The Bolus Theory Needs Your Help.
"The Needle's Secret" is nearly finished. The Bolus Theory today is the only reproducible theory, validated on animals, explaining all the vaccine adverse events and spanning all vaccines.
Dear cherished readers,
I trust this letter finds you and your loved ones in good health and, hopefully, tranquility.
I apologize for my silence these past four months as I have dedicated all my attention to writing my almost-finished book on the Bolus Theory “The Needle’s Secret” (I also cared for a few beautiful kittens - see photo).
Last week, I recounted to a friend the hard-to-believe experience I had when I tested the Bolus Theory1 on Autism.
When I started writing “The Needle’s Secret” in May, I had very little knowledge about autism. Nonetheless, I decided to test the theory with a series of hypotheses that needed to be true if the Bolus Theory were to explain Autistic Syndrome Disorders.
I listed forty hypotheses that had to be true if a Bolus was indeed the root cause. The founding premise was that, if a bolus had harmed the amygdala of a child, it would have a higher probability of “also having harmed elsewhere that person” than in people who didn’t get an intravascular injection. So I went on to check forty different ways the injection could harm from specific endocrine disorders to cancer, from Parkinson’s disease to heart defects, from Guillain-Barré to blindness…
And, indeed, all forty hypotheses came out true2…
My friend, a Nobel Prize winner as well as a Professor of BioPhysics, exclaimed a loud: “Wow!”.
Imagine, one chance out of two of being wrong at each hypothesis.
Two to the power of forty3 is 1,100 billion.
The chance of the Bolus Theory4 not explaining Autism is 1 in 1.1 trillion.
Let that sink in…
Imagine addressing a highly complex topic, you know nothing about, and stating 40 truth in a row like only an expert would. That’s a very powerful testament to the power of the Bolus Theory.
My Professor-friend, after taking two full-pages of notes, commented:
“It’s actually pretty simple!”,
but never challenged the findings, nor the method.
Empathically, he told me he was more concerned with the resistance I would face...
How’s that for a validation?
A Nobel Prize, expert in the field, agreeing with Bolus Theory.
A probabilistic experience that gives a 1/1,100,000,000,000 chance of being wrong.
A reproducible theory, validated on animals multiple times56789 and, unfortunately, on humans1011 as well.
A theory that explains logically all the adverse events, and that sticks rigorously to the clinical signs observed by design.
The implications of the Bolus Theory are overwhelming and unimaginable: arteriosclerosis, endocrine disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, reproductive disorders, intestinal disorders, cancer, genetic disease… all modern-day illnesses that have skyrocketed these past fifty years despite considerable scientific progress.
Unwrapping the Bolus Theory and its consequences promises a new paradigm that should significantly mitigate injection-inflicted sufferings, often provide adapted cures and save countless lives in the near future, if we manage getting it off the ground...
The gravity of the Bolus Theory cannot be overstated:
With likely over 670 million individuals inadvertently receiving intravascular injections these past three years, the aftermath will be staggering and will only add to an already sad landscape.
Clinical repercussions have touched in my estimate 128 million lives, and as per the estimation of Professor Rancourt et al, an already grim consistent tally of 17 million deaths.
Realistically, there’s so much I can do alone.
The collective dystopian monster I have unveiled needs a collective force of critical thinkers, of awaken parents, of grounded citizens and of investors to bring it all to an end.
As a society, we have been harming ourselves with billions of inadvertent IV injections for over a century, a form of industrial accident, a massive invisible off-protocol mishap12 that we are blindly accelerating upon in a form of societal suicide.
Here’s a chart of IV risks from “The Needle’s Secret” (FYEO), simulating the vaccine schedule of a 5-year old in the US: 75% probability of suffering 1+ IV injection , and 25% probability of clinical harm (add 3 COVID shots it goes to 79% and 26% !).
Literally collective suicide.
I have contributed 9,000 hours of my life to helping the world, to informing you, Dear Reader, to the best of my abilities; spent considerable energy, time and personal resources working on COVID; sacrificed opportunities with friends and family; let go professional and financial opportunities; and today, for the first time in my life, I can’t pay my rent or even my little girl’s swimming lessons. This week, for food, my family depended on the goodwill and generosity of a kind-hearted Australian lady (Let’s call her Lady T. 🙏🏼 ) who understands the enormity of the Bolus Theory and works extra-time to be able to send me enough to occasionally feed my family.
Here’s what Lady T. just wrote to me.
Another very supportive friend is Nick Hudson, the founder of Panda, who is a Founding Member of my Substack, and a fan of the Bolus Theory.
Dear Reader, my family and I need your help to continue pushing this forward. I hope you can understand. Here’s how you can help:
Get to know the Bolus Theory well enough to be able to spread the word.
