Unnaturally long wound borders triggered by a Bolus of particles running down the vascular system necessarily stimulate unmanageable levels of coagulation factor we never evolved for.
The principle is zeta potential as the determiner of colloidal suspension.
The so called spike protein - (meaning I am not sure of its claims or etiology as stated by its patent holders) - is extremely cationic - leading to blood sludge-clumping microstrokes etc.
In fact all the symptoms common to vaccines - but showing up as a result of heitened attention/questioning and perhaps more agravating components.
I don't limit this effect to nanopaticulates or but if you wanted to GoF a way to kill cells AS IF by invisible infectious agents, that could then be attributed to manual genetic therapy 'transfection' then you can set the charge for the genetic bio security state to 'save us' from the fallout from a reset of original sin - as irrevocably damaged genetics.
All of which could be of course nonsense - BUT so would all of what transpired in the last 3 years be to go back an warn anyone of 5 years ago.
Are you aware of the nature of water inside the body, cells and blood as having electrical structure? That lines the endothelium with an exclusion zone of negatively charged crystalline gel water? That if this beaks down then your postulates of basic plumbing come into play.
I don't seek belief, I prompt lines and avenues of questioning.
The gel water takes on a hexagonal lattice of molecular alignment that has bio-electrical qualities.
graphene sheets have a hexagonal lattice of atomic alignment that has bio-electrical qualities. Whether that is anything to do with the 'Spike Agenda' even as stealth experiments under cover of other confusions - who knows? But you can easily look up the research of a such intentions being acted out on animal subjects. It is multi-billion dollar investment.
To my knowledge there is NO oversight or regulatory structures for the application of nanotech - which casual search reveals ubiquitous in many different applications far beyond but including biology. the nature of nanoparticulates within biofields is part of natural function - but the discovery of this is amazingly used by insiders for marketising and weaponizing gain of function. How surprising is that! (not!).
Read amidwesterndoctor's clear exposition of the various factors involved.
Whether graphene itself is involved is secondary to the nature and function of zeta potential within this issue of death and disease directly associating with mass injections.
amidwesterndoctor is not pushing graphene or nanotech as he completely accepts 'spike protein™ claims for covid as a novel disease from a novel virus. So he looks no further for suspects but draws attention to the unrecognised 'micro-strokes' associated with blood sludge first brought to attention by Andrew Moulden.
I wonder where psyop ends and the negative biologic reactions begin. There is a realm of nested deceits that are more a part of our conditioned mind and worldview than we realise.
Make of this what you will. I wont persist beyond sharing what I value to those who recognise something worthy of investigation.
You did not as yet receive the first message - because you skimmed it without listening.
In any case the bolus angle is a genuine facet in all this but has no dramatic traction in a realm of invested opiniuon - not discounting the vast resources of the social engineeringfocused to engineering our thoughts - by modelling reactions and being always several steps ahead of anything but love.
Please go and check the concentrations of spike post D9 first shot. It's very very low.
Not even detectable.
Why?
(1) because T-cells start destroying transfecting cells almost immediately, and (2) the blood is loaded with antibodies.
There's nearly zero possibility of spike harming cells past the first shot.go and see Ogata et al...
I would add that there are so many Abs goalkeeping the entry that spike has 0% chance of entering. And bTW we are not finding massive presence of spike, more localized ie following transfection.
Why could it not be liver damage of some sort? Liver damage is a known side effect. I have two close friends that have had their cholesterol sky rocket after receiving the vaccine. Both people have never had high cholesterol before.
First, my Bolus Theory is consistent with the coagulation signalling cascade trigger, it's also consistent with arterial damage.
Another reason is why would systematically if the liver were hit it would create a Thrombosis, more over if the liver were hit it would have shown on the autopsies and been mentioned.
Third, the fact that the longer wounds will stimulate more coagulation factor is a certainty.
So on one end you have a consistent theory demonstrated mathematically and consistent with research and clinical evidence, and on the other side pure conjecture, not substantiated with clinical evidence nor demonstrated.
A bolus is not certain of hitting the liver, it is certain the hit the arteries. Arteries it is.
Subnote, subcutaneous needle injects as compared to deep tissue and muscle or possible accidental veinous injections. Aspiration, might barely address these concerns. Only Subcuteneous injection at most. A observation by a homeopathic care giver, not a western nurse or doctor studies and certified person. Total Idiot, but concerned fellow human.
Here we have a review of hydrolic wounding practices of fluid injection injury of a iiving hermtically self contained organism.
And a first pioneer insight to the advantages of subcutaneous injections of medications, or homepathic needed delivery of medicaments or water memory encouragement of a imbalance or starving person or mamal.
