through by extracellular vesicles(like exosomes and liposomes) secreted from the cells that have uptake the LNP. The cells in our body constantly exchange materials with each other through extracellular vesicles all the time, a cell can package any materials into its extracellular vesicles, then release them to be delivered into neighboring cells. Those vesicles can be as small as 25~30nm so they can easily pass through any barriers in tissues without any damage or breakage at all. This has been a blind spot in regarding the distribution of the vaccine genes around the body since the beginning.
I haven't calculate that I have trusted the manufacturers.
Thanks, you read about the number of the LNPs from the manufacturer of Pfizer/Moderna?
Yes
And the 570ug lipid volume in the fda paper is also given by the manufacturer of Pfizer. So either their data contradicts to themselves or the calculations are more complex then.
I appreciate your work and have come to accept that your bolus hypothesis is a likely cause for many of the adverse effects of the mRNA injections, especially those cases involving short term manifestations, including death.
As time and information have converged, I’m increasingly convinced that another co-factor is causing AEs, especially those occurring weeks (at the earliest) and months or longer for the most resilient.
I understand that the basic mechanisms are still being worked in the mosaic of Covid injections, but it at well be worth evaluating these mechanisms in light of additional data parameters, including rollout of 5G user exposure.
It’s been demonstrated that EMFs are affecting cellular biology in plants and animals. And, it’s also a given that EMFs interact with nonbiological particles such as graphene and aluminum, both increasingly found in the mRNA vial samples and in human tissue.
Though funding for EMFs interaction with (these particles) and their effect on human biology is mostly limited to weapons programs, it may be worth analyzing data which incorporates proximity, rollout (and amplitude if available) of 4G/5G.
Perhaps this adds an intolerable level of complexity to the equation, but it may be worth getting input from knowledgeable engineers and scientists in this field in order to ascertain whether key data exists to begin adding in a partitioned analysis.
No one else has been adding this to their discussions, which I view as an information vacuum. Generating some preliminary data analysis may stimulate greater concentrations of valuable input. (...or not?)
Florida Surgeon General states 84% young healthy males will suffer Cardiac complications following Covid Vax. LIABILITY for vax makers would stop this carnage! Currently it's their stolen Licence to kill - emanating from a 1976 TEMPORARY cessation of LIABILITY for an equally useless vaccine for Swine Flu, After 50+ US civilians died POST-VAX the Experiment was abandoned - deemed as being "TOO DANGEROUS"! Now the VAX-related deaths are in the millions but still they keep jabbing. My theory is that it's not for Covid - It's 'De-population. Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed after joining the dots!
Most if not all of those who were "affected by Covid" (in 2020 and down the line) were not in fact "affected by Covid" in any meaningful way.
People in nursing homes and hospitals were being killed directly through policies and medical protocols.
I attend weekly meetings which are 3-4 hours in length which go into excruciating detail on the hospital protocols. There are usually around 70-90 attendees. The majority of those in the meetings have had a loved one killed inside the hospital directly due to Covid protocols.
There are many thousand of these stories that are being collected. All of these stories have the same basic template.
They describe what happened inside those hospitals in the most comprehensive way imaginable. Many of these people are in the process of litigation or moving in that direction. It is impossible to convey the brutality of what was happening in these hospitals. You have to hear the stories to understand and believe it.
Similar or worse was happening in nursing homes.
I believe it is a very difficult task to prove that there is even a single Covid death for any individual regardless of age or level of health.
There was no pandemic.
Great discussion!
There is a product with LNPs already approved an on the market. But instead on mRNAs it has much smaller siRNA (about 200 nucleotides) and is called Onpattro (patisaran). It is given as an iv infusion over 80 minutes every 3 weeks for hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis in adults. It is also required to premedicate prior to the infusion to avoid infusion related reactions which can be significant. https://www.onpattrohcp.com/files/pdfs/ONPATTRO-Dosing-and-Preparation-Guide.pdf
Full EMA assessment here. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/onpattro-epar-public-assessment-report_.pdf. The cationic lipid in this drug is designed to go primarily to the liver but the review notes:
Overall, mainly the lipid part of the LNP is taken up and broken down in liver cells, endothelial cells and phagocytic cells. Organs/tissues with cells rich in LDL-like and related scavenger receptors and/or where a fenestrated endothelium exists are also capable of taking up the LNP (e.g., lymph nodes, spleen, bone marrow vessels, and adrenal gland)
Might be useful to review and find commonalities with the vaccine LNPs.