Word of mouth is key as you all know.
The Bolus Theory deserves much more awareness.
Don’t hesitate to reach out to me for any question.
As you know, I am always happy to explain, give analogies and provide data.Discuss the theory with friends and loved-ones, get them to subscribe to my Substack, ideally to the paying subscription, if they can afford to.
I will start writing again as soon as the book is finished, in a few days.If you can afford a small amount, or subscribe as a paying subscriber, or even as a founding member, please do so, that can make a world of difference, will alleviate my concerns for my family, and help me focus on the immense task ahead.
If you know of any organization, or any well-off individuals who could/would be willing to help support me push the Bolus Theory through the finish-line, please reach out to them.
Tell them why you believe our cause is essential, and don’t hesitate put me in contact.To the exception of John Campbell, probably because I am not a biologist or a doctor, or possibly because I am not into scaremongering, so far I haven’t been invited to any large audience platforms, and so the Bolus Theory - despite its incredible power, robustness and simplicity - still hasn’t taken off, so feel free to reach to any show, or news anchor, you might know to suggest my name, that can also make a difference. Scaling will make the difference.
If you know personally any high quality publisher who could be interested, feel free to reach out to them, and put us in contact. (the book is currently in english, but I’d be happy to be published in any language)
Finally, don’t hesitate to reach out to me to propose ideas. My focus to date has been solely on the science, not on gaining audience. So any recommendation or proposition is always welcome.
I apologize humbly for this blunt, candid and personal request. As a father, I no longer have the choice, I need to secure my family. I hope you will understand that, and will decide to support us.
Thank you very much for your attention, for your readership and for help. It’s truly an honour.
Warmest regards,
Marc Girardot
Covid Myth Buster Series
If you forgot what the Bolus Theory: The idea is that injectors often inject by accident directly into blood vessels the vaccine particles with a 270,000-fold concentration, follows considerable endothelial damage (blood vessel walls) which trigger thrombosis, necrosis, micro-perforations… as well as damage to stem cells (cancer and genetic disorders).
“Autism Revelation: Associated Medical Conditions Point Clearly to a Common Avoidable Cause” by Marc Girardot - Reference
[2^40] = 1,099,511,627,776
Not limited to vaccines btw, could possibly be vitamin K or anaesthetics…
“Intravenous Injection of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA Vaccine Can Induce Acute Myopericarditis in Mouse Model” by Li et al - Reference
“Thrombocytopenia and splenic platelet directed immune responses after intravenous ChAdOx1 nCov-19 administration” by Nicolai et al - Reference
“Fatal Adverse Pulmonary Reaction in Calves after Inadvertent Intravenous Vaccination” by Ramsay et al - Reference
“Induction of Shock After Intravenous Injection of Adenovirus Vectors: A Critical Role for Platelet-activating Factor” by Xu et al - Reference
“Intravenous administration of recombinant adenoviruses causes thrombocytopenia, anemia and erythroblastosis in rabbits” by Cichon et al - Reference
“Child Vaccinated At Doctor's Guidance Now Suffering From Myocarditis Two Days After Inoculation” by Olivia Cavallaro - Reference
“Professional Mountain Bike Racer Describes Life-Altering Vaccine Injuries After Second Pfizer COVID Shot: Kyle Warner, a 29-year-old professional mountain bike racer, developed pericarditis, POTS and reactive arthritis following his second dose of Pfizer’s COVID shot.” by Dr. Joseph Mercola - Reference
Since I have been banned by Naomi Wolf, Robert Malone, Steven Krisch and dropped Alex Bererson, I have money to throw around. I have become a paid subscriber, and I will gladly pay 100 dollars for a signed copy of your new book. A signed page no nameplate sticker.
Please clarify that you do not claim your theory explains all damage from all injections. Some seem to think this is your position.
Not only do they no longer use aspiration but won't do it even upon request (CVC).
I have walked out leaving the tech holding a wasted injection.
Last observation.
Simple answers requiring simple remedies are not money makers.
So I doubt your theory will ever receive the respect it deserves.
So I ask all your readers and believers to step up and walk out when aspiration and slow injection is not going to be done. The market forces can create change. Make it about the money then the attention will come.
Thank you for your work and sacrifices.
Tell your daughter to swim fast. Winners don't pay.
I graduated from Nursing School ( a BSN program) in 1978. We were “old school” and taught to ALWAYS aspirate before a subcutaneous or intramuscular injection to check for blood. If blood appeared in the syringe, we were taught to remove the syringe and inject into a different spot.
But younger nurses, tell me that they are no longer taught this. They have been taught that the chances of hitting a capillary or small vein are so minuscule that they do not need to aspirate first. I wonder if this change in procedure is involved?
In my 40 year career, I can remember aspirating blood twice while giving IM injections.