Thanks to the Researcher. Marc Girardot and yourself, Dr. Campbell.
Body of Data Researcher, Broadleigh John Knight, sorry for lack of name recall.
This is a self note, of obviously signifanct research and medical proceedure for generic medical practices.
DR. CAMPBELL, you carry the same name as, Dr. A.R. Campbell of TX, USA who by 1929 or so, concluded Small Pox is a reaction to BED BUG Bite venom or toxin in their mouth where bacterial of such a savapore is quite active. A point he suggested, innoculating a person with Smallpox Vaccines, was useless, since a person bit by such bugs, will always have to excrete the non-water soluable toxin through the skin. Such as happens with Ergot poisoning, as well as; measles, mumps, chicken pox, ect. If one were to seriously avoid confirmation bias in accepting only germ theory or contagion theory or virus theory as the only cause of the skin organ assisting the body in elimination of toxins, venoms, poisons, and industrial pollutants.
DR. A.R. Campbell eliminated small pox in Dallas, TX, specifically by education about hygiene and bed cover cleanlyness, as well as sunbleeching, (minor) air drying quilts and blankets out doors periotically.
See old superstitions about "vampire", sunlight, Bed Bugs Photophobic bahavior, and Dustmite and poop ammerleration by sunlight exposure habits. Yes, analogue science is only a hint at actaul causation clues.
This is LNP-driven harm. I have noted some of my patients develop elevated D-dimer levels at the time of their adverse event. The UK standard of care is to carry out a CT-angiogram to check for PE, and then ignore the D-dimer result if the CT is negative. You have outlined a credible model for vaccine-induced vascular side effects - would D-dimer be elevated in these patients? How should these harms be diagnosed?
Do you have an opinion on what the set of adverse events due to mRNA/ spike protein harm would be?
And are there harms from contamination during the manufacturing process (e.g. DNA contamination)?
The evil intent isn't in the vaccines (even if they were never needed), the evil Intent is pushing the vaccines and keeping going despite the accidents.
I did the analyses: the dosing is OK, the Abs rid most of the spike, there are some issues with manufacturing which can possibly integrate the nucleus in rare cases, the AEs are caused by the bolus, and the bolus accentuates the risks of cancer induced by the vx.
Circulating spike isn't causing this (see my articles that prove it).
Marc, The circulating spike is the antigen against which the immune system, especially after the 3rd booster, begins to respond with IgG4 type antibodies. These are trouble. Most importantly, these can, through what is called Fc-Fc binding, remove from battle antibodies targeting cancer cells/tumors. Too much spike antigen is a real problem in this respect, and it helps explain why so many "turbo cancers" show up after the booster. The counterintuitive aspect of this is that a spike-specific antibody would have any interaction at all with, for instance, a tumor-specific IgG1 antibody that is in the process of fighting the good fight... but it can, and it does!
Your original insights have added greatly to our body of knowledge on vaccine harms... but we can't let the spike protein off the hook. The IgG4 effect is real, and has strong explanatory power for certain of the harms.
The spike is the antigen, but as expressed on transfected cells.
Turbo cancer are caused by immune privileged stem cell transfection. The cancer is turbo bc of the high replicability of stem cells. They have been foundto be s'y inymous with metastasis.
IgG4s are imho a conjecture... Wouldn't be surprise they react with remnants of LNPs which are prese T, when spike hardly is post jab2, except if stem cell and progenitor cells get hit.
When it comes to cancer, latent infections, etc, I'd also be concerned about the ~ 1 week of lymphocytopenia reported in the phase 1-2 trials. E.g.:
"Our previous clinical experience with RNA vaccines suggests that the transient decrease in lymphocytes is likely to be attributable to innate immune stimulation-related redistribution of lymphocytes into lymphoid tissues20."
I have a different hypothesis for lymphocytopenia.
And that's the transfection/permeabilization of the blood-bone marrow barrier which would lead to immature lymphocytes released in theblood, and a reduction in active lymphocytes.
Because most likely the blood bone marrow barrier is permeabilised, and so immature cells are released before they can mature, lowering Tcell count. Once the barrier is repaired, the immune cell can mature. Could also be the Thymus, but the frequency points to the bone-marrow...
I think you’re spot on here. The mechanism of harm is something we haven’t faced before on this scale. Internal damage to the endothelium lining the vascular system would no doubt trigger clotting response and have downstream effects we haven’t experienced before—but the mechanisms aren’t new. What’s new is the intravascular delivery of LNPs and the bolus. This is an area where your theory makes perfect sense!
Marc this is exceptional work and very compelling. Thank you.! Considering the 14K+ different adverse reactions to these experimental Biologicals. Do you have an opinion as to whether these were deliberately formulated to turn the human body into a Biological time bomb? Any opinion on a possible PsyOp?