Excellent and informative post, and comments below. Thank you, all of you.
I think it might help if some more colloquial term was used rather than "bolus". The idea that the injection should be slow seems very sensible, but "bolus" is not part of my vocabulary as a layperson. Of course, if the "bolus" idea gains popularity then people will know the word.
My 2¢:
I have always known "bolus" as a clump, the main example being a blob of chewed-up food in one's mouth or throat, i.e. something like what James hastily expresses below when referring to ruminants. But, prompted by Bob's comment, I consulted the AHD and note that it does include a detailed 2nd definition as a technical medical term:
https://ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=bolus
I think it's appropriate to keep "bolus", but it might be worthwhile to include an initial note to readers that a bolus is a "clump" or "mass".
It is the medical term. A "swarm" of nanoparticles ?
That's true, and maybe it is only an issue for me. I have a bad memory for new technical words, and I am not a medical person.
I might say "a bolus (a concentrated bundle of vaccine in the blood)", but maybe that is unnecessary for most people.
you perfectly right, I'll use "swarm"...think pple can relate to that
How about a “swarming bolus”? I’m rooting for #teambolus myself as it’s emblematic of a bullet for me whereas swarm seems too diffuse. And I absolutely know you have bigger fish to fry versus this level of parsing. TY for all you do! 💪🙏🏻🔥🧠
Thanks for your excellent work! However, the presentation on the Rumble platform detracts from the seriousness of the issue, with the LOUD ADS for GOLD and MAGA and other issues. This will turn off many who might be swayed by your argument.
Marc.
Your credibility took a hit on your statement that Spike (S1) is cleared and
:-)
Love you guys too.
English is my second language. I am not a biologist.
So if I don't use their language I get even more clobbered!
On the Spike and my credibility.
The 60 day Spike was actually a reinfection...and most studies have been trying to show some spike very far out to prove the vaccine are effective long...It's a fraud, or at least a manipulation. They never tell the quantities of Spike which are abysmally small and thus irrelevant in terms of toxicology. Even on picture they show traces...what do we care for traces 5 months out? Toxicity is about quantity. I focus on what relevant. I am not here to scare people on the contrary.
Moreover, on Spike toxicity most studies in-vitro use very high concentrations much greater than anything seen in-vivo (like 10,000x). I stick to science and I prefer sticking to fundamental laws of Science rather than flaky study and house-of-cards assumptions.
Sorry to disappoint you.
Bien dit, Monsieur!
Is not a factor after 60 days.
Your in the minority view on that one.
Secondly, bolus is what a ruminate animals bletch up during cud chewing.
Work on your marketing.
Do better.
Bolus- A single dose of a drug or other substance given over a short period of time. It is usually given by infusion or injection into a blood vessel. It may also be given by mouth.
In radiology, a tissue-equivalent material placed on the surface of the body to minimize the effects of an irregularly shaped body surface. The dose at the skin surface tends to increase, minimizing the skin-sparing effect of megavoltage radiation.
IV bolus- when vitamins or medications are taken over a longer time period, typically one to 30 minutes in non-emergency situations. The IV fluid line is typically wide open, as opposed to a typical slower drip of a long-dosing standard IV.
That a hypothesis is the minority view does not make that argument invalid. That's the bandwagon fallacy- one of the classic logical fallacies.
Avoid all marketing.
Do better.
As I said, the study that showed a renewed spike at 60 days was either r a reinfection,. Or a trace of S1 in a GC. None of it is material.
As to the Bolus terminology, it is the medical term used for the phenomenon I am describing...
You’re being harsh and officious imo. People are trying so hard to be helpful.
Marc, kudos on your thinking & output, for the longest time, on the COVID fraud!
As you’ll probably know, I’ve recently adjusted my position on the virus. Specifically, just this virus. Set aside the wider existential question about viruses, as I don’t think it can be resolved unequivocally. For some reason, some people conflate their view that, since a given type of pathogen does exist, then THIS ONE must also exist. That’s just not logical.
