Why the Medical Freedom Movement Should Move with Caution on the Yale Findings

There are credible alternative hypotheses to DNA integration that can explain why spike protein tests could be positive 700 days after vaccination...

Yesterday, Alex Berenson published an article talking about a team at Yale finding circulating spike proteins from the COVID vaccines in some blood samples of patients the team led by Professor A. Iwasaki follows as part of a project called LISTEN. Nothing really new, but even though Berenson remained cautious, he did make a big deal out of it, notably because it comes from a prestigious team at Yale. Social Media are still in turmoil. Many view the study to be published as confirmation evidence of integration of plasmid DNA and expression of the vaccine spike protein by human cells.

I would encourage everyone to be very cautious here.

First, Pr. Akiko Iwasaki has come out with the best Covid scientific analyses these past 5 years, and until her paper is out, I’d be extremely watchful. But more importantly, most in the Medical Freedom Movement have ignored a more probable explanation for the apparent “persistence of circulating spike”.

Let’s assume lab errors are out of the way.

Two realistic hypotheses could explain the continued presence of circulating Covid-vaccine-induced spike proteins:

1. A possibility is that some spike proteins blocked inside the white clots are progressively freed into the bloodstream, and detected. There is evidence of spike protein presence in white clots found on cadavers and extracted for patients. The logic is that when T-cells flayed the spike-producing endothelial cells, the coagulation cascade that precipitated onto the linings trapped spike proteins liberated from the cells destroyed. Even if the vaccine-injured was taking a fibrinolytic (to dissolve the fibrinous white clots), it is unlikely that the quantities would be very high.

2. A more probable scenario is that there is a spike twin that is being produced by the body in sufficient quantity to be detectable and to react with the tests. Why would I say that? Many vaccine-injured have been suffering terribly and have been trying multiple therapies. One therapy specific therapy that would trigger the body to produce a spike-protein twin is IntraVenous Immunoglobulin-g (aka IVIg), it’s a blood-derived product made of anti-spike antibodies. The purpose of IVIGs is to neutralize the supposed persistent spike proteins.

“Post-Vaccination Syndrome: A Descriptive Analysis of Reported Symptoms and Patient Experiences After Covid-19 Immunization” by Krumholz et al.

And indeed, apparently, roughly 8% of the 241 vaccine-injured (19?) participants to the LISTEN study were taking “blood-derived products”, so there is a real possibility some were indeed taking IVIgs (I have heard of people having Plasmapheresis also¹), and that the spike-tests could be reacting to the anti-IVIg antibodies that are specially selected and produced by the immune system to bind to anti-spike antibodies, and therefore would trigger (false-)positive results the tests used to detect spike.

The anti-spike therapy would actually stimulate the spike, or a spike-twin.

So the body would, indeed, be producing spike twins to neutralize the iVIGs via B cells reacting to the therapy. I explained this phenomenon in an article last summer.

Here’s the big picture explanation.

Why Tests Show Spike Protein Productions Months After Vaccination...

In other words, vaccine-injured wouldn’t have persistent spike proteins produced by DNA integration, but would have antibodies subsequent to the treatment they are taking…

---

That would not necessarily preclude DNA to be integrated into the nuclei of some cells, namely stem cell , the only cells that can survive vaccine transfections as I have explained in “The Needle’s Secret”. But, my research suggests that these vaccine-injured would more be at risk of cancer than of producing spike protein…

I hope this can be helpful.

Thank you for your trust. Love from Paris.

Marc

PS: Don’t hesitate to support my work and my family either by subscribing to a paid-membership, by making a small contribution on PayPal (marc.girardot@icloud.com), by buying “The Needle’s Secret” on Amazon or talking about the Bolus Theory in your community, or by introducing me to possible sponsors.

marc.girardot@icloud.com on PayPal

1. A procedure that removes plasma from the blood and replaces it with donor plasma, albumin, or a plasma substitute