She is an expert in LNPs which you might find interesting and a conversation between the two of you would be interesting.
Here is one interview in which I think she mentions how she has a theory to explain the long fibrin style clots amoungst an explanation for many other side effects.
I don't trust this lady. She has a bizarre and rude behaviour. She came up with many theories, most of which were falsifiable. Apparently she stated that I stole her theory which I know nothing about. And she clearly hasn't gone anywhere as far as I have.
I want nothing to do with this lady. Thanks for the proposal nonetheless.
Just listened to her for over an hour and I disagree with you Marc. She's an excentric nerd is all. She admitted to guessing but her guesses seemed backed by her experience. I found her fascinating
She has been very rude to me. I don't like being bullied or insulted. The only response is avoidance, else it becomes a humiliating and ressource draining useless fight. Don't have time/ressource for that.
My methodology has never been guessing, I've have been applying rigorously the scientific method.
Posit me this. What if there are micro-razors (aka graphene) slicing up your blood vessels. Would that not make more sense. Please access Dr. Andreas' analysis of graphene being included in the mRNA injections.
The absurd 'Noack' razor blade video was a hoax and specifically targeted to divert those looking at bio nanotech. It worked as intended. The gullible had their fears boosted with disinformation that was then emotionally asserted as claims and accusations that discredited the subject as a topic of discussion.
The fundamental nature of such nanotech is bio-Electrical.
I'd go further to say that our victorian plumbing models of biology are for the most part ignorant of bio-electrical context.
I have no investment in GO as a suspect for covax Experimentation, but I don't rule out the intent of dark spun biotech as a significant element in the global lockstepping active psyop/agenda.
So, him dying in jail is a hoax too? Amazing how you believe believe stuff that is not true. A guy gets arrested about talking abut graphene.. and the next day his is dead? Might be a coincidence, but just seems way too convenience to be so. Oh, and btw, here is an NIH paper stating graphene is in the mRNA https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27266364/
In toxicology, you need a certain level of concentration for damage to occur. If you saturate the body with graphene, sure it will be damaging and people will die. not what we are seeing.
No damages for the vaccine are nots systemic, they are always very much localised. It can be anywhere, but it is not everywhere. Systemic damage would be a cytokine storm and all organs failing. this is not what we are observing. We are observing concentrated hits with tranfection (spike production that triggers an immune attack).
OK Marc, and you please explain the long blood clots that embalmers are experiencing? They look like long scabs.. Also Marc an axe is not as thick as a tree, but it is amazing how many trees have been felled by an axe so your "science" is flawed.
Try chopping a 1meter diameter tree with a 1mm axe...
On the white clots, it's quite simple.
The endothelial lining of blood vessels gets destroyed by a massive immune attack leaves the smooth muscle layer bare. This layer is not designed to withstand circulating blood, and so erodes/decays over time, leaving the elastin layer bare without calcification inhibitors (produced by the smooth muscle layer). So cholesterol calcification and other crystalizations occur and blend to the elastin.
There's no significant spike post D9 jab 1...Nattokinase can help with other aspect of the pathology... If the blood is overwhelmed with coagulation factor nattijinase supplements would make sense.
I used all three of them in the last two years and just use lumbrokinase now because I think it helped me the most but I only had high d dimers and swelling, no real loss of platelets. I don't think enzymes thin the blood vessel wall like ASA does over time.
We have talked a bit on Twitter. I had Astrazen not mRNA and I took the enzymes because of swelling and having heart issues with high d dimer, it was really hard to get medical care, lots are still staying that, I'm in Canada. The vaccine itself went into the back of my shoulder creating a systemic reaction including my heart and liver. Endothelial damage might have been my problem which seems to be still healing two years later or maybe I am developing autoimmune.
I ended up covered in cherry angiomas like old people get, hundreds on my chest back and stomach and into my arms and legs, probably from the swelling or injury to the small vessels near the surface? I have a friend who is a retired doctor.
I recently was told that the batch I had was bad and came from a contaminated factory in the US, and many people died from that batch, so I guess I'm lucky.
I am trying to heal myself without hurting anything.
I think I am better off than those getting new experimental drugs.
As I told Mike, I don't believe in the bad batches story. too many confounders (sse my response to Mike)
The product is cytotoxic by proxy in of itself. Hence the importance of this article.
if all the LNPS in one dose transfected/killed a cell, all vaccinated would have died.
It's like having billions of small bombs in a city, but only a small number explode in isolation, no real harm. But imagine for a reason or another more bombs would explode and they'd explode in clusters, like a truck of ammunition, then the damage is much greater.
I am happy you are doing better. Anything that can help your endothelium is likely welcome. Low inflammation, no vaccines etc..