There’s some convincing evidence AGAINST the narrative that says there’s a novel, lethal respiratory virus, SARS-CoV-2, which is circulating and - crucially - causing massive scale illnesses and deaths.
Have you had the chance to listen to the interview between Denis Rancourt & Jeremy Nell (of Jerm Warfare)?
Some (many?) will find implausible Rancourt’s inference, based on patterns in all-causes mortality data, in 50 states over 100 weeks, that there is no unequivocal evidence for & much evidence against the central narrative claim about a virus.
It is a shocking claim, granted.
I’m very interested in your take on Rancourt's findings. No rush.
Cheers!
Mike
The average age of a death by or with "Covid-19" is higher than life expectancy in all Western countries. No other figure even need be known to understand the "pandemic" (business model) is a fraud and a giant Ponzi scheme.
In the US the "Covid death" number is cooked/manipulated due to how the CDC does their accounting as well as many other factors- an audit of the CDC mortality numbers would illustrate the blatant fraud.
I have looked at the CDC's mortality database for ALL Covid coded deaths. You would have a hard time making a case that there is even a single Covid death in any age group regardless of level of health.
1) The first thing that must be addressed is "who were these people?" The average age of a "Covid death" was 78 in the US and 82 globally w/4 comorbidities on average. The largest bloc of these people were from nursing homes, assisted living, hospice etc. Where did the vast majority of initial "Covid deaths" occur? Here in the US (and everywhere in the West- Milan, Madrid, London, Brussels, Montreal, Toronto, etc.) most in "the first wave" who died from "Covid" already had one foot in the grave and their death was put on fast forward through medical protocols not an anomalous viral event.
What we had here in the US was a radical and mandatory shift in policies relating to hospitals, care homes and the overall social order. These new "policies" were mandated through various new and aberrant state "guidelines" which resulted in a concentrated death rate for a six week period in March/April. Take that out of the equation and there is no death rate to talk about. Put (or keep) these policies in place and we will have this happen every year.
There was mass medical murder in the hospitals and gross negligence (beyond the usual) in numeorus nursing homes in specific US cities that led to abandonment and medication alterations that turned these slow motion abattoirs into death houses. One of the remarkable things of note is that here in the US the "pandemic" was not widespread (which is supposed to be one of the defining features of a pandemic) but was in fact limited to very specific locations;
2) The faulty diagnosis of what is a "Covid death" did they die "with" or "from" Covid which is problematic for several reasons. In many cases an actual test was never done only a "presumed to be Covid" assessment was put forth. Add to this that when the tests were done PCR tests done with faulty specs (gene sequencing, cycle thresholds, annealing problems, faulty primers and so forth) were used. PCR can't diagnose anything in the first place and compounded with these problems they are useless and misleading.
99% of people falsely certified as having 'died from covid' actually died from their preexisting conditions being exacerbated by mass medical malpractice and 'public health' despotism, the other 1% simply died of old age.
From the CDC itself 7/16/21: "Of the 540,667 hospitalized coronavirus patients included in the study, 80,174 died during the observation period (March 2020 to March 2021).
A whopping 99.1% of the patients who died had at least one pre-existing condition, with just 740 having no prior condition on record. Most patients who died from COVID had multiple pre-existing conditions, with just 2.6% suffering from only one condition, compared to 32.3% who had two to five preexisting conditions, 39.1% who had six to ten, and 25.1% who have more than ten pre-existing conditions."
Translation: No one has 'died from covid' as "covid" is nothing more than a fraudulent PCR result plus a nebulous clinical re-branding of cold, "flu" and many other disease conditions.
3) No autopsies. Why were no autopsies done in the US? Why did they pass new mandates that halted all autopsies for "Covid deaths?" This went against decades long protocol. They also changed decades old protocol on how death certificates should be filed;
4) Home deaths is yet another way that figures were cooked. This was admitted point blank by Stephanie Buehle (NY Dept. of Health spokesperson) among others who stated that home deaths with no testing at all would be presumed "Covid deaths." This "guideline" was mandated through the NY Health Dept;
5) Covid death counts were forged- CDC instructed officials and altered guidelines, on March 24, 2020 in violation of Federal Law, to certify any death as "caused by" COVID if the decedent tested positive prior to passing or was suspected of having "C19", even if it wasn't the actual cause of death. Thus we have major misattribution. E.g., we have over 14,000 injury deaths listed in the "C19 death" total.
