Any Severe Covid Patient Can Produce More Virus Than All The Children in America Combined

Dangerous Children Myth - Children were never a danger to society - Covid Myth Buster

For my first post on Substack, I wanted to debunk one of the most preposterous assertions of Team Apocalypse: The fallacy that children are a danger to society and to grandma. I will demonstrate it’s quite the contrary.

I will not dive into the rationale for the intolerable crime against humanity committed on our children throughout the world these past two years.

Is it senescent leaders afraid of dying who were ready to throw our kids under the bus?
Is it simply a smokescreen because kids are defenceless?
Is it an additional way to create panic in parents?

The fact is that children have been accused of being the principal source of SARS-COV-2 and have been outrageously bullied because of that. It is ironic that those who feel at peace bullying our children are often the same righteous people who were tutoring against bullying practices at school a few years ago…

The reality is that collectively children are least prone to propagating a toxic dose of SARS-COV-2: they carry the smallest viral load for the shortest duration.  In fact, it is certain healthy children produce exponentially less than very elderly/sick persons with delayed immune responses.

I had addressed this extensively in my August article: “A Novel Perspective on a Not So Novel Virus”, highlighting the many differences in propagation dynamics between children and adults, summarised in the scheme below, and explaining why children can be natural vaccines more than anything else.

But, I hadn’t taken the time to prove how dramatic the difference was between a child mildly sick for a couple of days and an elderly carrying the virus for weeks.

In fact, a simple mathematical calculation using this duration and the SC2 propagation speed is sufficient to demonstrate the reality of who is poisonous to whom. And spoiler alert, it’s not the children.