I will keep learning about endothelium. Interesting, explains reaction/sensitivity to dye from CT scan too asI swelled from it too, and that was five months later and took long time to calm down.
111M views, doesn't cover Astrazen but I found found the scope of injury interesting. Even if you don't buy into it, the side effects are crazy for many people.
First, I appreciate your contributions and found the discussion with Dr. Campbell fascinating and valuable. I am glad I found it.
Jessica Rose has written about the spike triggering development of amyloid proteins as a consequence of the destruction of red blood cells and unfolding of hemoglobin (as I understand it). I believe that post was on or about Sept 15, 2022. However, I agree with you that in most /many cases the immune system would take care of the amyloid proteins but at least hypothetically, in some cases the immune system could be overwhelmed. In reading elsewhere Dr, Mercola has stated that as many as one-third of the proteins a cell makes are misfolded so obviously cells have mechanisms to digest those misfolded proteins and recycle the components. However, in one of Dr. Arne Burkhardt's video presentations of autopsy pathology slides i recall he pointed to evidence of amyloid infiltration and consequent scarring of the heart muscle, suggesting that development of amyloid isn't always cleared by the immune system and amyloidosis is a recognized disease diagnosis pre-Covid which according to a google search is difficult to treat and is often fatal with an average time from diagnosis to death of 3.5 years.
Now, a second item. I would guess that the long 1000 cuts hypothesis also means that such cuts would generate a significant inflammatory response. If so, then there is the potential that the inflammation would trigger calcification of the arteries as a protective response. A simple search on Google or PubMed (of inflammation and calcification) generates numerous papers relating arterial calcification to vascular inflammation, regardless of the cause of the inflammation. The reason for the concern is that my brother recently had a CT cardiac scan that returned a high calcium number. He had previously had one several years prior to mRNA vaccines that was very low with only one small area of calcium deposits. He is lean, 73 yrs old, and is very careful with his diet (primarily vegetarian with seafood and limiting saturated fat - he is a Dr. Steve Gundry adherent) because of our family history of CVD - father, grandfather, mother-stroke, etc. My hypothesis is that his high calcium CT score is actually a consequence of arterial calcification consequent to vascular inflammation consequent to the mRNA vaccine damage of a 1000 cuts as you propose. Is this a reasonable hypothesis?
Calcification is tied to local lack of calcification inhibitors. It means the endothelial wall was damaged in sufficient amount that the inhibitors produced by endothelial cells is deficient.
Of course, the fibrin is part of the coagulation cascade started by "a thousand cuts" scenario.
Again the coagulation cascade started is overwhelming for coagulation inhibitors but likely also to lyse fibrin.
I believe my topological explanation of thrombosis can be extrapolated here at a localised level.
Marc, I met you briefly about in the beginning of this mess during a PANDA meeting. I am grateful you have continued to persevere all these long months in this hypothesis development.
At some point when I’m done w grad school, I would love to collaborate on a paper with you outlining the consequences of your findings for nurses/patients/ medication administration.
I think the ‘thousand cuts’ has merits. I have to come back a reread more slowly.
You are ignoring or not getting 'biophysics'.
The principle is zeta potential as the determiner of colloidal suspension.
The so called spike protein - (meaning I am not sure of its claims or etiology as stated by its patent holders) - is extremely cationic - leading to blood sludge-clumping microstrokes etc.
In fact all the symptoms common to vaccines - but showing up as a result of heitened attention/questioning and perhaps more agravating components.
I don't limit this effect to nanopaticulates or but if you wanted to GoF a way to kill cells AS IF by invisible infectious agents, that could then be attributed to manual genetic therapy 'transfection' then you can set the charge for the genetic bio security state to 'save us' from the fallout from a reset of original sin - as irrevocably damaged genetics.
All of which could be of course nonsense - BUT so would all of what transpired in the last 3 years be to go back an warn anyone of 5 years ago.
Are you aware of the nature of water inside the body, cells and blood as having electrical structure? That lines the endothelium with an exclusion zone of negatively charged crystalline gel water? That if this beaks down then your postulates of basic plumbing come into play.
I don't seek belief, I prompt lines and avenues of questioning.
The gel water takes on a hexagonal lattice of molecular alignment that has bio-electrical qualities.
graphene sheets have a hexagonal lattice of atomic alignment that has bio-electrical qualities. Whether that is anything to do with the 'Spike Agenda' even as stealth experiments under cover of other confusions - who knows? But you can easily look up the research of a such intentions being acted out on animal subjects. It is multi-billion dollar investment.