We also have unexplained declines in other common death categories because so many have been attributed to "C19." The unprecedented broad definition of "C19" death created huge fraud in "Covid death" counts;
6) Another way they inflated death counts was through hospital admissions and faulty PCR testing. This caused a huge spike in iatrogenic deaths caused by misattribution of "Covid" to incoming patients and the ensuing improper treatments applied e.g. ventilators, remdesivir and associated fentanyl dosages which killed thousands.
So for example if one came in with a coronary condition you would be given a "Covid test" no matter what- all admissions required this- and then if you died while in the hospital you could have been listed as a "Covid death." This happened frequently through the year.
The practice of PCR-testing hospital admissions who are asymptomatic for Covid using high Ct values undoubtedly caused deaths and unnecessary suffering.
This matters for several reasons. A pneumonia patient e.g. has a very good chance of surviving with correct support. However, if the patient tests ‘+’ for the non-existent pathogen an entirely different medical protocol goes into action and with this and there is little chance of survival.
The 'diagnosis' of "Covid" effectively permits dangerous protocols to be enacted that then increase the chance of mortality.
With regard to adoption of a new RT-PCR protocol for hospital admissions this also falsely manufactured death statistics for "Covid." Add to this how it was incentivized-$$$$$ while hospitals are under extreme financial duress. The US hospital system had it's worst financial quarter on record in the middle of a "pandemic." Administrators were under pressure to alleviate that financial pain and exploit all openings in the CARES Act.
None of this was accidental.
7) Lockdown impacts- too numerous to cite here.
In short whatever "excess deaths" which may have occurred anywhere can be attributed to people who didn't have to die but were KILLED due to the unnecessary use of ventilators, harsh toxic drugs, people dying prematurely due to lack of medical treatment, ill effects from the lockdowns and so on.
Are you speaking of the fact that the measures is what killed people and not the virus?
If that's the case, I completely agree. Jonathan Engler and Duncan Golicher came to the same conclusion in Italy and England. It was quite obvious for me too from the beginning because the virus had been around for some time and doctors were treating with the usual medicine, and when it hit the care homes, they changes the rules, came up with a crazy protocol (no treatment, ventilating everybody, no anti-inflammatory, not to mention death by injection...).
Will listen to Denis who is very smart.
Hi Mike,
Nice to hear from you.
I find biologists to be very imaginative but rarely rigorous in logic. So you could be right or wrong on the virus. Raoult seems to be pretty convincing...
I have been interacting with Denis lately who likes my theory. But haven't had a chance to listen. Will listen and give you my take.
We should have a video. Hope the family is well.
All my best,
Marc
Marc, yes, it’s the observation that deliberately awful medical “treatment” & absent of appropriate treatments that are adequate explanations for the excess deaths. Denis Rancourt’s evidence is much more exhaustive than Jonathan Engler’s. Jonathan’s conclusions are that there’s no need to invoke a virus to explain what had happened.
I’d value your assessment of Denis’s analyses & conclusions, but my take is that his evidence actively excludes a novel viral cause (as well as, like Jonathan’s, showing adequate explanations for the excess deaths).
All is as well as can be expected!
Happy to record an update conversation perhaps end October?
All the best
Mike
Hi Mike,
As mentioned upstream I am currently involved with a group that meets through Zoom each Monday evening. The meetings are usually around 3 hours. These are very serious people who have had loved ones killed by Covid protocols and most are either already involved in or are currently pursuing legal action.
At these meetings there are usually 2 or 3 invited speakers (such as the lawyers representing families in Fresno or AJ DePriest et al) combined with individuals who go into the details of what happened to their family member in the hospital.
If you are ever interested in sitting in and hearing these stories I can arrange this. These are some of the most visceral and disturbing accounts I have heard throughout this Covid ordeal. It gives one a firm grasp on what happened in the hospitals.
Excellent discussion.
No matter how you slice it those who have been injected with this crap are in deep trouble. That most have been serially injected is profoundly ominous.
What I'm seeing is that once young, healthy people who previous to the injections had high baseline health levels are now getting sick regularly.