To my knowledge there is NO oversight or regulatory structures for the application of nanotech - which casual search reveals ubiquitous in many different applications far beyond but including biology. the nature of nanoparticulates within biofields is part of natural function - but the discovery of this is amazingly used by insiders for marketising and weaponizing gain of function. How surprising is that! (not!).
Read amidwesterndoctor's clear exposition of the various factors involved.
Whether graphene itself is involved is secondary to the nature and function of zeta potential within this issue of death and disease directly associating with mass injections.
amidwesterndoctor is not pushing graphene or nanotech as he completely accepts 'spike protein™ claims for covid as a novel disease from a novel virus. So he looks no further for suspects but draws attention to the unrecognised 'micro-strokes' associated with blood sludge first brought to attention by Andrew Moulden.
I wonder where psyop ends and the negative biologic reactions begin. There is a realm of nested deceits that are more a part of our conditioned mind and worldview than we realise.
Make of this what you will. I wont persist beyond sharing what I value to those who recognise something worthy of investigation.
You did not as yet receive the first message - because you skimmed it without listening.
In any case the bolus angle is a genuine facet in all this but has no dramatic traction in a realm of invested opiniuon - not discounting the vast resources of the social engineeringfocused to engineering our thoughts - by modelling reactions and being always several steps ahead of anything but love.
Please go and check the concentrations of spike post D9 first shot. It's very very low.
Not even detectable.
Why?
(1) because T-cells start destroying transfecting cells almost immediately, and (2) the blood is loaded with antibodies.
There's nearly zero possibility of spike harming cells past the first shot.go and see Ogata et al...
I would add that there are so many Abs goalkeeping the entry that spike has 0% chance of entering. And bTW we are not finding massive presence of spike, more localized ie following transfection.
https://rumble.com/v1qhs6k-cv19-vax-destroys-hearts-and-brains-of-billions-of-people-dr-sucharit-bhakd.html
https://rumble.com/v1qy8mi-interview-anatomy-of-a-covid-vaccine-injury-dr-sucharit-bhakdi-virologist.html
Why could it not be liver damage of some sort? Liver damage is a known side effect. I have two close friends that have had their cholesterol sky rocket after receiving the vaccine. Both people have never had high cholesterol before.
Apologies thought I had responded.
First, my Bolus Theory is consistent with the coagulation signalling cascade trigger, it's also consistent with arterial damage.
Another reason is why would systematically if the liver were hit it would create a Thrombosis, more over if the liver were hit it would have shown on the autopsies and been mentioned.
Third, the fact that the longer wounds will stimulate more coagulation factor is a certainty.
So on one end you have a consistent theory demonstrated mathematically and consistent with research and clinical evidence, and on the other side pure conjecture, not substantiated with clinical evidence nor demonstrated.
A bolus is not certain of hitting the liver, it is certain the hit the arteries. Arteries it is.
Subnote, subcutaneous needle injects as compared to deep tissue and muscle or possible accidental veinous injections. Aspiration, might barely address these concerns. Only Subcuteneous injection at most. A observation by a homeopathic care giver, not a western nurse or doctor studies and certified person. Total Idiot, but concerned fellow human.
Aspiration can probably help in some cases, but it's a perception of protection. It's been proven repeatedly not to be effective 100%.
Slow injection is a. Imperative if you get any vac une shot.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mbZ6E2rhdcw
Here we have a review of hydrolic wounding practices of fluid injection injury of a iiving hermtically self contained organism.
And a first pioneer insight to the advantages of subcutaneous injections of medications, or homepathic needed delivery of medicaments or water memory encouragement of a imbalance or starving person or mamal.
Thanks to the Researcher. Marc Girardot and yourself, Dr. Campbell.
Body of Data Researcher, Broadleigh John Knight, sorry for lack of name recall.
This is a self note, of obviously signifanct research and medical proceedure for generic medical practices.
DR. CAMPBELL, you carry the same name as, Dr. A.R. Campbell of TX, USA who by 1929 or so, concluded Small Pox is a reaction to BED BUG Bite venom or toxin in their mouth where bacterial of such a savapore is quite active. A point he suggested, innoculating a person with Smallpox Vaccines, was useless, since a person bit by such bugs, will always have to excrete the non-water soluable toxin through the skin. Such as happens with Ergot poisoning, as well as; measles, mumps, chicken pox, ect. If one were to seriously avoid confirmation bias in accepting only germ theory or contagion theory or virus theory as the only cause of the skin organ assisting the body in elimination of toxins, venoms, poisons, and industrial pollutants.
DR. A.R. Campbell eliminated small pox in Dallas, TX, specifically by education about hygiene and bed cover cleanlyness, as well as sunbleeching, (minor) air drying quilts and blankets out doors periotically.
See old superstitions about "vampire", sunlight, Bed Bugs Photophobic bahavior, and Dustmite and poop ammerleration by sunlight exposure habits. Yes, analogue science is only a hint at actaul causation clues.
This is LNP-driven harm. I have noted some of my patients develop elevated D-dimer levels at the time of their adverse event. The UK standard of care is to carry out a CT-angiogram to check for PE, and then ignore the D-dimer result if the CT is negative. You have outlined a credible model for vaccine-induced vascular side effects - would D-dimer be elevated in these patients? How should these harms be diagnosed?
Do you have an opinion on what the set of adverse events due to mRNA/ spike protein harm would be?
And are there harms from contamination during the manufacturing process (e.g. DNA contamination)?
Absolutely D-dimers would be through the roof
Like keying a long scratch down the side of a car.
Rusts and peels the paint.
That is bad.
More worse for a Human.
So we still labour the bolus theory at the expense of other considerations.
Respectfully, your eyes are closed to evil and dangerous intent with the vaccines.
Unfortunately there are many that have these intentions and nanotechnology and its consequences should not be dismissed as 'impossible'.
The evil intent isn't in the vaccines (even if they were never needed), the evil Intent is pushing the vaccines and keeping going despite the accidents.
I did the analyses: the dosing is OK, the Abs rid most of the spike, there are some issues with manufacturing which can possibly integrate the nucleus in rare cases, the AEs are caused by the bolus, and the bolus accentuates the risks of cancer induced by the vx.
Circulating spike isn't causing this (see my articles that prove it).
Sticking to the truth is important.
Marc, The circulating spike is the antigen against which the immune system, especially after the 3rd booster, begins to respond with IgG4 type antibodies. These are trouble. Most importantly, these can, through what is called Fc-Fc binding, remove from battle antibodies targeting cancer cells/tumors. Too much spike antigen is a real problem in this respect, and it helps explain why so many "turbo cancers" show up after the booster. The counterintuitive aspect of this is that a spike-specific antibody would have any interaction at all with, for instance, a tumor-specific IgG1 antibody that is in the process of fighting the good fight... but it can, and it does!
https://lettingdataspeak.substack.com/p/tying-together-the-elements-of-an
Your original insights have added greatly to our body of knowledge on vaccine harms... but we can't let the spike protein off the hook. The IgG4 effect is real, and has strong explanatory power for certain of the harms.
The spike is the antigen, but as expressed on transfected cells.
Turbo cancer are caused by immune privileged stem cell transfection. The cancer is turbo bc of the high replicability of stem cells. They have been foundto be s'y inymous with metastasis.
IgG4s are imho a conjecture... Wouldn't be surprise they react with remnants of LNPs which are prese T, when spike hardly is post jab2, except if stem cell and progenitor cells get hit.
When it comes to cancer, latent infections, etc, I'd also be concerned about the ~ 1 week of lymphocytopenia reported in the phase 1-2 trials. E.g.:
"Our previous clinical experience with RNA vaccines suggests that the transient decrease in lymphocytes is likely to be attributable to innate immune stimulation-related redistribution of lymphocytes into lymphoid tissues20."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2814-7
I have a different hypothesis for lymphocytopenia.
And that's the transfection/permeabilization of the blood-bone marrow barrier which would lead to immature lymphocytes released in theblood, and a reduction in active lymphocytes.
Well, I have to say I don't care too much about the exact mechanism. It would be interesting to know though.
Does your theory predict a particular timecourse? Eg, why does it start a day or so after injection and resolve after a week?
Because most likely the blood bone marrow barrier is permeabilised, and so immature cells are released before they can mature, lowering Tcell count. Once the barrier is repaired, the immune cell can mature. Could also be the Thymus, but the frequency points to the bone-marrow...
I see, it seems like something that can be observed using some kind of tracer.
But, whatever the mechanism, if your lymphocytes drop too low for a period of time then all sorts of pathogens and cancers can gain a foothold.
We also saw many reports of increased rate of covid itself shortly after the first shot.
I think you’re spot on here. The mechanism of harm is something we haven’t faced before on this scale. Internal damage to the endothelium lining the vascular system would no doubt trigger clotting response and have downstream effects we haven’t experienced before—but the mechanisms aren’t new. What’s new is the intravascular delivery of LNPs and the bolus. This is an area where your theory makes perfect sense!
Marc this is exceptional work and very compelling. Thank you.! Considering the 14K+ different adverse reactions to these experimental Biologicals. Do you have an opinion as to whether these were deliberately formulated to turn the human body into a Biological time bomb? Any opinion on a possible PsyOp?
The only time bomb is Alzheimers, we've possibly added 300k per year
No this isn't well thought through.
I like this article!