One of the many manifestations of this I am seeing is a persistent cough. By persistent I mean this same niggling, sharp cough that they have had for months on end. I call it the human version of "kennel cough."
What is the mechanism that is causing this?
I, the only unjabbed RN in my department, sat silently and and listened to two coworkers discussing today how they’ve been sick non-stop “because of the masks”. I so wanted to point out how I haven’t been sick since having Covid in August of 2020 despite also having to wear the disgusting masks, and how I could precisely tell them WHEN they started getting sick all the time...but I refrained. I worry for them. Denial is a powerful thing.
Any idea on how widespread this is in your hopsital?
I work in an outpatient surgery center so I can’t speak to what it’s like in the hospitals, but I will say that I’ve witnessed my coworkers come up with many unusual ailments immediately following their shots (shingles, unexplained petechiae, elevated HR & BP, chest pain, flare up of Crohn’s, miscarriage) as well as the repeated respiratory illnesses they can’t seem to shake. Others seem (thankfully) totally unaffected. I’d say the majority have/had issues.
That's sad.
Do they have high BMI?
Where they injected by professional nurses?
Most have a normal/healthy BMI and all are under 58 years old (majority under 40). It’s hard to know who administered their shots, but around here any pharmacist, RN, LPN, or MA can administer after a very brief training.
Good question. There are so many things that can become deranged in mammalian respiratory systems. Straight answer, I don’t know. Here are some possibilities:
1. Is it true that the serially jabbed experience cough more often, or more severe or more persistent coughing than do unvaccinated people? Assume “Yes” for the purpose of this post.
Note that the entire respiratory tree from mouth to alveoli, plural membranes, diaphragm, chest wall & accessory respiratory muscles, is well provided with sensory nerves. Some are mechanosensory & fire when stretched, triggering cough.
2. Pulmonary thromboses (blood clots). This will cause blood flow to be constrained downstream of the occlusion despite an extensive collateral circulation. Mechano- & chemoreceptors (hypoxia / hypercapnia) each can drive couch.
3. Airway narrowing caused in any of numerous ways, from clots, immune derangements, which can cause inflammation. Such narrowing definitely drives cough, such as in otherwise almost symptom free asthma.
4. Disturbances of the ACE2 receptor system. Believe it or not, there’s a well recognized side effect of ACE inhibitors which is to produce cough (classic of toxicology is Captopril cough). I don’t know if blocking ACE2 can do this.
5. Facilitates repeated infections with all sorts of pathogens & all the way to pneumonia.
Probably other things I forgot or didn’t know!
Well, probably the lungs got hurt disseminatedly by a cloud of LNPs...and created inflammation. I am sure many kids get asthma when they get vaccinated. I know 2nd son suddenly has asthma after his 3rd old shots! As I state in my last article, a friend lost 30% of his lungs post-vaccination. People who get stung by bees also issues in the lungs and die. Tren Cough also shows particles start hurting in the lungs. The PEG is actually protecting many, without PEG, I believe the death toll would have been stratospheric.
Already watched as a Crawford RTE groupie new shows get priority.. especially love the analogies like the bullet proof vest example and adore "prions and amyloids are not the apocalypse" riff.. always immensely reassuring to me to learn the many ways Mother Nature is out in front of the challenges.. it's almost as if evolutionary science outperforms Pfizer! <3
Thank you Pamela. Feels very lonely where I am at right now.
It's an overwhelming emotional journey.. isolating, vexing and draining but hopefully my battle scars can be some consolation. It took 15 years of grass roots effort to move US public from GMO are conspiracy theory to Millions Against Monsanto in streets round the globe.
The same cabal of Rockefeller-Gates pharmers are the foundation of the plandemic. BMGF & acronym cronies have unleashed a tsunami of skeptics and drawn incredible talents like you and Mathew, too many to name across all disciplines, crowdsourcing research.
You're on the crest of the wave and the change is following you. In these cynical old eyes it looks like we have finally passed from a century of Dark Ages and into a bright Renaissance. Lucky us to have the front row seats!
Link?
click the picture for the video
Click on the picture of the event.
or https://rumble.com/v1ndbfe-rte-discussions-8-take-two-evidence-of-lipid-nanoparticle-harm-with-marc-gi.html