As a tangent do you know about Christie Laura Grace who has a substack called Recombinant Reflections
https://christielauragrace.substack.com/
She is an expert in LNPs which you might find interesting and a conversation between the two of you would be interesting.
Here is one interview in which I think she mentions how she has a theory to explain the long fibrin style clots amoungst an explanation for many other side effects.
https://discernable.io/lipid-nanoparticles-the-real-danger-of-mrna-vaccines/
I don't trust this lady. She has a bizarre and rude behaviour. She came up with many theories, most of which were falsifiable. Apparently she stated that I stole her theory which I know nothing about. And she clearly hasn't gone anywhere as far as I have.
I want nothing to do with this lady. Thanks for the proposal nonetheless.
Just listened to her for over an hour and I disagree with you Marc. She's an excentric nerd is all. She admitted to guessing but her guesses seemed backed by her experience. I found her fascinating
You have a right to your opinion :-), JJ.
I like that. Thank God!
She has been very rude to me. I don't like being bullied or insulted. The only response is avoidance, else it becomes a humiliating and ressource draining useless fight. Don't have time/ressource for that.
My methodology has never been guessing, I've have been applying rigorously the scientific method.
Posit me this. What if there are micro-razors (aka graphene) slicing up your blood vessels. Would that not make more sense. Please access Dr. Andreas' analysis of graphene being included in the mRNA injections.
Respectfully, that's impossible.
For 2 reasons:
(1)The endothelial wall thickness is 0.5 to 5.0 μm when graphene is 0.3nm, so there's at least a factor 1000...no way it would even scratch the wall.
(2) if it. Would harm The cells the damage would be systemic, all cells would be damaged. Not at all what we are witnessing.
Graphene is a hoax.
The absurd 'Noack' razor blade video was a hoax and specifically targeted to divert those looking at bio nanotech. It worked as intended. The gullible had their fears boosted with disinformation that was then emotionally asserted as claims and accusations that discredited the subject as a topic of discussion.
The fundamental nature of such nanotech is bio-Electrical.
I'd go further to say that our victorian plumbing models of biology are for the most part ignorant of bio-electrical context.
I have no investment in GO as a suspect for covax Experimentation, but I don't rule out the intent of dark spun biotech as a significant element in the global lockstepping active psyop/agenda.
See zeta for why 2 isn't so.
So, him dying in jail is a hoax too? Amazing how you believe believe stuff that is not true. A guy gets arrested about talking abut graphene.. and the next day his is dead? Might be a coincidence, but just seems way too convenience to be so. Oh, and btw, here is an NIH paper stating graphene is in the mRNA https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27266364/
In toxicology, you need a certain level of concentration for damage to occur. If you saturate the body with graphene, sure it will be damaging and people will die. not what we are seeing.
No damages for the vaccine are nots systemic, they are always very much localised. It can be anywhere, but it is not everywhere. Systemic damage would be a cytokine storm and all organs failing. this is not what we are observing. We are observing concentrated hits with tranfection (spike production that triggers an immune attack).
OK Marc, and you please explain the long blood clots that embalmers are experiencing? They look like long scabs.. Also Marc an axe is not as thick as a tree, but it is amazing how many trees have been felled by an axe so your "science" is flawed.
Try chopping a 1meter diameter tree with a 1mm axe...
On the white clots, it's quite simple.
The endothelial lining of blood vessels gets destroyed by a massive immune attack leaves the smooth muscle layer bare. This layer is not designed to withstand circulating blood, and so erodes/decays over time, leaving the elastin layer bare without calcification inhibitors (produced by the smooth muscle layer). So cholesterol calcification and other crystalizations occur and blend to the elastin.
So should people be on ASA if infected, as per flccc, or amyloid busters like lumbrokinase, serrapetase , natto as others suggest?
Or might it make things worst?
Pardon my ignorance. What is ASA,?
acetylsalicylic acid =
Aspirin .. we say ASA here in Canada ..
And Natto seems NOT to break up spike protein says sasha latypova .go figure .
So many voices all saying different things .. so little time !
There's no significant spike post D9 jab 1...Nattokinase can help with other aspect of the pathology... If the blood is overwhelmed with coagulation factor nattijinase supplements would make sense.
I used all three of them in the last two years and just use lumbrokinase now because I think it helped me the most but I only had high d dimers and swelling, no real loss of platelets. I don't think enzymes thin the blood vessel wall like ASA does over time.
ASA being?
I don't know. I haven't studied those.
Amyloids can and should be dealt with by the immune system.
Not sure the these will help with crystallisation... Helping endothelial is key in my mind.
Asa is aspirin.
We have talked a bit on Twitter. I had Astrazen not mRNA and I took the enzymes because of swelling and having heart issues with high d dimer, it was really hard to get medical care, lots are still staying that, I'm in Canada. The vaccine itself went into the back of my shoulder creating a systemic reaction including my heart and liver. Endothelial damage might have been my problem which seems to be still healing two years later or maybe I am developing autoimmune.
I ended up covered in cherry angiomas like old people get, hundreds on my chest back and stomach and into my arms and legs, probably from the swelling or injury to the small vessels near the surface? I have a friend who is a retired doctor.
I recently was told that the batch I had was bad and came from a contaminated factory in the US, and many people died from that batch, so I guess I'm lucky.
I am trying to heal myself without hurting anything.
I think I am better off than those getting new experimental drugs.
As I told Mike, I don't believe in the bad batches story. too many confounders (sse my response to Mike)
The product is cytotoxic by proxy in of itself. Hence the importance of this article.
if all the LNPS in one dose transfected/killed a cell, all vaccinated would have died.
It's like having billions of small bombs in a city, but only a small number explode in isolation, no real harm. But imagine for a reason or another more bombs would explode and they'd explode in clusters, like a truck of ammunition, then the damage is much greater.
I am happy you are doing better. Anything that can help your endothelium is likely welcome. Low inflammation, no vaccines etc..
I will keep learning about endothelium. Interesting, explains reaction/sensitivity to dye from CT scan too asI swelled from it too, and that was five months later and took long time to calm down.
111M views, doesn't cover Astrazen but I found found the scope of injury interesting. Even if you don't buy into it, the side effects are crazy for many people.
https://howbadismybatch.com/
https://howbadismybatch.com/lot.html
I buy into the side effects. They are real. no question. I don't buy in the QA problem being their cause. Take care.
First, I appreciate your contributions and found the discussion with Dr. Campbell fascinating and valuable. I am glad I found it.
Jessica Rose has written about the spike triggering development of amyloid proteins as a consequence of the destruction of red blood cells and unfolding of hemoglobin (as I understand it). I believe that post was on or about Sept 15, 2022. However, I agree with you that in most /many cases the immune system would take care of the amyloid proteins but at least hypothetically, in some cases the immune system could be overwhelmed. In reading elsewhere Dr, Mercola has stated that as many as one-third of the proteins a cell makes are misfolded so obviously cells have mechanisms to digest those misfolded proteins and recycle the components. However, in one of Dr. Arne Burkhardt's video presentations of autopsy pathology slides i recall he pointed to evidence of amyloid infiltration and consequent scarring of the heart muscle, suggesting that development of amyloid isn't always cleared by the immune system and amyloidosis is a recognized disease diagnosis pre-Covid which according to a google search is difficult to treat and is often fatal with an average time from diagnosis to death of 3.5 years.
Now, a second item. I would guess that the long 1000 cuts hypothesis also means that such cuts would generate a significant inflammatory response. If so, then there is the potential that the inflammation would trigger calcification of the arteries as a protective response. A simple search on Google or PubMed (of inflammation and calcification) generates numerous papers relating arterial calcification to vascular inflammation, regardless of the cause of the inflammation. The reason for the concern is that my brother recently had a CT cardiac scan that returned a high calcium number. He had previously had one several years prior to mRNA vaccines that was very low with only one small area of calcium deposits. He is lean, 73 yrs old, and is very careful with his diet (primarily vegetarian with seafood and limiting saturated fat - he is a Dr. Steve Gundry adherent) because of our family history of CVD - father, grandfather, mother-stroke, etc. My hypothesis is that his high calcium CT score is actually a consequence of arterial calcification consequent to vascular inflammation consequent to the mRNA vaccine damage of a 1000 cuts as you propose. Is this a reasonable hypothesis?
Calcification is tied to local lack of calcification inhibitors. It means the endothelial wall was damaged in sufficient amount that the inhibitors produced by endothelial cells is deficient.
Of course, the fibrin is part of the coagulation cascade started by "a thousand cuts" scenario.
Again the coagulation cascade started is overwhelming for coagulation inhibitors but likely also to lyse fibrin.
I believe my topological explanation of thrombosis can be extrapolated here at a localised level.
Marc, I met you briefly about in the beginning of this mess during a PANDA meeting. I am grateful you have continued to persevere all these long months in this hypothesis development.
At some point when I’m done w grad school, I would love to collaborate on a paper with you outlining the consequences of your findings for nurses/patients/ medication administration.
I think the ‘thousand cuts’ has merits. I have to come back a reread more slowly.
Love back from across the pond.
Have yet to write one scientific paper. Let's where we all end up.
Thanks so much for the kind words
Very interesting. To say biology has nothing to do with physics is simple gatekeeping. Of course physics affect our biology.